Joe Paulson
banner
joepaulson2.bsky.social
Joe Paulson
@joepaulson2.bsky.social
260 followers 230 following 7K posts
I am from NYC and like to read and engage about a range of subjects, including history, the Supreme Court, politics, and the Mets. Let's see how this goes. Pronouns: He/Him. I have much content online including at Joe's Substack and Teach N Thrive.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
What do his fake couple friends think about this?
Even Jeffries, who is LAME, eventually endorsed Mamdani
Reposted by Joe Paulson
Senate Republicans blocked a resolution demanding full funding for SNAP benefits.

This, as Trump still refuses to fully restore SNAP to 42 million Americans.

As we head into the midterms, don't forget: GOP lawmakers are fully complicit with Trump's weaponization of hunger.
"If it's not like establishing the Church of England, it's not a violation of the Establishment Clause."

Trump supporter. Wants to overturn school prayer cases.

Let's have public schools have teacher-led Baptist prayer.
Dallas kicker misses a 68-yard FG.

Offers to retire. "I'm a failure." #MNF

(#NotReally)
Reposted by Joe Paulson
He should hold a block party with lots of dancing somewhere and call it "Shakira law"
17-7, and 7 is a special teams fail on Arizona's part. #MNF

Better keep on scoring, Arizona.
Hint: if Trump, Elon Musk, and George Santos endorse someone (Andrew Cuomo), you might have a problem.

www.cityandstateny.com/politics/202...
The book review reminds us that basic cliches about how the judiciary operates have problems.

For instance, good behavior tenure without a retirement age or term limit is far from necessary to further certain ends.

It reaffirms a hobbyhorse -- we need to know more about other legal systems.
Barrett pretending she is above the fray is particularly annoying in that she obviously is not. She was chosen for a particular reason. She repeatedly fulfilled her "mission" in that respect.
Breyer, to be clear, does not say judging is "pure law."

He is aboveboard in that he supports certain values.

His analysis has issues. His latest is boring. But he is honest about that. Also, his earlier work, "Active Liberty," is decent. It is helpfully short.
Multiple "reasonable" conservative legal writers have endorsed this book, one saying it should be a go-to book for the average reader to understand #SCOTUS. If she is full of it, you know, that seems a bit off.

washingtonmonthly.com/2025/11/02/a...
Okay, when Kavanaugh is more annoying than Gorsuch, it's notable. TBF, they are both annoying, in their own ways. #SCOTUS
At one point, Kavanaugh got so frustrated at Gorsuch (for posing a *mildly* difficult question to the contractor) that he tried to jump in and cut him off. Gorsuch wouldn't stand down, telling Kavanaugh: "You’re gonna have your shot, my friend." You can tell several other justices are also annoyed.
It's still hard for NYC Republicans to vote for ANDREW CUOMO.

Republicans might not like Trump in various ways and hold their nose to vote for a Republican. He is going to support their basic platform.

Cuomo is a Democrat. It's just hard. Sliwa is going to get some votes.
Trump with a prudential take -- even if Republicans think Curtis Sliwa's platform is better than Cuomo's (whose positions overlap with Mamdani on many issues), functionally that would be a vote for Mamdani. Paying Peter by robbing Paul, so to speak. That's TRUE actually! Ha ha. #VoteMamdani
www.aol.com/news/fact-ch...

Fact check: 18 false claims Trump made on ‘60 Minutes’
Another bit of context -- the district judge was a maverick and decided the Establishment Clause was not applied to the states. The narrow question was not what the case was truly "about" once it reached #SCOTUS.
She's 85. She's no longer in leadership. I'm not a big fan of her replacement, but he had time to get his feet wet. It's not exactly an at-risk district, is it? It's time.

www.nbcnews.com/politics/con...
a woman is hugging another woman with the words " i mean it 's the end of an era "
Alt: a woman is hugging another woman with the words " i mean it 's the end of an era "
media.tenor.com
Stevens wrote the opinion & has 53 footnotes. He loved this sort of case.
"So your limited argument isn't really the point, right?"

No. I don't have to go all the way to win my case.
These cases always bring questions where the most innocent thing is cited, and if you oppose "x," you apparently have to oppose that. It's a slippery slope parlor game.

Oppose the Lord's Prayer, led by teachers? What about "In God We Trust" on money? Huh?
The emphasis was on "prayer" (what is prayer? Is it any communication with your god, even yelling at god, a prayer?), but I would argue that singling out "meditation" was a problem too. A prayer supporter might say, "What about me?"

Just have a moment of silence. Don't encourage specific things!
Sometimes (Oyez.com had a feature once addressing this), you feel you can argue a point better.

The issue in the case ultimately is that certain religious practices are singled out. It is not just a moment of silence law.

Children can do many things during that moment. Two things were favored.