Works at Living Streets.
Free free 🍉
🔗 sam.wakeling.me
For me it is making them welcoming public spaces for everyone to enjoy and move in without fear from traffic (including the remaining vehicles which are there).
I drew this of my local South Road, Sheffield.
The only people more likely than not to understand where their income places them in the UK distribution are those with incomes in the lowest fifth.
The only people more likely than not to understand where their income places them in the UK distribution are those with incomes in the lowest fifth.
The only people more likely than not to understand where their income places them in the UK distribution are those with incomes in the lowest fifth.
The only people more likely than not to understand where their income places them in the UK distribution are those with incomes in the lowest fifth.
This from 1927.
This from 1927.
What if they’re right?
How to reduce road danger as fast as we can? So many things we could do, with trivial tech we have now:
Speed limiters
Lower speed limits
Remove cut-through traffic (LTNs)
Retrofit safer road design.
Faster, cheaper and simpler than promised AVs
What if they’re right?
How to reduce road danger as fast as we can? So many things we could do, with trivial tech we have now:
Speed limiters
Lower speed limits
Remove cut-through traffic (LTNs)
Retrofit safer road design.
Faster, cheaper and simpler than promised AVs
Next, apply it to all fuel types, multiply it on vehicle weight, and increase it to levels relevant to the harms caused by driving and the reductions in driving needed for liveable communities and planet.
And scale it by income to make the rich pay the most.
Next, apply it to all fuel types, multiply it on vehicle weight, and increase it to levels relevant to the harms caused by driving and the reductions in driving needed for liveable communities and planet.
And scale it by income to make the rich pay the most.
Recouped by the profits the aviation industry makes by being massively subsidised with tax-free fuel etc?
Recouped by the profits the aviation industry makes by being massively subsidised with tax-free fuel etc?
I’m guessing that wasn’t deliberate though.
They deleted the line in which I describe Donald Trump as “the most openly corrupt president in American history.” /1
I’m guessing that wasn’t deliberate though.
If Govt was bothered abt rich ppl benefitting from Govt tax breaks for things rich people use for leisure, they'd tax aviation fuel, when air travel is disproportionately used by richest (by LONG way).
We are calling for the scheme to be reformed rather than capped.
Read our full statement. wheelsforwellbeing.org.uk/wheels-for-w...
If Govt was bothered abt rich ppl benefitting from Govt tax breaks for things rich people use for leisure, they'd tax aviation fuel, when air travel is disproportionately used by richest (by LONG way).
www.linkedin.com/posts/the-co...
Norway's gift to the UK this year comes with strings attached - they are pressuring the UK to sign off on the mega-polluting Rosebank oil field.
#StopRosebank
17 cars
31 pedestrians
17 cars
31 pedestrians
assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/691edd...
assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/691edd...
Shoutout to all my fellow champs, chiefs, and kings. ✊
Shoutout to all my fellow champs, chiefs, and kings. ✊
1/n
A new paper from great colleagues takes a careful look at techno-optimism — the belief that technology will largely solve climate change — and what it means for real-world climate action.
(1/4)👇
osf.io/preprints/ps...
1/n
4/n