if you do i will buy you a small cake and we can be friends
director: medicalevidenceproject.org
the book: forensicmetascience.com
Can you see the problem?
Can you see the problem?
A kind of beautiful tiered wedding cake of misconceptions.
Just BATHE in the warm rolling folds of daftness.
Johnson, on a quest to live forever, wants “competing for the best biomarkers of anybody in the world” to be something of a new sport.
A kind of beautiful tiered wedding cake of misconceptions.
Just BATHE in the warm rolling folds of daftness.
DOES THIS WESTERN BLOT LOOK MORE LIKE A FISH OR A SHOE.
DOES THIS WESTERN BLOT LOOK MORE LIKE A FISH OR A SHOE.
DOES THIS WESTERN BLOT LOOK MORE LIKE A FISH OR A SHOE.
Get ready for more live posting!
#AIMOS2025
aimos-inc.github.io/aimos.confer...
Get ready for more live posting!
#AIMOS2025
aimos-inc.github.io/aimos.confer...
Over several years we have caught MANY researchers playing silly buggers with artificial cutoffs designed to engineer group differences.
(No one more so than the Vitamin D weirdos. One of the least reliable and most annoying areas of health research.)
Over several years we have caught MANY researchers playing silly buggers with artificial cutoffs designed to engineer group differences.
(No one more so than the Vitamin D weirdos. One of the least reliable and most annoying areas of health research.)
link.springer.com/article/10.1...
link.springer.com/article/10.1...
I am not enjoying the implications of this.
I am not enjoying the implications of this.
(She died herself in 2021.)
I’m not rehashing all the ludicrous offensive shit he believed. You’ve heard it.
www.statnews.com/2025/11/07/j...
(She died herself in 2021.)
I’m not rehashing all the ludicrous offensive shit he believed. You’ve heard it.
www.statnews.com/2025/11/07/j...
Further reading, @reeserichardson.bsky.social may have more:
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
... and hilariously a 'bibliometric' analysis that doesn't mention paper mills:
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC...
Further reading, @reeserichardson.bsky.social may have more:
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
... and hilariously a 'bibliometric' analysis that doesn't mention paper mills:
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC...
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1...
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1...
This is not that day.
This is not that day.
1. This is bone idle useless image manipulation - detectable, obvious after you learn to look for it.
2. It’s a lower bound.
The phrase is “a minimum of 40% of this literature contains easily detectable image manipulation”.
Sleep well.
We have to face up to the fact that in some fields, over half of published science might be fake.
Voor @voxweb.bsky.social.
www.voxweb.nl/nieuws/honde...
1. This is bone idle useless image manipulation - detectable, obvious after you learn to look for it.
2. It’s a lower bound.
The phrase is “a minimum of 40% of this literature contains easily detectable image manipulation”.
Sleep well.
Cureus has had an outsized impact on the sheer volume of nonsense research for years, and I wonder if WoS felt like they had a choice.
I won't miss it.
retractionwatch.com/2025/10/27/e...
Cureus has had an outsized impact on the sheer volume of nonsense research for years, and I wonder if WoS felt like they had a choice.
I won't miss it.
retractionwatch.com/2025/10/27/e...