Upzone the coastal elites
@aboutdave.bsky.social
570 followers 210 following 3.5K posts
Patent attorney, astrophysicist, & Stack-and-Packist 🏙️🥑🔋⛷️. Ready to help enforce state housing law.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
aboutdave.bsky.social
"I know what's easier than fighting capital, fighting capital."
aboutdave.bsky.social
I'm not willing to give up on improving the amount of housing available while we wait for a socialist revolution. Even then, there's a structural deficiency of homes. We'd be trading prices for wait-lists.
aboutdave.bsky.social
That's not at all how abundance works.

Density should be apartments and condos.
aboutdave.bsky.social
I answered this.

bsky.app/profile/abou...
aboutdave.bsky.social
I am not a renter right now. I may be in the future. I don't want to be forced into either being an owner or a rental.

choice through abundance
aboutdave.bsky.social
I am not a renter right now. I may be in the future. I don't want to be forced into either being an owner or a rental.

choice through abundance
aboutdave.bsky.social
I wouldn't want whether I can afford a home to come about because it was illegal for that home to be a rental.
aboutdave.bsky.social
Not everyone wants to buy every home they're going to live in during their life.

I own my current home, although I genuinely think that's irrelevant to this discussion.
aboutdave.bsky.social
I'm saying that aspect of your approach is zero sum.

I want people to be able to afford either option. Both renting and owning can be cheaper with abundance.
aboutdave.bsky.social
I want to reduce housing costs for all, not in the zero sum sense of hurting renters to benefit owner occupiers.
aboutdave.bsky.social
What happens to renters there?

What happens when a neighborhood only allows owner-occupiers?

Higher rents in the remaining locations and an inability for renters to live in certain neighborhoods. Bad!
aboutdave.bsky.social
I get that it helps people buy homes, at the expense of having less rental homes. So that's bad.

But I think it also hurts builders, because now they can't sell to some entities. Double bad.
aboutdave.bsky.social
So let's circle back.

How does blocking private equity help build housing?

bsky.app/profile/eiko...
eikonos.bsky.social
private equity should not be allowed to own residential at all
aboutdave.bsky.social
HCD enforcement on the issue started strong, with a technical assistant letter confirming they had just 30 days under CEQA law to make exemption determinations.

Then went to shit as HCD ignored continued violations, and even violated HCD's own rules to hand them a pro-housing designation.
aboutdave.bsky.social
I started my housing advocacy by showing up to Berkeley zoning boards, highlighting their staff reports included a CEQA exemption determination, but they had blown by the PSA deadlines that triggered.

They illegally stopped giving those determinations to avoid the consequences.

That's over now.
cafedujord.bsky.social
Important to remember that not only did we pass #SB79, the biggest transit-oriented upzoning bill ever, we also passed a clean CEQA exemption for new multifamily infill housing.

This is, bar none, the biggest year in state action on housing policy reform in California history. Not even close.
aboutdave.bsky.social
Builders will come out of the woodwork if we let them.
aboutdave.bsky.social
I don't care, it's an existential crisis.

Thankfully, Newsom signed sb79.
aboutdave.bsky.social
Bingo. Private equity is powerless in the face of the homeowner cartel.
aboutdave.bsky.social
Yeah, and that particular purpose was segregation and exclusion.
aboutdave.bsky.social
Ok, your first said we were building, which implied we'd taken significant steps, or even as many steps as possible, to make housing legal.

And we haven't. Just barely started reforms.
aboutdave.bsky.social
Private equity has basically zero control over zoning in our cities.

Private equity didn't make the LA city council oppose sb79.
Reposted by Upzone the coastal elites
lostsubways.com
One note about SB79: the tiny, NIMBY-est cities in California got hit the hardest, since it's much harder to play with the zoning. SB79 allows cities to reallocate their zoning "budget" to other stations, but that's not much help when you only have 1-2 stations! It's clever jujitsu.

Thread: 1/
Reposted by Upzone the coastal elites
stano.bsky.social
Not exaggerating when I say that SB 79, a bill making it easier to build housing near mass transit, is the most consequential piece of legislation that the Democratic Party has passed all year. Saying no to the worst people in our coalition proves we're serious about the future.
aboutdave.bsky.social
We have a housing shortage and you're not approaching it seriously.