Rob Mullins
robertmullins.bsky.social
Rob Mullins
@robertmullins.bsky.social
Associate Professor, University of Queensland. My views are not the views of my employer.
Pinned
My article "Does Nature Need Rights?" (coauthored with the wonderful Lulu Weis), forthcoming in the OJLS, is now available open access: academic.oup.com/ojls/advance...
Does Nature Need Rights?
Abstract. Rights of nature (RoN) appear to provide a promising alternative to anthropocentric environmental rights. But do they meet the demands of transfo
academic.oup.com
What gets me about both the reporting and the judge's language is that even supposing "gender ideology" is some sort of religious belief, you would be more respectful of someone's religious belief than this. "..born Robert Prevost but now identifying as 'Pope Leo'".
They keep fucking editing the article, but it's not any better. And this addition about why the judge referred to her as "them" is like a parody of impartiality
November 25, 2025 at 9:04 PM
I'm going to repeat my request that any of my current or former colleagues in the UK think about being more outspoken about this.
I don’t like subtweeting people I consider online friends, but there is a subset of people who are very worried about the ongoing radicalisation of our political elite but won’t ever acknowledge the echoes with the radicalisation of their colleagues on trans rights
And few who are sympathetic to us, some who are friendly with me on here, will ever stick their head above the parapet
November 25, 2025 at 12:49 PM
Reposted by Rob Mullins
Can anyone recommend any good autobiographies or edited collections featuring trans+ life writing?
November 23, 2025 at 10:10 AM
Reposted by Rob Mullins
despite everyone sort of knowing fed soc was affirmative action for asshole beliefs, there was still a lot of prestige attached to it. there was negative prestige attached to, say, critical legal studies.
November 22, 2025 at 6:59 PM
I still can't quite believe they're going for this. They got a court to endorse the idea that the drafters of the GRA 2004 didn't understand their own drafting, and brought the idea of "biological sex" back from the dead. And they're using it to police toilets.
the ehrc leaked the draft guidance

answers "what if a business doesn't have space to create gender neutral toilets?"

then trans people just can't use the toilet there

www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/...
November 20, 2025 at 12:36 PM
I am still very confused by the argument that EHRC make against trans-inclusive services under Schedule 3 of the Act, but I've deleted my initial post because I don't want to mislead people. Jess makes a great contribution in reply.
Suppose a service is run on perception. A trans woman is denied entry on the basis that she is visibly trans. She sues for direct *sex* discrimination. On the EHRC reading she would succeed if she could show that any other "biological men" had used the service.
November 20, 2025 at 5:50 AM
Reposted by Rob Mullins
So. Have had a look at the long title and empowering provision for making regulations under the Medicines Act 1981 in re the puberty blockers decision with a view to judicial review prospects. & it's pretty hard to scope prospects for success at this stage, tbh. Short thread as to why & next steps.
November 19, 2025 at 7:35 PM
Reposted by Rob Mullins
"Israeli soldiers . described a free-for-all in Gaza and a breakdown in norms and legal constraints, with civilians killed at the whim of individual officers"

“If you want to shoot without restraint, you can,” [says] Daniel, the commander of an [IDF] tank unit"
November 10, 2025 at 12:28 PM
I'm on my fourth or fifth listen of Double Infinity and I'm getting ready to fill out my apology form for sleeping on Big Thief yet again.
November 18, 2025 at 11:54 PM
"Trans-exclusionary and “gender critical” takes are extremely prevalent in the British media. I therefore wrote with the assumption that many readers might not realise that such views are seen as fringe and extreme by the vast majority of feminists outside the UK (and by many within the UK too)."
This piece was greenlit and then killed by a British newspaper, so I’ve decided to publish myself instead.

Trans People Deserve Better.
"Gender critical" feminism doesn't help women but it does help the far right

open.substack.com/pub/wellread...
Trans People Deserve Better
"Gender critical" feminism doesn't help women but it does help the far right
open.substack.com
November 17, 2025 at 11:06 AM
I'm very grateful to Ashley for this detailed summary of the hearing in GLP v EHRC. Largely for my own edification, I'm going to try to summarise the basic issues raised in plain English. I'm going to try to be as neutral as possible.🧵
1/🧵 Day 2 of 2. Today at 10:30am, High Court in London, Court 1, before Mr Justice Swift, R (Good Law Project, on the application of) v Equality and Human Rights Commission, a rolled-up hearing for judicial review of EHRC’s “interim update”.

No live reporting, sorry.
1/🧵 Today at 10:30am, High Court in London, Court 1, before Mr Justice Swift, R (Good Law Project, on the application of) v Equality and Human Rights Commission, a rolled-up hearing for judicial review of EHRC’s “interim update” (Day 1 of 2)

No live reporting, sorry.
November 16, 2025 at 12:26 PM
Reposted by Rob Mullins
34 years ago today
Bikini Kill – Kathleen Hanna and Kathi Wilcox – performed at St. Stephen’s in Washington, D.C., on November 16, 1991.

Photos: Brad Sigal

#punk #punks #punkrock #womenofpunk #bikinikill #kathleenhanna #kathiwilcox #history #punkrockhistory #otd
November 16, 2025 at 3:55 AM
Reposted by Rob Mullins
the motorcycle guy larry summers' situationship was two-timing him with in 2017:
November 13, 2025 at 11:48 PM
There is already a reply up on LinkedIn to Melanie Field saying that the Equality Act does confer protection on groups. But that's not her point, as I understand it. Her point is that the discrimination protections (and their exceptions) operate from the perspective of an individual claimant.
A really thorough analysis from Melanie Field. She helped draft the Equality Act so perhaps the SC should have consulted her before rewriting the law on a whim.
A careful, and compelling analysis, of how the Equality Act operates post the awful Supreme Court decision, from the woman who guided the Act through Parliament. www.linkedin.com/pulse/does-e...
November 14, 2025 at 4:05 AM
This article is the UK's current cultural moment in microcosm. I was mostly nodding along until I ran into the most jaw-droppingly transphobic passages I have read in a long time.
The WHAT? "The fashion for transgenderism – led not by journalists but by entertainers, dramatists and to a now forgotten extent by politicians of all the main parties"
The Prescott memo flunks the impartiality test | The Observer
observer.co.uk
November 13, 2025 at 12:17 PM
Reposted by Rob Mullins
These are some quite heartbreaking stories and, as Holly Greenberry-Pullen comments in the piece, really illustrates the perverse absurdity of deeming trans teens to young to even get blockers but being fine with intersex kids getting horrifically drastic full-on bodily surgery as *toddlers*.
‘I don’t want anyone to suffer like I did’: the intersex campaigners fighting to limit surgery on children
What should be done about the small proportion of babies born with genitals that are neither typically male nor typically female? Many of those affected believe parents and doctors are often too quick...
www.theguardian.com
November 12, 2025 at 6:17 AM
Reposted by Rob Mullins
Standing by the PM when he hid in a cupboard over a summer of far-right rallies, but turning on him to sabotage a sorely-needed course correction in the government’s economic policies
November 11, 2025 at 9:50 PM
This is the real scandal. It's happening in real time, with the collaboration of the British establishment. You don't even have to be particularly attentive to see it.
I've been reading about this from an Australian perspective, and it seems very clear that a group of UK journalists, none of them with any apparent medical expertise, have collaborated with a medical old guard to press a false consensus against youth gender medicine.
Emily Maitlis admitting she worked at the bbc to try and get healthcare for trans people shut down
November 10, 2025 at 10:59 PM
I've been reading about this from an Australian perspective, and it seems very clear that a group of UK journalists, none of them with any apparent medical expertise, have collaborated with a medical old guard to press a false consensus against youth gender medicine.
Emily Maitlis admitting she worked at the bbc to try and get healthcare for trans people shut down
November 10, 2025 at 10:52 PM
Reposted by Rob Mullins
Reviewed Sam Tanenhaus's William F. Buckley bio. insidestory.org.au/the-entertai...
The entertaining insurgent • Dominic Kelly
Conservative activist William F. Buckley cajoled America along the road to the Reagan revolution
insidestory.org.au
November 10, 2025 at 5:20 AM
Reposted by Rob Mullins
Ecuador was the first nation to recognise the rights of nature in its constitution in 2008.

If you've been inspired by Ecuador, please sign this open letter below.

url.au.m.mimecastprotect.com/s/xv3lCYWLOx...
Letter of Support: Life Must Come First in Ecuador and Around the World
Life Must Come First in Ecuador and Around the World Ecuador's current constitution is one of the most advanced in the world: it includes rights of nature, the right to water, and collective rights for indigenous peoples who protect valuable ecosystems. This constitution also guarantees various types of consultations that allow citizens to have a say on economic activities with a high environmental impact, such as oil and mining. Ecuadorian President Daniel Noboa, who strongly supports opening up oil extraction and mining in Ecuador, is promoting constitutional change. His government has called a referendum for November 16th so that citizens can decide whether they want to dissolve the existing constitution and have a new one drafted. As researchers, scientists, academics, artists, environmental advocates, and supporters of Indigenous peoples, we express our support for environmental defenders in Ecuador and encourage Ecuadorian citizens to maintain Ecuador's current Constitution and vote No on the call for a constituent assembly. We respect the Ecuadorian people's right to self-determination and their right to decide on their constitution. As people and organisations who have been inspired by the Ecuadorian constitution, we look to the Ecuadorian people to continue to lead the world with the same foresight they displayed in 2008. However, like many people, both in Ecuador and around the world, we are also deeply concerned about the ecological vulnerability that the new constitution could generate by weakening ecosystem protections and prioritizing extractivist economic interests. Right now, the Amazon, the Galapagos Islands, highly biodiverse Andean forests, and other invaluable ecosystems are at grave risk. Ecuador became the first country in the world to recognize rights of nature in its constitution in 2008. Since then, it has served as a beacon of hope and a model for communities worldwide seeking to protect the ecosystems that sustain life. Ecuador's pioneering constitutional framework has inspired hundreds of movements across dozens of countries—from Indigenous communities in North America to municipalities in Europe, from grassroots organizations in Asia to regional governments in Latin America—to pursue similar legal protections in their own jurisdictions. This global movement recognizes what Ecuador enshrined in law: that nature has inherent rights independent of human utility, and that protecting these rights is essential for present and future generations. Ecuador's constitutional innovations have demonstrated that it is possible to build legal systems that place ecological integrity and community rights at the center of governance. The constitution makes clear what the climate and ecological crises on the planet are also making clear: that nature’s rights are everyone’s rights, intertwining humans’ very being with that of the rivers, mountains, and forests. The potential weakening of these protections would represent not only a loss for Ecuadorian people, but a setback for people everywhere seeking to protect their communities in the face of climate change and biodiversity loss. And it represents a huge loss for nature. Last September, Ecuadorian citizens launched a new wave of protests to defend their communities from the ecological, health, and social damages that come with increased extractivism. Ecuador's government has responded with alarming violence. Since protests began in September 2025, reports document more than 282 people injured, 172 detained, 15 temporarily disappeared, and at least three killed in the context of the government's crackdown on environmental and Indigenous protectors. The Ecuadorian government has also begun freezing the bank accounts of more than 60 Indigenous and environmental defenders and organizations, without laying charges or providing legal justification. Activist groups, including Amazon Frontlines and coalitions of Ecuadorian environmental organizations, see these actions as deliberate attempts to silence resistance and enable extractive expansion. These developments reflect a severe and well-documented escalation of repression directed at Ecuadorian citizens defending Ecuador's ecosystems and Indigenous territories from extractive expansion, and they have drawn widespread international attention and condemnation. We join major international organizations and over 120 groups in condemning this repression, in particular the use of militarized policing, force against peaceful protests, and arbitrary financial punishment. We call on Ecuador's government to stop these human rights abuses. Ecuador is one of the countries with the highest biodiversity per square kilometer in the world. Ecuador’s vibrant, diverse ecosystems provide essential benefits to all humanity: they regulate climate, purify water and air, maintain fertile soils, pollinate crops, provide medicines, and support the food systems upon which billions depend. The Amazon rainforest alone generates rainfall that sustains agriculture across South America, stores vast amounts of carbon that helps stabilize global climate, and harbors species that may hold cures for diseases we have yet to understand. The Galapagos Islands serve as a living laboratory for understanding evolution and adaptation in an era of rapid environmental change. These ecosystems are irreplaceable—once destroyed, they cannot be reconstructed, and their loss diminishes the prospects for human wellbeing and survival everywhere. These ecosystems are Life. Life must come first. Signatures:
url.au.m.mimecastprotect.com
November 9, 2025 at 2:21 AM