Dan Paskins
@danpaskins.bsky.social
1.3K followers 1.4K following 52 posts
Save the Children UK Exec Director - UK Impact Vice-Chair, End Child Poverty Chair, Civic Power Fund
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Dan Paskins
Reposted by Dan Paskins
se13ed.bsky.social
Now in Yr 3 they all do exactly the same stuff British primary school children have always done - practicing the recorder, cutting up crepe paper with scissors, learning about the Egyptians for some reason, going on school trips to see the Cutty Sark. They're all becoming little Londoners. (3/end)
Reposted by Dan Paskins
se13ed.bsky.social
It's a great school! The need to support those children with limited English comes at zero cost to the education of others in the same class and, in fact, it works to their benefit because it gives all the kids exposure to children from different backgrounds. (2/)
Reposted by Dan Paskins
se13ed.bsky.social
OK so my younger son's primary has I think the highest rate of children with English as a second language in the borough (and one of the highest in the country). Biggest primary in the borough too (650 kids). There are quite a lot of kids who start reception with v little spoken English. (1/)
sundersays.bsky.social
Katie Lam says there are some schools in London "where 3/4 pupils don't speak English to the standard needed to for education"

Are there? London school results are outperforming everywhere else, partly + migration/diversity effects

[CPS livestreaming this if want to check the quote.It was 915am]
Reposted by Dan Paskins
se13ed.bsky.social
Policymaking - developing and agreeing policies, and then implementing them - is difficult, but plenty of people (increasingly) confuse it with "coming up with ideas for policies" which is, indeed, very easy. Same philosophy that says that announcing the thing is the same as doing the thing
t0nyyates.bsky.social
Someone who thinks 'policymaking is generally not very complicated' either does not know what they are talking about or has very strong ideological leanings that help disappear the trade-offs that worry the rest of us.
wrathofgodbot.bsky.social
Good thing he has a high quality team of thoughtful people with a firm grasp of the issues and how complex governing is
Reposted by Dan Paskins
bigissue.com
Gloria Odhi, a participant of Changing Realities, shared her story with the Scottish first minister with the hope of inspiring change.
I couldn't afford to fix my broken bed. People in poverty like me need help with the essentials
www.bigissue.com
Reposted by Dan Paskins
sundersays.bsky.social
As Yom Kippur ends, it is terrible that a holy day has seen people killed at a place of worship in Manchester

I hope many of us will express solidarity + support for Jews in Britain, and work with them + those of every faith and none to deepen our efforts to tackle antisemitism, hatred + extremism
To everyone in Britain's Jewish Community: you are not alone.

We will not let hate or those who spread it win.

We stand with you
danpaskins.bsky.social
Really important from @resfoundation.bsky.social

I have spent more hours of my life then I care to remember looking at different compromise options for the 2 child limit.

The clear conclusion is scrap it in full, no ifs, not buts and no half measures.
resfoundation.bsky.social
Is there room for compromise on the two-child limit?

Entirely scrapping it would have the biggest impact on child poverty and be most cost-effective.
The two-child limit means that an
additional 500,000 children are
currently growing up in poverty. If current policies remained in place,
we would expect one-in-three British
children to be growing up in poverty
by the end of the decade immediate abolition would cost £3.5 billion
per year and lift half a million children out
of poverty by the end of the decade. How do less ambitious options measure up? Other rumoured options would be less cost effective and other options would risk creating new cliff edges.
Reposted by Dan Paskins
resfoundation.bsky.social
Is there room for compromise on the two-child limit?

Entirely scrapping it would have the biggest impact on child poverty and be most cost-effective.
The two-child limit means that an
additional 500,000 children are
currently growing up in poverty. If current policies remained in place,
we would expect one-in-three British
children to be growing up in poverty
by the end of the decade immediate abolition would cost £3.5 billion
per year and lift half a million children out
of poverty by the end of the decade. How do less ambitious options measure up? Other rumoured options would be less cost effective and other options would risk creating new cliff edges.
Reposted by Dan Paskins
gabrielmilland.bsky.social
If you have a Jewish friend, neighbour, colleague then send them a text rather than saying something on social media.
Reposted by Dan Paskins
jntod.bsky.social
On National Poetry Day, the greatest poem I have ever read
A printed poem which reads:

I hav for breakfast Weetabix

I hav for lunch some meat

I have for tea 2 sosajis and thats enuf to eat

Peter Hazel, 5
Reposted by Dan Paskins
alexclegg.bsky.social
Very encouraging to read that the Government is preparing to lift the two-child limit as part of its child poverty strategy, but it is disheartening that options short of scrapping it entirely are still being considered. Thread on why this would be the wrong choice for an ambitious strategy:
Rachel Reeves to lift two-child benefit cap in November budget
Exclusive: Officials exploring options to change rule that affected 1.7 million children in Great Britain last year
www.theguardian.com
Reposted by Dan Paskins
Reposted by Dan Paskins
cpaguk.bsky.social
The Prime Minister’s confirmation that government is on a journey to end child poverty is welcome and this can only mean that the Budget scraps the two-child limit and benefit cap. Children and families have waited patiently and now it’s time for government to deliver.
Reposted by Dan Paskins
stephenkb.bsky.social
I go on about two-child, but it is the ur-example. Labour were always going to have to do it, the decision to defer and delay it has just ended up being expensive in both internal political costs and also they have actually just wasted money on things that do not really move the dial.
stephenkb.bsky.social
Part of the 'no strategy, only tactics' problem this government has is: once you have made a manifesto commitment to bringing down child poverty, indeed, once you are *the Labour party*, you were going to have to do the thing that actually reduces it. Much has been wasted thru dallying for a year.
resfoundation.bsky.social
Amid reports that MPs and an advisory taskforce will recommend scrapping the two-child limit on benefits, it's worth noting that this step would be the most targeted and cost-effective way for the Government to meet its aim of reducing child poverty ⤵️
Reposted by Dan Paskins
savechildrenuk.bsky.social
The UK Government has got the opportunity to do this at the upcoming Autumn Budget - they must take it.

Tell your MP to act now to reduce child poverty.

3/3
Save the Children UK
action.savethechildren.org.uk
Reposted by Dan Paskins
savechildrenuk.bsky.social
As they arrive at the Labour Party Conference, we're greeting Keir Starmer and his MPs with a message that demands a screen bigger than 21,000 mobile phones*:

"What was the point of winning the general election if not to lift kids out of poverty?"

1/3
Reposted by Dan Paskins
helenbarnard.bsky.social
Future Jobs Fund impact: 2 years after the programme, participants were 11 ppts more likely to be in unsubsidised work. 7 ppts less likely to be on benefits.

An 'unqualified success'

Cost £1 billion.

Useful @NIESRorg blog: niesr.ac.uk/blog/future-...
Reposted by Dan Paskins
torshi.bsky.social
When we make a big donation we're always like "we give unrestricted or not at all" and it's wild how surprised people are. Like if you don't trust them to make good decisions why are you giving them money at all
Reposted by Dan Paskins
johncarlbaker.bsky.social
Want to co-sign this as someone who works in philanthropy. Conservative donors and foundations have been willing to invest huge sums for general support, correctly assuming that it would produce long-term gains. The liberal approach to philanthropy has been pretty much the exact opposite.
Reposted by Dan Paskins
helenbarnard.bsky.social
Great from Meg Hillier on why it's urgent, right & realistic to lift two child limit:
“In a country where life chances vary so starkly, lifting the two-child cap is the quickest, smartest and most effective to enable every child to fulfil their potential... 1/2
www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/...
Lucy Powell calls for scrapping of two-child benefit cap
The deputy Labour leadership contender urges the chancellor to remove the restriction as Sir Keir Starmer faces a budget dilemma
www.thetimes.com