Madeleine Moore
@matheleine.bsky.social
310 followers 320 following 2K posts
Adopted Yorkshirewoman. Applied mathematician. Cricket fan. Appalling Dota player. Vote Green. (She/her) https://www.matheleine.com/ Views my own.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
matheleine.bsky.social
I am just an ordinary person, but if you are reading this as a trans/enby young person and just need someone to talk to, I am there too. You are not alone.
genderedintelligence.co.uk
Today, we honour the unstoppable power and passion of trans youth.

To every trans and non-binary young person:
- You are not alone
- You are strong
- We stand with you

Find out more about our online and in-person youth groups: genderedintelligence.co.uk/services

#InternationalYouthDay
To every trans and non-binary young person:  

You are not alone.   

You are strong.  

We stand with you.  

#InternationalYouthDay
matheleine.bsky.social
I love this 🏳️‍⚧️
Reposted by Madeleine Moore
lgbtiqagreens.bsky.social
In the spirit of #AbolishBadThings
🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️💚
Dark Green background, Zack, Mothin and Rachel in the foreground, with Zack pointing to "Support Trans Rights" posted under the Green Party Logo.
Reposted by Madeleine Moore
goodlawproject.bsky.social
We’re supporting @nionwomen.bsky.social, a collective of women refusing to let their identity be weaponised to justify discrimination against trans people.

They’re calling on women everywhere to join them:
https://goodlaw.social/xmgc
goodlaw.social
matheleine.bsky.social
Presumably this is their thinly-veiled plan to disrupt their inevitable ECtHR loss.
matheleine.bsky.social
I feel like an election campaign featuring Badenoch, Streeting and Farage as options might lead to the heat death of the universe.
matheleine.bsky.social
Absolutely, couldn't agree more.
matheleine.bsky.social
Anecdotally, I would suggest the same. We had a workshop on violence/abuse and LGBTQ+ communities at work the other week, and all the attendees essentially said they the last thing they'd consider doing in a situation is talk to the police.
matheleine.bsky.social
No change for the Lib Dems? Someone needs to get Ed Davey on a waterslide, stat.
matheleine.bsky.social
Four years to go, no need to aim so low!

(Sorry, giddy from the current Green surge...)
matheleine.bsky.social
💚
zackpolanski.bsky.social
Not only are we at record numbers of members and growing every day - this is our highest ever poll rating.

We're just getting started.

This is the politics of the 99% Vs the 1% for a country we can all afford to live in - plenty of room to grow.

Join.greenparty.org.uk
electionmaps.uk
Westminster Voting Intention:

RFM: 32% (-3)
LAB: 17% (-2)
CON: 17% (+3)
GRN: 15% (+4)
LDM: 12% (=)
SNP: 3% (=)

Via @findoutnow.bsky.social, 8 Oct.
Changes w/ 1 Oct.
Reposted by Madeleine Moore
zackpolanski.bsky.social
Latest poll puts Greens just two points behind Labour. When I said we weren't here to be disappointed in Labour but to replace them, I meant it.

Join us and let's make hope normal again.

join.greenparty.org.uk
Poll from find out now showing greens on 15 and labour and Tories on 17. Reform on 32.
matheleine.bsky.social
Aye. I don't know enough to say if that's sufficient or not. They did hear from the Scottish Government and from Amnesty, so that may well be enough. But not my forte, I just rant about things on social media🤷‍♀️
matheleine.bsky.social
The McCloud one. I am not a legal expert at all, but I think it might be difficult to get the ECtHR to rule the SC didn't give a fair trial. I hope I am wrong.
matheleine.bsky.social
I am not sure that the case being taken on Article 6 is even the successful one that compels the Government to act, I think it's more likely to be another one.

But either way, by then we may not even be in the ECHR.
matheleine.bsky.social
Yep. You don't even have to work hard to see how the SC judgment leaves the UK in a 'neither one sex nor the other' position exactly the same as when it lost last time with Goodwin. But we need some case to make its way through all the lower courts to get to Strasbourg in, what 5-7 years time?
matheleine.bsky.social
The prison rules are really indefensible under any human rights scrutiny. Sadly, that is lacking in our modern judicial system.
matheleine.bsky.social
There's no real justification for keeping a record of GRC holders / gender history. The niche laws that originally were meant to be excluded from the GRA (like some hereditary rules stuff) really should have been canned decades ago. Now that list is basically a ticking timebomb for trans people.
matheleine.bsky.social
*you’re

Oh for an edit function.
matheleine.bsky.social
Aye, it's a horrid position to be in. Having a GRC basically means that nobody knows your trans right now, so whatever the EHRC does, you can largely carry on. But, that could drastically change in the future. It's somewhat scary.
matheleine.bsky.social
Realistically, that can't happen without us leaving the ECHR and with GDPR changes, but if they can't get Labour to do it, Reform/Tories will happily oblige in their quest to destroy the country.
matheleine.bsky.social
They need to do something, at any rate. My guess is they will push everything into getting sex assigned at birth into Digital ID, so that when that slowly becomes mandatory for more things, it basically becomes very difficult to be trans.
matheleine.bsky.social
It's where buying your way through the top ranks of politics and the media hits the reality that on the ground, most people are not GC and are not keen on GC fascism.
matheleine.bsky.social
I am purely speculating, but I think they are worried because even with the resurgence of the social conservative wing of the Party, I think there's opposition to the EHRC guidance. They are also extremely worried about the fact that TUC is also against the guidance.
matheleine.bsky.social
It's probably because it's only really a few key frontline figures they have indoctrinated. They want to try to nix the bulk ambivalence or support.
Reposted by Madeleine Moore
florarenz.bsky.social
Peter Dunne, Emily Grabham and I have edited a special section of feminists@law on the Supreme Court decision in For Women Scotland. You can find our editorial about this below. The special section has some brilliant critical and feminist takes on the decision journals.kent.ac.uk/index.php/fe...
How can critical and feminist scholars respond to the decision in 'For Women Scotland'? | feminists@law
journals.kent.ac.uk