Thundal Archsys
@thundalarchsys.bsky.social
260 followers 110 following 2.3K posts
He/Him | Enby (Fluid) 🏳️‍⚧️ | Poly/RA | Omni | ND | 36yo My spaces are 18+ assumed, safe spaces. Worldbuilding, gaming lineage/BTS/context, transhumanist with particular interest in morphological freedom.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
Welcome, traveler!

Your host is an aspiring author, with passions for GSRM activism (specializing in Poly and GNC advocacy), gaming, and philosophy.

My intention for the account is to discuss my book more casually, as well as commentary on current events; I'll have a secondary once I re-pub.
Sharing lock screens?

I've had this one for years, and it's back in style, baby!
To wrap back to your original question, then: The people on the right who "championed" free speech and states rights only doing so because they wanted to stymie federal powers that sought to eliminate racism, and sought to drag them down afterwards?

I want more people to see that reality.
Voting against Trump and voting for Kamala are different things, even if both of them check the same box, so to say.
As far as coalition governance, absolutely! My different-reason-same-function folk? All about it. But, alternatively, voting for someone to represent me who doesn't think I'm human or my existence isn't real, just because he's admittedly better than his opponent?
Most of my partners and metamours have similar core values as I do. Those further from my orbit have at least the broad strokes.

Why would I not want the same kinds of attitudes in the people who speak for me in legislative matters?

Functional granularity, sure, but in the ideal?
And within *that*, it would also show that there's political opportunism in adopting that position, either by him or by a challenger-from-left to him. Which should be the point in safe protest votes, too.
A decent purity test seeks to divide bad actors from ignorant folk willing to learn and change. Building out a group who genuinely cares about each other works wonders!

On a larger scale, it exists to push for solidarity. Like pushing Newsom to the left on Trans Rights.
Smaller scale, but when my partners match with potential partners, one of the things I suggest is looking at his gaming history. A dude who bought e.g. Hogwarts should probably be asked about it. Judge by reaction, for safety.

He's not likely to share values/be safe/be queer|trans friendly.
Games supporting both, but only wanting to do one or the other at one time were, indeed, a special kind of nightmare.

My biggest takeaway from it is that setting up a default input scheme for a controller, as a developer, must be either a triumph of ego or a very special kind of hell.
Playing PSO and having a single button swap for every weapon I was using? Hot. All my techs available on a controller? Yes, please. Having a "city mode" so that I stop accidentally making the wrong dialog choices with my dumb hands? Fantastic.

Spending the hours *doing* that was a nightmare.
I really, really enjoyed it. The setup for each game was a nightmare, but once working it was a dream. Most games don't use key chords, but I could set that up myself. Having dozens of face-button commands was so good for my hands.

But only for specific titles: older games *need* a dpad.
Reposted by Thundal Archsys
Reposted by Thundal Archsys
Was looking up stuff on traditional Christian flesh-mortification clothing, and the bdsm people appear to be the only ones keeping the torch alive? I find this strangely moving.
Reposted by Thundal Archsys
ABYSM - Prologue

- Episode now on Webtoon -

Let's begin.

www.webtoons.com/en/canvas/ab...
Yeah; that's a *lot* of fucking money for (comparatively) easy targets.
Cheers!

I definitely haven't fully woken up yet, and here I am trying to be helpful XD
People who are tired, who don't like driving and have to, people on long empty highways, etc.

Because one driver can cause more injuries/deaths the more people are on the road, the sheer volume plays into it heavily, I'd think.
I think a lot of that is how much more driving is required day-to-day in the states.

Just a quick glance, but the average-mile-per-car-per-day is around 19 for the UK, and 37 for the US. Add to that the who and why of driving, and the stats make sense...
I just hate that the glut of oversized vehicles stems from a legal requirement to make cars more fuel efficient.

Like, yeah, fuck the oversized cars, but fuck the why of them even more...
I mean, a lot of things are *only* available for streaming; you can't actually buy and own them. I think that's what they're on about.
Annihilating insurance companies would save people more than it would cost them in taxes; I think cali is big enough to actually do that alone, unlike most states.
Just finished Voice of Cards: The Isle Dragon Roars.

It was a fun little ride. Evokes classic jRPGs without heavy nostalgia for them. Had a couple moments that actually got a laugh out of me.

It gets a sale recommendation from me, probably 10, maybe $15, but it's a solid, tight B-list game.
They're trying to have a fascist civil war.

I feel like they're expecting stochastic terrorism to do more than it is, which is a saving grace. The 2a people they expected to jump at the chance are like "ehhh... Seems like work..."
Were I just a little more cynical I'd wonder if he has a humiliation or masochistic kink, or if he really just wants out of politics...

(No shame on the kink thing, except for the taking-us-down-with-him bit)