elisa freschi
banner
elisafreschi.bsky.social
elisa freschi
@elisafreschi.bsky.social

Sanskrit (and) philosophy. Permanently in beta phase. Blogging at http://elisafreschi.com and http://indianphilosophyblog.org. Articles at PhilPapers Here to learn & share

Philosophy 47%
History 21%

This was a particularly good one, that I am going to assign to students while we discuss Pascal.
First #HoPWaG of the year on early modern philosophy. It's a fun one: what contemporary philosophers have made of Pascal's wager! Would it make sense to bet on the existence of God just because the payoffs are better?

www.historyofphilosophy.net/pascals-wager

#philsky #philosophy #podcasts

not Francis Bacon?
The collected writings of Michel Foucault are now available in abridged form in fortune cookies:

I have already encountered two recommendation letters from a prof. who declares to only write 2 letters per year… mmmh… suspicious?

New low: recommendation letters praising students because they gave good avice about a certain city. I understand that you want to praise the student's generosity and helpfulness, but could you stay on topic, please?

I agree, but grades are uniformly inflated and writing samples might have been nearly co-authored by professors (not even starting with gen-AI). So, what do we have, especially when it comes to getting an idea of the student as a person (honest Q, would appreciate advice)?

Reposted by Elisa Freschi

The collected writings of Michel Foucault are now available in abridged form in fortune cookies:

Reading recommendation letters is at times surprising, since some appear to be praising themselves more than the student, e.g., by explaining how tough their book is (which the class the student attended was focusing on).

Reposted by Elisa Freschi

First #HoPWaG of the year on early modern philosophy. It's a fun one: what contemporary philosophers have made of Pascal's wager! Would it make sense to bet on the existence of God just because the payoffs are better?

www.historyofphilosophy.net/pascals-wager

#philsky #philosophy #podcasts

Reposted by Elisa Freschi

The Barcelona Principles propose some simple actions to create a less unequal play field between native speakers and non native speakers of English in philosophy. First among them: reviewers should not assess papers based on style. contesi.info/bp/
BARCELONA PRINCIPLES FOR A GLOBALLY INCLUSIVE PHILOSOPHY
We acknowledge that English is the common vehicular language of much contemporary philosophy, especially in the tradition of so-called “analytic” or “Anglo-American” philosophy. This tradition is i…
contesi.info

Thank you, this works!

Still "this content is only for subscribers"…

Reposted by Elisa Freschi

Noli me tangere: do not touch, for I have not yet risen to my father. Intense & unsettling moment in the Arena Chapel by Giotto, who died this day in 1337.

tvam evāttha (with āttha being a perfect from āh-). But since AI is just a statistical device and not enough people have looked for it, it just gave me two similarly sounding (but completely unrelated) results, with absolute confidence.

Sure, let's use AI to translate Sanskrit:
""Tvam evāttha" (तुम एवार्थ) ist eine verkürzte Form oder ein Teil des berühmten Sanskrit-Mantra-Verses, der mit "Tvam eva mata ca pita tvam eva" beginnt, was bedeutet: "Du bist die Mutter, Du bist der Vater" und "Du bist mein Alles" […]."
Re: the AI slop paper shared by @thomaspellard.bsky.social and @lameensouag.bsky.social, I wrote to the editors — will update when I get a reply, and will be following closely what they do.

Key point is that we should hold the *journal* accountable for this mess

I have a few predictions...

1/n

Reposted by James A. Benn

On the latest episode of Knowing Animals, I interview Walter Veit (@walterveit.bsky.social) about his 2023 Routledge book A Philosophy for the Science of Animal Consciousness. The episode is available free below, or in all the usual podcast places.

knowinganimals.libsyn.com/episode-245-...

@perusall.com : I am not sure that the new version is an improvement. It no longer works on Safari and even on Chrome I can no longer create a "Test Student".

Reposted by Elisa Freschi

Pulling no punches in the syllabus. I am so tired.
On the latest episode of Knowing Animals, I interview Walter Veit (@walterveit.bsky.social) about his 2023 Routledge book A Philosophy for the Science of Animal Consciousness. The episode is available free below, or in all the usual podcast places.

knowinganimals.libsyn.com/episode-245-...

Reposted by Elisa Freschi

A 19 year old asked ChatGPT for advice on taking recreational drugs.

Over a period of 18 months, ChatGPT advised him which drugs to take, how much to ingest and even curated playlists for his trips.

He died from an overdose recommended by the chatbot

#chatgpt #chatbots #AI
A Calif. teen trusted ChatGPT for drug advice. He died from an overdose.
"Who on earth gives that advice?"
www.sfgate.com
He put his complete trust in a chat bot that turned him into a savage murderer.
Disturbing Messages Show ChatGPT Encouraging a Murder, Lawsuit Alleges
A lawsuit against OpenAI reveals the chilling ChatGPT messages that drove a middle aged man to kill his 83-year-old mother.
trib.al

I know that this is for fun & I am yet to listen to the podcast, but it still raises an interesting point. Imho, whenever we (=scholars dealing w philosophy outside of NA-EU) are asked to summarise a whole field within a few minutes episode we should start by warning the audience abt its immensity

What could go wrong?

(correction in the alt-text: Read "Harvard" instead of "the Hamilton school")

Short and non-polemical Q: is Hankins implying that "civilisation" is = "Western civilisation", so that teaching world history *necessarily* means creating uncivilised students? Pls notice that I am not claiming that this cannot happen, I'm wondering whether acc to him it *happens necessarily*

exactly! We need to start each class telling them the immensity of what is left out of them!

Some people have been fed a diet of extreme diversity within the Euro-American canon and nearly no diversity elsewhere. It is also convenient because it reinforces existent hiring policies.

They clearly think that by "love-bombing" hundreds of professors they will get at least a few positive answers. I would recommend tailoring their emails and only writing to the profs they are really interested in working with.
(I get many of them too).

Reposted by Martin Lenz