Dave Addison
@daveaddison.bsky.social
720 followers 410 following 110 posts
Historian of Late Antiquity. British Academy Postdoc at University of Liverpool. Hispanophile, Leodensian. https://www.liverpool.ac.uk/people/david-addison
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
daveaddison.bsky.social
Yes, I agree. I wasn't arguing against you in particular. We might well have no disagreement.
daveaddison.bsky.social
I sense, however, some unspoken assumptions in the comments in this thread - specifically that DH was worthy of greater funding than other forms of intellectual labour. If I was over interpreting, that's on me, but I haven't been convinced that I was.
daveaddison.bsky.social
Given the political situation, I have an enormous amount of sympathy with those who have lost funding. I have no sympathy for the manner in which the cuts have been made or the rationale behind them, which I can only see as anti-intellectual and anti-scientific.
daveaddison.bsky.social
(I have no views on the particular expenses of this grant, about which I know nothing, but I do wonder about the intellectual consequences of the apparently prevalent assumption that DH projects are the natural recipients of such prestigious grants).
daveaddison.bsky.social
All of which is to say that I am less alarmed than some commenters on this thread when grants go to people without DH outcomes. I worry about the intellectual effects of prioritising expensive work.
daveaddison.bsky.social
I get that, and I think the exclusion of DH from NEH grants is ridiculous. But I also know that hiring decisions in cash-poor universities are often informed by the size of previous grants, and I worry about the consequences of certain sub-fields systematically drawing more money than others.
daveaddison.bsky.social
Is the idea here that digital humanities deserves, as a matter of course, all the biggest and most prestigious grants?
daveaddison.bsky.social
I think you might benefit from googling Lee Mordechai
daveaddison.bsky.social
Well people can read the pieces and make their mind up. I've said my piece. You have a good day, too!
daveaddison.bsky.social
Fwiw I'm don't even follow the Eisenberg-Mordechai in my own work, but the idea that they are anti science is just false. They accept the aDNA evidence for Y. Pestis, but contest the way a relatively small number of cases are generalized. I have different views, but they made an imp point.
daveaddison.bsky.social
From what I know of Merle's politics I would be amazed if the intention was to lessen the severity of the Covid pandemic, but I don't have any insider info and I can't read the tea leaves. He's on here; I imagine he'll make his case.
daveaddison.bsky.social
I don't think that's the message your (now deleted) skeet sent. Glad you thought twice about it.
daveaddison.bsky.social
Yeah, it's interesting work! Great to teach with
daveaddison.bsky.social
See also this from his faculty page
daveaddison.bsky.social
2019, I think, unless we're thinking of different work - but yes, this is exactly the point!
daveaddison.bsky.social
I wonder about the value-add of university research on certain bits of pop culture, when journalism/blog/fans are doing an equally good if not better job already. Whereas some culture (e.g. that from very different times/places) might require university exposition in order to be accessible.
daveaddison.bsky.social
Agreed, and have no beef with Taylor Swift studies. But I suppose my slight hesitation with poptimism in a university setting is that certain cultural entities would die without the infrastructure of universities and arts schools and conservatoires around them, and others wouldn't.
daveaddison.bsky.social
Wild stat in the FT: Coventry University spend 12% of *all* annual expenditure paying fees to middle-men who recruit international students 🤯
daveaddison.bsky.social
Ah, that's the model? I'm out of touch
daveaddison.bsky.social
I agree entirely. I wonder how much of this is downstream of output-based metrics in wider university cultures. It seems hard for people at the moment to talk with a straight face about the development people and minds and practices as a goal of education or research.
daveaddison.bsky.social
Do you have a sense of who the target for this kind of messaging is? I've heard these views from plenty of self-declared iconoclasts in university policy, but I struggle to see who the wider constituency is ... But presumably there is *some* method here?!
daveaddison.bsky.social
I genuinely don't understand who this kind of messaging from Kyle is for. Do red wall voters dream of Silicon valley in the fens? Are Economist subscribers a major voting bloc? Or does he just spend too much time talking fifteen or so guys from a handful of think tanks?
dylandifford.bsky.social
Lol. How well did the last govt insulting load-bearing parts of their electoral coalition work out for them? Like they watched what the Lib Dems did to the home counties and wondered what it'd be like if the Greens did that to the two dozen largest university towns.
colinmurray.bsky.social
Right. My students working two part time jobs and/or having an hour and a half commute to uni because they have to live at home due to the cost of student accommodation lack drive and vigour. Sure thing, Peter. The UK Govt still haven't a clue about the realities of universities today.