Jackie Gardina
@jackiegardina.bsky.social
1.9K followers 3.2K following 2.4K posts
Higher ed supporter, podcast host, and a law and politics junkie with a social justice focus. *All opinions are my own
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
jackiegardina.bsky.social
I'm starting a thread with the legal profession's response to President Trump's attacks on it. Please feel free to add any that I miss.

I'll start with Perkins Coie's response.They have created an entire website so that we can follow along. 1/
www.perkinscoiefacts.com?gad_source=1...
Perkins Coie’s response to the unlawful Executive Order targeting the firm
The order violates core constitutional protections, including the rights to free speech and due process, and undermines all clients’ right to select counsel of their choice.
www.perkinscoiefacts.com
Reposted by Jackie Gardina
marcelias.bsky.social
If you are a paying subscriber to The Washington Post, this is what you get.

If you are a free subscriber to Democracy Docket, this is what you get.

Support independent, pro-democracy media. Sign up now. hubs.ly/Q03M8rql0
Reposted by Jackie Gardina
replamonica.bsky.social
During a shutdown, people like TSA workers and troops don’t get paid. But do you know who does? The president still gets paid. Members of Congress still get paid. It’s wrong. That’s why, as soon as the Republicans shut down the government, I put my salary on hold.
Reposted by Jackie Gardina
rlspang.bsky.social
MIT says "NOPE, we stand for peer review, merit, and academic freedom" in reply to the Trump Regime's proposed "compact" with Higher Ed. orgchart.mit.edu/letters/rega...
Regarding the Compact | MIT Organization Chart
orgchart.mit.edu
Reposted by Jackie Gardina
chanda.blacksky.app
MIT President Sally Kornbluth just issued a statement to the campus community saying NO to Trump’s authoritarian compact

“And fundamentally, the premise of the document is inconsistent with our core belief that scientific funding should be based on scientific merit alone.”
Dear Madam Secretary,
I write in response to your letter of October 1, inviting MIT to review a "Compact for Academic Excellence in Higher Education." I acknowledge the vital importance of these matters.
I appreciated the chance to meet with you earlier this year to discuss the priorities we share for American higher education.
As we discussed, the Institute's mission of service to the nation directs us to advance knowledge, educate students and bring knowledge to bear on the world's great challenges. We do that in line with a clear set of values, with excellence above all. Some practical examples:
• MIT prides itself on rewarding merit.
Students, faculty and staff succeed here based on the strength of their talent, ideas and hard work. For instance, the Institute
was the first to reinstate the SAT/ACT requirement after the pandemic. And MIT has never had legacy preferences in admissions. • MIT opens its doors to the most talented students regardless of their family's finances. Admissions are need-blind. Incoming undergraduates whose families earn less than $200,000 a year pay no tuition. Nearly 88% of our last graduating class left MIT with no debt for their education. We make a wealth of free courses and low-cost certificates available
to any American with an internet
connection. Of the undergraduate degrees we award, 94% are in STEM fields. And in service to the nation, we cap enrollment of international undergraduates at roughly
10%.
• We value free expression, as clearly described in the MIT Statement on Freedom of Expression and Academic Freedom. We must hear facts and opinions we don't like - and engage respectfully with those with whom we disagree. These values and other MIT practices meet or exceed many standards outlined in the document you sent. We freely choose these values because they're right, and we live by them because they support our mission - work of immense value to the prosperity, competitiveness, health and security of the United States. And of course, MIT abides by the law.
The document also includes principles with which we disagree, including those that would restrict freedom of expression and our independence as an institution. And fundamentally, the premise of the document is inconsistent with our core belief that scientific
funding should be based on scientific merit alone.
In our view, America's leadership in science and innovation depends on independent thinking and open competition for excellence. In that tree marketplace of ideas, the people of MIT gladly compete with the very best, without preferences.
Therefore, with respect, we cannot support the proposed approach to addressing the issues facing higher education. As you know, MIT's record of service to the nation is long and enduring. Eight decades ago, MIT leaders helped invent a scientific partnership between America's research universities and the
U.S. government that has delivered extraordinary benefits for the American people.
We continue to believe in the power of this partnership to serve the nation.
Sincerely,
Sally Kornbluth
CC
Ms. May Mailman
Mr. Vincent Haley
Reposted by Jackie Gardina
leahlitman.bsky.social
From the Supreme Court opinion granting Trump immunity:

"Investigative & prosecutorial decisionmaking is the special province of the Executive ... allegations that the requested investigations were shams or proposed for an improper purpose do not divest the President of [his] exclusive authority"
jackiegardina.bsky.social
I am connected to @topa-the-bt.bsky.social. He isn't on here much but I will let him know he has pals here. 😀
Reposted by Jackie Gardina
jameeljaffer.bsky.social
Any university that agrees to this outrageous “compact” is a full participant in Trump’s assault on democracy. www.thecrimson.com/article/2025...
jackiegardina.bsky.social
So we’ve moved on from Democrats want to insure undocumented people to repeal and replace again?
atrupar.com
Thune: "The president would like to overhaul Obamacare and give people health insurance that is higher quality and more affordable."
Reposted by Jackie Gardina
Reposted by Jackie Gardina
sifill.bsky.social
This is important.
carlzimmer.com
Today my @nytimes.com colleagues and I are launching a new series called Lost Science. We interview US scientists who can no longer discover something new about our world, thanks to this year‘s cuts. Here is my first interview with a scientist who studied bees and fires. Gift link: nyti.ms/3IWXbiE
nyti.ms
Reposted by Jackie Gardina
ruaaup-aft.bsky.social
This week, our colleague Dr. Mark Bray came under attack by Turning Point USA’s Rutgers chapter for his public scholarship. Rutgers AAUP-AFT and the Rutgers Adjunct Faculty Union condemn this campaign and stand in solidarity with our colleagues. Read our full statement here: https://loom.ly/BDXasRY
jackiegardina.bsky.social
I just listened to former FBI agent @michaelfeinberg.bsky.social and @nytimes.com reporter Devlin Barrett discuss the politicization of the FBI. Feinberg worked counterintelligence and gave a damning assessment of our current state. @hillcenterdc.bsky.social

I will not sleep tonight.
A picture of reporter Devlin Barrett and former FBI agent Michael Feinberg.
jackiegardina.bsky.social
That’s the one I was thinking of. As well as Barre (VT). I’ve lived in both states.
jackiegardina.bsky.social
We met a wonderful group of people across the globe who own Border Terriers called the #btposse. We have even visited them in England, Scotland, Ireland, and parts of the US. It has been a joy.
conradhackett.bsky.social
Has anything great happened in your life because of social media?
Reposted by Jackie Gardina
chrismurphyct.bsky.social
We aren't on the verge of an authoritarian takeover. We are in the middle of it.

But I worry people don't see the whole scheme. They just pay attention to each new daily outrage. So I went to the Senate floor to explain Trump's plan.

Here's a 🧵of the speech. It's important.
jackiegardina.bsky.social
I access several papers through the public library website, including the WaPo. It is a good alternative.
Reposted by Jackie Gardina
jvagle.me
“The best defense against this weapon is solidarity among groups who disagree ferociously on many questions, but who agree on the need to keep America democratic and rebuild institutions and social connections to make democracy more robust”

www.nytimes.com/2025/10/08/o...
Opinion | You Beat Trumpism by Banding Together. It’s as Hard and as Simple as That.
www.nytimes.com
Reposted by Jackie Gardina
repjamesclyburn.bsky.social
Americans across the country enrolled in an ACA plan are already being notified that their monthly premiums will skyrocket beginning next year.

If this has happened to you, please comment what you or your family’s current premium is and what it will rise to next year.
jackiegardina.bsky.social
You can add the Bluebook to that list.

bsky.app/profile/jack...
jackiegardina.bsky.social
Only law professors and lawyers can appreciate this. In a “free library” in Washington, DC, someone has offered the Bluebook. #lawsky #appellatesky
Reposted by Jackie Gardina
joshpasek.com
How should university boards prepare?

- Strategize in advance (could happen here)
- Leverage internal expertise (strategize with political scientists, public policy scholars and law faculty)
- Respond collectively and support one another
-Stay true to the mission

This is the real fiduciary duty!