Scholar

Michael J. Nelson

Michael Nelson is an American political scientist, noted for his work on the Presidency and elections. He is a Fulmer… more

Michael J. Nelson
H-index: 35
Law 40%
Economics 27%

Reposted by: Michael J. Nelson

cambup-polsci.cambridge.org
#OpenAccess from @apsrjournal.bsky.social -

The Path of Law: Legal Uncertainty and Issues of First Impression in the U.S. Courts of Appeals - https://cup.org/42XsrF0

- @anthonytaboni.bsky.social

#FirstView
Banner with the hashtag #OpenAccess on a green background above the name 'American Political Science Review' on a blue background.
mjnelson.bsky.social
(To do the magic trick, start with a regular deck and have different students draw samples and talk about sampling variation. Then switch decks at the podium to the all red deck)
mjnelson.bsky.social
Taught intro to hypothesis testing today in undergrad stats for the first time in a while and this activity is undefeated for giving the intuition for hypothesis testing: jse.amstat.org/v2n1/eckert..... Plus you can do it as a magic trick which makes it fun.
Journal of Statistics Education, V2N1: Eckert
jse.amstat.org
ntd.bsky.social
colleagues in political science. the formal update to the Garand and Giles journal ranking survey is now live. many of you will receive an email momentarily inviting you to participate. in the event you do NOT receive an invitation, please see this website to self-enroll. thanks! sharing = caring!
Participating
The Evaluation of Publication in Political Research study is open to serious producers and consumers of political research, including faculty in institutions of higher education, doctoral students,…
eppr.study
mjnelson.bsky.social
More than you've ever wanted to know about the consequences executives face for defying courts, available for 20% off with discount code TEJR2025 at www.cambridge.org/core/books/e...!
mjnelson.bsky.social
We welcome candidates whose research and teaching address topics including public opinion, electoral behavior, the role of AI in democracy, democratic principles, representation, political participation, political psychology, partisanship, polarization, gender, or race/ethnicity.
mjnelson.bsky.social
We welcome candidates with expertise in any geographic region whose research and teaching address topics, including but not limited to, authoritarianism, democratic backsliding, state repression, contentious politics, and intrastate conflict.

Reposted by: Michael J. Nelson

justinbrno.bsky.social
📢 @davidkosar.bsky.social & Patrick Leisure introduce the concept of judicial overstay ⚖️ and argue that we should pay more attention to this transnational phenomenon 🌍.

📖 Read their new article on the IACL blog ✍️📰
🔗 blog-iacl-aidc.org/2025-posts/2...
mjnelson.bsky.social
It is that time of year where the handout I made about how to read a social science article comes in useful for faculty and students. In case it is helpful for you: mjnelson.org/Teaching/How....
mjnelson.org

Reposted by: Michael J. Nelson

anthonytaboni.bsky.social
Really pleased to announce that my paper "The Path of Law: Legal Uncertainty and Cases of First Impression in the U.S. Courts of Appeals" has been accepted at the APSR. The paper can be found here: anthonytaboni.com/wp-content/u...
annagunderson.bsky.social
Attention #polisky! Apply for
@utaustin.bsky.social LBJ School of Public Affairs with a focus on American Political Institutions. I'm on the committee, so please reach out with questions. See below: apply.interfolio.com/170943
Apply - Interfolio {{$ctrl.$state.data.pageTitle}} - Apply - Interfolio
apply.interfolio.com
mjnelson.bsky.social
The gist (as we've seen over the past few months) is that courts don't have the magic wand to constrain executives that so many often hope.
mjnelson.bsky.social
We draw upon survey data from the U.S., Germany, Poland, and Hungary and find that executives only face pushback from people citizens when those people value the rule of law and when the court is independent.
mjnelson.bsky.social
Thrilled that this book, with Driscoll and Krehbiel, is out this week. Its topic that become surprisingly relevant: under what conditions does the public punish presidents who ignore court decisions?

Reposted by: Michael J. Nelson

respol.bsky.social
@abbymatthews.bsky.social & Rachael Hinkle's analysis of judicial citations demonstrates that diversity in race, gender, *and* partisanship plays a critical role in the evolution of legal doctrine, with judges sharing all 3 salient traits experiencing a 25% increase in citation probability.
Sage Journals: Discover world-class research
Subscription and open access journals from Sage, the world's leading independent academic publisher.
journals.sagepub.com
rachelshelden.bsky.social
Historian friends: tell me about your favorite research & writing tools.

As a bonus, would love to know where you learned how to use them & if you'd be interested in sharing your knowledge w/ others.

Reposted by: Michael J. Nelson

cambup-law.cambridge.org
Explains when, where, and how constitutional courts help citizens hold executives to account and protect the rule of law

The Efficacy of Judicial Review by Amanda Driscoll, Jay N. Krehbiel (@ubuffalo.bsky.social‬), & @mjnelson.bsky.social‬, Out Now

#LawSky 💙📚 #Politics

https://cup.org/4fbNxVd
Statue of Lady Justice

Reposted by: Michael J. Nelson

romanopsci.bsky.social
Big shout out to @mjnelson.bsky.social and Amanda Driscoll for putting on another stellar CWC yesterday. Such a great snapshot of important works in judicial politics. Much more to come also at #SPSA2024.

Reposted by: Michael J. Nelson

niskanencenter.bsky.social
Every two weeks, @mattgrossmann.bsky.social reviews what's new in political science research, especially as it relates to national headlines.

Don't miss his Science of Politics podcast.
mattgrossmann.bsky.social
Can judicial review stop a lawless executive?

Americans have faith in rule of law & respond to courts that invalidate executive action, even with partisanship

New #ScienceOfPolitics pod/transcript with Amanda Driscoll, Michael Nelson, Jay Krehbiel
www.niskanencenter.org/can-judicial...
Can judicial review stop a lawless executive? - Niskanen Center
Courts are pausing dozens of Trump administration actions—from mass firings to agency shutdowns. But does the judiciary have a real enforcement mechanism?
www.niskanencenter.org

Reposted by: Michael J. Nelson

respol.bsky.social
Political science suggests liberals are more tolerant of the Supreme Court when it makes decisions they don't like. Kathryn Haglin, Soren Jordan, Alison Higgins Merrill and @joeura.bsky.social ask: does that still hold up with the new-look Court?

Read more: journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10....
Sage Journals: Discover world-class research
Subscription and open access journals from Sage, the world's leading independent academic publisher.
journals.sagepub.com
david.opensecrets.org
We are hiring at @opensecrets.org! If you are interested in working with and analyzing large datasets - and you care about government transparency and accountability - apply now to join our research team. www.opensecrets.org/about/jobs?1
Jobs
www.opensecrets.org
mjnelson.bsky.social
For folks looking for some stats about the Court, Epstein, Martin, and I have a preliminary report on the term: static1.squarespace.com/static/60188.... Hopefully this will be useful for teaching. SCDB data update will be out in August.

References

Fields & subjects

Updated 1m