Scholar

Keith E. Whittington

Keith E. Whittington is an American political scientist and legal scholar. He has been the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of… more

H-index: 20
Political science 49%
Law 25%
kewhittington.bsky.social
Plenty of those need to be cleaned up in revisions
kewhittington.bsky.social
If I’m ever elected president, I will work into every speech my grievances with Reviewer 2
savchenkoua.bsky.social
🇺🇸🇺🇳 Trump: Years ago, I bid $500 million to rebuild the UN complex, marble floors, mahogany walls, best of everything.

They chose another plan, cost $2–4 billion, far worse, massive overruns, no marble floors. I was right.

Reposted by: Keith E. Whittington

savchenkoua.bsky.social
🇺🇸🇺🇳 Trump: Years ago, I bid $500 million to rebuild the UN complex, marble floors, mahogany walls, best of everything.

They chose another plan, cost $2–4 billion, far worse, massive overruns, no marble floors. I was right.

by Keith E. WhittingtonReposted by: Tom Clark

kewhittington.bsky.social
I’d say the appropriate reaction in a constitutional democracy is to keep someone with that attitude the hell away from the White House, but here we are
kewhittington.bsky.social
Ok, let’s take a look at this flag burning executive order. As usual, much less than meets the eye, but great for culture war fodder on both sides 1/
atrupar.com
Trump signs an executive order: "If you burn a flag, you get one year in jail."
kewhittington.bsky.social
As predicted, the flag-burning EO is a nothing burger from a legal or policy perspective, but I’m sure it will help everyone with their small-dollar donors. But I would advise criminals to avoid desecrating American flags while they do their criming. 12/12
kewhittington.bsky.social
Foreign nationals might have more to worry about, but again not because there’s now a new legal constraint but because burning flags will be a good way to prioritize your deportation on other grounds. 11/
kewhittington.bsky.social
Let’s litigate to “clarify the scope of the First Amendment exceptions in this area”! Sure, good luck with that. And for those saying “But the Roberts Court!” The Roberts Court is extremely 1A friendly and even Alito has favorably cited the flag burning opinions. Loser. 10/
kewhittington.bsky.social
There is already evidence that cops arrest people in such cases that prosecutors refuse to prosecute. EO might encourage cops to be more aggressive in making such arrests, even if arrestees continue to get immediately kicked by prosecutors and magistrates. 9/
kewhittington.bsky.social
Same with the referral to local officials for local crimes, but one can easily imagine some overreach in prosecutions that courts will predictably bat down. 8/
kewhittington.bsky.social
The actual directive to the AG here is festooned with legal limitations. Maybe this changes prosecutorial priorities, but that’s it. If you are going to beat someone up, you might not want to do it at the same time you desecrate the American flag. 7/
kewhittington.bsky.social
Administration will prosecute lawless actions that also involve flag-burning? Ok, whatever. The prosecuting criminal behavior is doing all the work here. The flag add-on is boob bait. 6/
kewhittington.bsky.social
The EO wants to pretend that there are unanswered legal questions regarding flag burning that opens a door to greater enforcement action. This is a frequent Trump EO tactic, but it is a mirage in this case as in others. 5/
kewhittington.bsky.social
This is unlikely to fly. Flag burning as a type of “fighting word” is a non-starter under existing precedent. Flag-burning adds nothing to actions that otherwise qualify as incitement & flag-burning in itself won’t meet that standard. 4/
kewhittington.bsky.social
There is a pitch that some instances of flag burning might fall under existing 1st Amendment exceptions despite the Court’s ruling that flag burning as such is protected expression. 3/
kewhittington.bsky.social
You start with the ones that will get votes, if you want the articles to pass. You start with the ones that will drive public attention and anger, if you primarily want it for mobilization purposes.
joshtpm.bsky.social
It would be genuinely challenge to draw up articles of impeachment for Trump. There are thousands of individual acts which are abuses of power and almost as many breaking statute law. you wouldn't know where to start.
joshtpm.bsky.social
It would be genuinely challenge to draw up articles of impeachment for Trump. There are thousands of individual acts which are abuses of power and almost as many breaking statute law. you wouldn't know where to start.
kewhittington.bsky.social
Figured it was about time to try the much vaunted New Haven pizza, but guess I’ll have to try again later

References

Fields & subjects

Updated 1m