Scholar

Rob Boddice

H-index: 18
History 49%
Philosophy 29%
boddice.bsky.social
The Tylenol thing is just another way to put women and children at risk and to underrate pain. These guys are essentially "let the weak go to the wall" pseudo social Darwinists. It was stupid when Wallace did it and it is evil now.
boddice.bsky.social
since it's 25C in Berlin and I have covid, I'm kind of celebrating not getting a place via the marathon lottery
boddice.bsky.social
looking up Andrea Železna, javelin thrower, to see if she is related to Jan Železny and finding that yes, she is, but not in the way I'd expected
boddice.bsky.social
Dose no. 8. The "mysterious" bug going around really ain't a mystery.
boddice.bsky.social
have a great day. I'm missing it with presumptive covid.
boddice.bsky.social
It's been a useless site for ages anyway. Deleted.
nposegay.bsky.social
I'm sorry, worldwide, irrevocable, non-exclusive, transferable permission to my voice and likeness? For what now? In any manner for any purpose???

This is in academia/.edu's new ToS, which you're prompted to agree to on login. Anyway I'll be jumping ship. You can find my stuff at hcommons.org.
By creating an Account with Academia.edu, you grant us a worldwide, irrevocable, non-exclusive, transferable license, permission, and consent for Academia.edu to use your Member Content and your personal information (including, but not limited to, your name, voice, signature, photograph, likeness, city, institutional affiliations, citations, mentions, publications, and areas of interest) in any manner, including for the purpose of advertising, selling, or soliciting the use or purchase of Academia.edu's Services.
djrgrey.bsky.social
Reminder Fellows of @royalhistsoc.org have til 26 September to vote in upcoming Council elections! 🗳️ There's lots of great candidates & all committed to the field. Obvs ideally I'd like to be your choice 😜 But vital to vote for who you feel will represent you & profession #skystorians #academicsky
boddice.bsky.social
Recently had to convert a piece into APA style and thought that seemed pretty hideous for a historian. But now I'm converting a piece into an esoteric Austrian style and it is wild. Wild, I say.

Reposted by: Rob Boddice

hexhandbook.bsky.social
Join us @hexhistory.bsky.social at the end of the month for the 2nd Hex Handbook Distinguished lecture, by Corinne Saunders
boddice.bsky.social
yeah, and we all bite, eh? I think it's actually a special kind of ignorance combined with a special kind of arrogance. Lethal cocktail when well funded.
boddice.bsky.social
they don't learn because they still don't know we exist. By now, Nature has serious form.
boddice.bsky.social
Or perhaps, encore une fois, avec sensibilité!
boddice.bsky.social
well, I'm not sure "emotion" is an appropriate category at all. One would need to assess the dynamic interplay of raison, passion, sensibilité and mentalité in the specific context of gendered humoral bodies. The whole premise of the study is bogus.
boddice.bsky.social
Increasingly finding that my brain has no capacity for reading or following basic instructions.
boddice.bsky.social
Happiness has many more meanings besides and can't be divorced from the situated politics in which it is entangled. Pain is no less complex. One could argue that modern (since C18) happiness has been about economic satisfaction (serving whom?!); and pain (grief) is defined by failure to comply.
nicolecrust.bsky.social
So many emotion terms have double meanings. Like *happiness* as "living virtuously" (eudaimonic) vs happiness as "the pursuit of pleasure not pain" (hedonic).

Nontrivial progress in the neurosci. of the 2nd is in scope for this era, I think. (How! Exciting!).

link.springer.com/article/10.3...
Insightful reflections about the happiness concept and its semantic space may be drawn from psychological research. Scholars working in this field have conceptualized happiness on the basis of two approaches: eudaimonic and hedonic (Deci & Ryan, 2008; Haybron, 2008; McMahon, 2006; Ryan & Deci, 2000; Sotgiu, 2013;White,2006). Eudaimonic happiness is a concept originally defined by Aristotle in his Nicomachean Ethics. He stated that happiness is only attainable by living virtuously. Similarly, on the basis of Stoicism, Seneca and Epictetus affirmed that the main path to happiness is through virtuous living, by facing and resisting temptations that could corrupt personal inner harmony. The eudaimonic trend was followed by Christian philosophers including Augustine and Tommaso d’Aquino. Conversely, hedonic happiness is a concept that refers to the Cyrenaic school of Aristippus and Epicurus, who considered the pursuit of pleasure and the avoidance of pain to be the main path to happiness.

Reposted by: Rob Boddice

nicolecrust.bsky.social
So many emotion terms have double meanings. Like *happiness* as "living virtuously" (eudaimonic) vs happiness as "the pursuit of pleasure not pain" (hedonic).

Nontrivial progress in the neurosci. of the 2nd is in scope for this era, I think. (How! Exciting!).

link.springer.com/article/10.3...
Insightful reflections about the happiness concept and its semantic space may be drawn from psychological research. Scholars working in this field have conceptualized happiness on the basis of two approaches: eudaimonic and hedonic (Deci & Ryan, 2008; Haybron, 2008; McMahon, 2006; Ryan & Deci, 2000; Sotgiu, 2013;White,2006). Eudaimonic happiness is a concept originally defined by Aristotle in his Nicomachean Ethics. He stated that happiness is only attainable by living virtuously. Similarly, on the basis of Stoicism, Seneca and Epictetus affirmed that the main path to happiness is through virtuous living, by facing and resisting temptations that could corrupt personal inner harmony. The eudaimonic trend was followed by Christian philosophers including Augustine and Tommaso d’Aquino. Conversely, hedonic happiness is a concept that refers to the Cyrenaic school of Aristippus and Epicurus, who considered the pursuit of pleasure and the avoidance of pain to be the main path to happiness.
boddice.bsky.social
This must be the worst mugging ever at the University of Chicago.
boddice.bsky.social
Die Hard is perfect.
Annie Hall.
One, Two, Three.
Das Leben der Anderen.
Lawrence of Arabia.
Godfather 2.
fleerultra.bsky.social
in your opinion, completely subjective, no metrics and no judgment, what are the best written movies of all time? I don't care if you have never seen a screenplay in your life, just which story itself is the most moving and complete and perfect to you?

References

Fields & subjects

Updated 1m