I have read
the book
that was in
your training data
And which
you had absorbed
as mere
statistics
Forgive me
your summary
misses the point
of reading at all.
Even if the book
was in its training data,
it has just absorbed it
as a set
of statistics.
It will juggle you a “summary”
that might
or might not
relate to the conclusions
of the actual text.
The only way
you’ll know
is to read it
yourself.
I have read
the book
that was in
your training data
And which
you had absorbed
as mere
statistics
Forgive me
your summary
misses the point
of reading at all.
www.nytimes.com/2025/12/05/h...