Revd Stephanie 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️
@stephminster.bsky.social
130 followers 270 following 190 posts
"A woman who wears her spleen on her sleeve." Chaplain, Feminist, Lefty and Proud 🏳️‍🌈 🏳️‍⚧️ She/her.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
stephminster.bsky.social
Horrible and also no surprise. The problem is that members of these anti-trans hate groups don't actually believe that being trans is a real thing - because most of them have never knowingly got to know a trans person. So they honestly believe that trans women are men pretending to be women 1/
stephminster.bsky.social
This thread is essential reading today:
leftistlawyer.com
Tomorrow we're going to hear a lot of speeches and posts that pretend the so-called Israeli-Palestinian conflict began on October 7, 2023.

Tomorrow we're going to hear a lot of speeches and posts equating hundreds of deaths with hundreds of thousands of deaths,
Reposted by Revd Stephanie 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️
stephminster.bsky.social
Okay, so at least it now starts with her name rather than her husband's, but they still think that her being married with kids is more important than being Bishop of London, the third most senior post in the CofE.
Subheading has been amended to say, "Sarah Mullally, 63-year-old archbishop-designate is married with has two children. Originally from Woking in Surrey, she was the UK's chief nursing officer from 1999 to 2004."
Reposted by Revd Stephanie 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️
churchofengland.org
A prayer for the next Archbishop of Canterbury. 🙏
Almighty and everlasting God,
the only worker of great marvels,
send down upon your servant Sarah,
called to be Archbishop of Canterbury,
and all who are committed to her care,
the spirit of your saving grace,
and that they may truly please you,
pour upon them the continual dew of your blessing.
Grant this, O Lord,
for the honour of our advocate and mediator,
Jesus Christ.
Amen.
Reposted by Revd Stephanie 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️
stephaniejane.bsky.social
Now 54,380 signatures of women who stand with trans women.

Let’s keep this going!

Please sign, if you haven’t already done so.
Please share, if you have.
nionwomen.bsky.social
✨ We’ve Moved! ✨

Thank you to the 42,890 people who have signed, shared and supported our letter so far: Not In Our Name: Women in support of the trans+ community.

🌐 NotInOurName.org.uk
Reposted by Revd Stephanie 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️
natacha.bsky.social
The Starmer government is REALLY running scared of this petition, now at 2.75 million, to the extent that it has responded 3 months early, in a transparent attempt to spike it.

So please, under no circumstances should you sign it and share it widely. Starmer & his boss McSweeney would not like it.
Petition: Do not introduce Digital ID cards
We demand that the UK Government immediately commits to not introducing a digital ID cards. There are reports that this is being looked at.
petition.parliament.uk
Reposted by Revd Stephanie 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️
hleehurley.com
"The new trans rules are “not right” and should be reviewed by MPS, one of Labour’s deputy leadership candidates has said.

"Lucy Powell appeared to criticise the (EHRC) guidance on transgender issues, which has advised that workplaces provide protected single-sex spaces." [Telegraph]
Trans guidance ‘not right’ and in need of shake-up, says Powell
Party’s deputy leadership contender suggests EHRC advice should be subject to ‘robust conversation’ ‘When we’re looking at applying the law as parliamentarians, we should have a say on that’ Trans guidance ‘not right’ and in need of shake-up, says Powell
Party’s deputy leadership contender suggests EHRC advice should be subject to ‘robust conversation’ ‘When we’re looking at applying the law as parliamentarians, we should have a say on that’
The Daily Telegraph1 Oct 2025By Tony Diver and Gordon Rayner

THE new trans rules are “not right” and should be reviewed by MPS, one of Labour’s deputy leadership candidates has said.

Lucy Powell appeared to criticise the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) guidance on transgender issues, which has advised that workplaces provide protected single-sex spaces.

The Manchester MP is odds-on favourite to replace Angela Rayner as Labour’s deputy leader next month, and has pledged to offer a critical voice on the Government from outside the Cabinet.

Her opponent, Bridget Phillipson, the Education Secretary, is viewed as Downing Street’s preferred candidate for the job.

Speaking at a fringe event of the party conference on Monday evening, Ms Powell was asked whether she supported the EHRC’S interim guidance on trans issues, which was issue after a ruling by the Supreme Court in April.

The guidance suggested that businesses and public bodies must provide protection for women-only spaces such as lavatories because the court said legal obligations under the Equality Act were determined by biological sex, not gender identity. Ms Powell suggested that MPS should review the full guidance before it is published later this year, opening the door to a veto in Parliament for the protection of women-only spaces.

She said: “I think we have got some of the language not right on this, and particularly around some of the guidance that’s coming forward.

“I really strongly feel like we need a robust and transparent parliamentary conversation about that, because when we’re looking at applying the law as parliamentarians, we should have a say on that and that’s something I’ll be pushing for as well.”

Sources close to Ms Powell said she believed MPS should have the power to influence the rules because they will become law. But her suggestion raises the prospect of a protracted debate in Parliament over the trans ruling, which has already divided parties and MPS.

The Conservatives accused Labour of “siding with radical trans activists” and warned against interference in the guidance from Parliament. Claire Coutinho, the shadow equalities minister, said: “The Supreme Court was crystal clear – biological sex matters, and women have a right to single-sex spaces.

“Time and again, Labour has sided with radical trans activists instead of the women fighting to protect their changing rooms and toilets from biological men. Labour cannot be trusted to protect the privacy, dignity, and safety of women and girls.” The row comes in the run-up to a deputy leadership hustings between Ms Powell and Ms

Phillipson at the Labour Party conference today.

In a combative interview yesterday, Ms Powell also argued that Labour was “pleasing no one” by tacking to the Right.

The former leader of the Commons, who was sacked in the latest reshuffle, also took a swipe at Ms Phillipson over an “ill-advised” tweet that suggested Ms Powell would bring infighting to the party if she got the job.

Speaking to the Politico website in front of an audience at the conference in Liverpool, Ms Powell said party members should vote for h Sir Keir Starmer’s attempts to see off the threat of Reform UK by moving to the Right on immigration and digital ID meant “we are losing more voters the other way”, she said, while failing to win back Labour voters who have abandoned the party for Nigel Farage.

“If you think everything is going great and swimmingly, don’t vote for me,” she said. “If you think we need a course correction, then vote for me.”

Earlier in the day Ms Phillipson posted on X that: “The choice is clear. Labour’s heart and soul in government with me as deputy leader. Or more distractions, infighting and noise.”

Although she did not name Ms Powell, it has been interpreted as a clear message that her rival, who is backed by Andy Burnham, the Mayor of Greater Manchester, would be a disruptive influence. Ms Powell said: “It was an ill-advised post, to be honest. Debate is not dissent.”

She was again clear that she would challenge Sir Keir behind closed doors if he is not representing the views of members.

“I think we can be better than what we have been and more successful,” she said.

“Part of doing that will be that we have broader voices at the table and if we hear from those broader voices we will make better decisions.”

Article Name:Trans guidance ‘not right’ and in need of shake-up, says Powell
Publication:The Daily Telegraph
Author:By Tony Diver and Gordon Rayner
Start Page:6
End Page:6
Reposted by Revd Stephanie 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️
fergus.oolong.co.uk
People WILL refuse to vote for a party that persecutes trans people, cuts social security, scapegoats immigrants and supports genocide.

If your response to that is 'nooo, they're voting wrong, they'll let the REAL bad guys win' rather than 'let's make sure they don't have to', YOU are the problem.
stephminster.bsky.social
Thank you! I have written to my MP multiple times about this and have not received any response so it is a relief to see that not all MPs are refusing to defend the trans community.
Reposted by Revd Stephanie 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️
sianberry.bsky.social
I have come to the conclusion the EHRC guidance on single sex spaces should not even come to Parliament. It is misleading and has caused distress for my trans constituents.

I urge @bphillipsonMP to reject it on grounds of practicality and human rights.

sianberry.org.uk/publications/l…
An image of Sian's letter to the Minister for Women and Equalities. 

You can read the full text of her letter at:

https://www.sianberry.org.uk/publications/letter-regarding-statutory-guidance-from-the-equality-human-rights-commission/
Reposted by Revd Stephanie 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️
tabouchadi.bsky.social
The success of the far right is not only measured in votes and seats but in its impact on rhetoric, policy and ideology. The fact that a (nominally) social democratic head of government with a huge majority choses to say and do this is maybe the biggest success of the far right in Europe yet.
Reposted by Revd Stephanie 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️
goodlawproject.org
One of the unexpected things I've learned from my advocacy for trans people is how malignant parts of the State can be, how it can misuse data for positively evil purposes. It's taught me people can't be safe with a digital ID card and so I've signed this. petition.parliament.uk/petitions/73...
Petition: Do not introduce Digital ID cards
We demand that the UK Government immediately commits to not introducing a digital ID cards. There are reports that this is being looked at.
petition.parliament.uk
Reposted by Revd Stephanie 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️
danielsohege.bsky.social
Anyone buying into Trump and RFK Jr's bs doesn't give a damn about science.
All of this has been repeatedly disproven. It's conspiracy crap designed to blame mums and treat autistic individuals as if we're the problem rather than the way we're treated. #r4today
www.independent.co.uk/news/world/a...
Trump makes false claim linking Tylenol to autism as doctors insist it’s safe: Live
RFK Jr has pushed a discredited theory that routine vaccinations are responsible for rise in the diagnosis
www.independent.co.uk
Reposted by Revd Stephanie 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️
Reposted by Revd Stephanie 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️
Reposted by Revd Stephanie 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️
tristangrayford.scot
In an "olive branch" Streeting defended everything he did to strip healthcare from young trans people as right and justified and said absolutely nothing about any way he'd move away from that targeted campaign to eradicate trans people.

Come ON @theguardian.com. This is atrocious.
"In an olive branch to the trans community, many of whom felt betrayed by Streeting’s early decision as health secretary to pause the use of puberty blockers, he said he knew “young trans people who are desperately worried not just by the toxicity of some of the debates, but about this community’s safety and wellbeing”.

“I know there are questions in our community about my motivation on this issue and the decisions that I took within days of coming into office,” he said. “My motivation has only ever been to make sure that medicine given to children is safe and effective, and grounded in robust evidence.

“More broadly, I’ve sought to acknowledge the tensions that have arisen between trans rights and the sex-based rights of women, so that as a country, we can find a way through that ensures equality, dignity, safety and inclusion for all,” he added."
stephminster.bsky.social
Done.
esqueer.net
Here are the _public_ email addresses for the reporters and the standards editor listed on the WSJ site.

Standards editor:
[email protected]

Journalists who wrote the article:
[email protected]
[email protected]

Politely and peacefully demand a retraction and an apology.
gbbranstetter.bsky.social
Transgender people are owed a retraction and apology from @wsj.com. The lie has already become canon to millions and it seems the least they could do.
Reposted by Revd Stephanie 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️
newschambers.bsky.social
I’m sure there’ll be corrections in equally prominent positions in each of these papers, yeah?
Reposted by Revd Stephanie 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️
tacc.org.uk
We asked the EHRC whether they consulted any trans, intersex or LGBTQ+ groups before intervening in the 2024 Supreme Court case For Women Scotland v Scottish Ministers.

Their answer? They didn’t. 1/
Text about EHRC not directly contacting Transgender, Intersex, LGBTQ+ groups before November 2024 hearing. Describes regular engagement with such groups.
stephminster.bsky.social
"Free speech is important, says the British government, unless you’re saying something we don’t want to hear. Then you’re a terrorist. “The further a society drifts from truth, the more it will hate those who speak it,” George Orwell could have said five minutes ago."
natacha.bsky.social
This is good;

"Minister of Hypocrisy Wes Streeting"

"So there we have it. One Irish person is charged with ‘terrorism’ in a UK court for speaking out against violence, while another Irish person is being held up as a victim of unfree speech for speaking out in favour of violence."
Suzanne Harrington: The UK's treatment of Graham Linehan and Kneecap is a study in contrasts
"Unlike Linehan, in court charged with harassing a trans teenager and smashing their phone (this was before he urged his online followers to physically attack trans people), Mo Chara’s ‘terrorist’ cha...
www.irishexaminer.com
stephminster.bsky.social
Oh yes!! And a whole Fort Hold complex complete with the Harper Hall and little stalls for a Gather...
Reposted by Revd Stephanie 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️
revrachelmann.bsky.social
I wonder what m’learned friend @judgedewie.bsky.social makes of this and the contempt thing in particular … it is hard to imagine, as a lay person, that jurors in a separate case won’t see the Beeb’s handling of Mr Linehan.