http://www.tuomaspernu.london
My worry is that the @royalsociety.org makes the scientific community look like a bunch of pathetic pushovers!
Are you for science or against it? It's as simple as that.
www.theguardian.com/science/2025...
Stay free
Stay free
On aika herätä. Makkaratehtailun aika on ohi.
On aika herätä. Makkaratehtailun aika on ohi.
"This is where critical thinking comes in."
The whole problem is that the use of LLMs erodes critical thinking. One might be able to forge somewhat useful research interactions with LLMs for a while. But the (near) future is bleak.
www.kcl.ac.uk/rethinking-r...
"This is where critical thinking comes in."
The whole problem is that the use of LLMs erodes critical thinking. One might be able to forge somewhat useful research interactions with LLMs for a while. But the (near) future is bleak.
Writing a paper has never been easier.
Clogging the scientific publishing pipeline has never been easier.
It took me 54 seconds to write up an experiment I did not actually conduct.
prism.openai.com
Writing a paper has never been easier.
Clogging the scientific publishing pipeline has never been easier.
It took me 54 seconds to write up an experiment I did not actually conduct.
prism.openai.com
Should happen at the EU level. And the universities should lead the way - the US companies are a serious threat to European science. There's no time to waste. @uniuef.bsky.social
bsky.app/profile/ones...
Should happen at the EU level. And the universities should lead the way - the US companies are a serious threat to European science. There's no time to waste. @uniuef.bsky.social
bsky.app/profile/ones...
Wikipedia turns 25 years! I am who I am also thanks to it!
wikipedia25.org/en/which-wik...
Which #Wikipedia future are you? I got "Consensus-Driven Collaborator"
#wikipedia25
Wikipedia turns 25 years! I am who I am also thanks to it!
wikipedia25.org/en/which-wik...
Which #Wikipedia future are you? I got "Consensus-Driven Collaborator"
#wikipedia25
"AI tools seem to automate established fields rather than explore new ones, highlighting a tension between personal advancement and collective scientific progress."
Employing AI is like peeing in one's pants: great idea at first, but soon everybody's regretting it.
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
"AI tools seem to automate established fields rather than explore new ones, highlighting a tension between personal advancement and collective scientific progress."
Employing AI is like peeing in one's pants: great idea at first, but soon everybody's regretting it.
Two new calls have just been launched under the Horizon Europe Work Programme, mobilising €307.3M to strengthen Europe’s digital innovation & competitiveness.
www.politico.eu/article/elon...
www.politico.eu/article/elon...
open.substack.com/pub/hegemon/...
open.substack.com/pub/hegemon/...
✍️ @curtrice.bsky.social
#ResearchIntegrity #Retractions #AcademicSky
✍️ @curtrice.bsky.social
#ResearchIntegrity #Retractions #AcademicSky
OK. But also:
“We elect people for scientific achievement or delivery. And therefore my view is that we get rid of them if that turns out to be false or not correct".
Musk has delivered an attack on science -> boot him!
OK. But also:
“We elect people for scientific achievement or delivery. And therefore my view is that we get rid of them if that turns out to be false or not correct".
Musk has delivered an attack on science -> boot him!
I get that @royalsociety.org is cool with this. What I don't get is that they are cool with his attacks on science. Boot him!
I get that @royalsociety.org is cool with this. What I don't get is that they are cool with his attacks on science. Boot him!
My worry is that the @royalsociety.org makes the scientific community look like a bunch of pathetic pushovers!
Are you for science or against it? It's as simple as that.
www.theguardian.com/science/2025...
By contracts, we found 11.2 million research posts in all of 2025 on there.
In other words, 0.000006% of Twitter appears to be sharing research. Basically zero.
By contracts, we found 11.2 million research posts in all of 2025 on there.
In other words, 0.000006% of Twitter appears to be sharing research. Basically zero.