Iridescent Ibex
@iridescent-ibex.bsky.social
"Even Skinny Birds Can Shine"
we are not "way past" something that might not even happen in our distant future
NOT impeached… we are WAY PAST THAT
Trump and His DOJ Goons Must Be Impeached Over the Epstein Files
open.substack.com/pub/olgalaut...
open.substack.com/pub/olgalaut...
December 26, 2025 at 6:18 AM
we are not "way past" something that might not even happen in our distant future
They did put up with this nonsense, and the most powerful Dem on the planet at the time said repeatedly "he's not worth impeaching" as she blocked impeachment efforts by the dozen.
I’m pissed at idiots who spend their time dragging Dems and lying about Dems while MAGA is running roughshod because the MAGA congress won’t do anything to stop him! A Dem Congress would not be putting up with this nonsense…Dems already impeached him TWICE…they did their jobs…VOTERS didn’t!
December 26, 2025 at 6:11 AM
They did put up with this nonsense, and the most powerful Dem on the planet at the time said repeatedly "he's not worth impeaching" as she blocked impeachment efforts by the dozen.
They are not short of time :-D
He’s waiting for 67 Senators that will convict because anything less than that is a waste of time!!! They already impeached him TWICE just so voters could put MAGA back in office..🙄
December 26, 2025 at 5:50 AM
They are not short of time :-D
Reposted by Iridescent Ibex
Are you guys getting it? There isn’t some magic formula that makes a president impeachable, no specific bar that must be reached. If the House and Senate want him out, he’s gone.
Why do I keep hammering on this? Because I want to make clear that 🤡 isn‘t the problem. Congress is the problem.
Why do I keep hammering on this? Because I want to make clear that 🤡 isn‘t the problem. Congress is the problem.
Does anyone know the exact text of the impeachment article that got Andrew Johnson impeached?
Here it is:
"Resolved, That Andrew Johnson, President of the United States, be impeached of high crimes and misdemeanors."
That's it.
Here it is:
"Resolved, That Andrew Johnson, President of the United States, be impeached of high crimes and misdemeanors."
That's it.
December 26, 2025 at 5:31 AM
Are you guys getting it? There isn’t some magic formula that makes a president impeachable, no specific bar that must be reached. If the House and Senate want him out, he’s gone.
Why do I keep hammering on this? Because I want to make clear that 🤡 isn‘t the problem. Congress is the problem.
Why do I keep hammering on this? Because I want to make clear that 🤡 isn‘t the problem. Congress is the problem.
Wow.
a sternly worded tweet.
color me impressed.
a sternly worded tweet.
color me impressed.
A Christmas Eve news dump of ‘a million more files’ only proves what we already know: Trump is engaged in a massive coverup.
The question Americans deserve answered is simple: WHAT are they hiding—and WHY?
Justice delayed is justice denied. Release the files. Follow the law.
The question Americans deserve answered is simple: WHAT are they hiding—and WHY?
Justice delayed is justice denied. Release the files. Follow the law.
December 26, 2025 at 5:33 AM
Wow.
a sternly worded tweet.
color me impressed.
a sternly worded tweet.
color me impressed.
any of the 150+ impeachments that Pelosi blocked could have saved us from the fascist takeover
#ImpeachConvictRemove
#ImpeachConvictRemove
Plus he was impeached twice and the Senate never convicted and removed him. The second one could have saved us from this disastrous second term, but, Republicans decided that was fine.
December 26, 2025 at 5:27 AM
any of the 150+ impeachments that Pelosi blocked could have saved us from the fascist takeover
#ImpeachConvictRemove
#ImpeachConvictRemove
Reposted by Iridescent Ibex
Anyone who feels this way should join the robust impeachment movement that’s been around since January. No need to wait for a backlash when you can help the people creating one
I want to *stress* that the backlash to this administration needs to be overwhelming, sustained, and come bearing legal consequences.
Joe Rogan and Shane Gillis on Nick Fuentes running for president one day.
Rogan: “He could probably win in a few years. Listen, he couldn’t have existed before, right? Ten, twenty years ago, couldn’t have existed. Now, super popular. What’s twenty years from now look like?”
Rogan: “He could probably win in a few years. Listen, he couldn’t have existed before, right? Ten, twenty years ago, couldn’t have existed. Now, super popular. What’s twenty years from now look like?”
December 26, 2025 at 3:26 AM
Anyone who feels this way should join the robust impeachment movement that’s been around since January. No need to wait for a backlash when you can help the people creating one
Reposted by Iridescent Ibex
I just realized that if he DOES die while in office, not only will we be stuck with Vance for the rest of his term, but the media coverage of his funeral will be a disgusting over the top beatification of him and the whitewashing of his actual life & reign of terror will be vomit-inducing.
December 26, 2025 at 2:30 AM
I just realized that if he DOES die while in office, not only will we be stuck with Vance for the rest of his term, but the media coverage of his funeral will be a disgusting over the top beatification of him and the whitewashing of his actual life & reign of terror will be vomit-inducing.
Can we really be surprised Pelosi lost when she punted on first down hundreds of times?
Democrats have agency too, and they consistently decide to protect a deranged orange fascist.
Democrats have agency too, and they consistently decide to protect a deranged orange fascist.
Huh. I wonder why that is? It’s typical and obvious but under immutable Bluesky logic — Republicans don’t have agency, even when Democrats actually do the thing you pretend you want. You simply post something insanely stupid and think you have a point. Republicans acquitted him. Ignorant or stupid?
December 26, 2025 at 5:11 AM
Can we really be surprised Pelosi lost when she punted on first down hundreds of times?
Democrats have agency too, and they consistently decide to protect a deranged orange fascist.
Democrats have agency too, and they consistently decide to protect a deranged orange fascist.
Reposted by Iridescent Ibex
So are any Republicans going to do something after the inevitable land strikes in Venezuela?
Hell, are the Democrats gonna do something or just cave during the next shutdown? @crow.house.gov
#Impeach #Politics #Democrats
Hell, are the Democrats gonna do something or just cave during the next shutdown? @crow.house.gov
#Impeach #Politics #Democrats
December 26, 2025 at 4:17 AM
So are any Republicans going to do something after the inevitable land strikes in Venezuela?
Hell, are the Democrats gonna do something or just cave during the next shutdown? @crow.house.gov
#Impeach #Politics #Democrats
Hell, are the Democrats gonna do something or just cave during the next shutdown? @crow.house.gov
#Impeach #Politics #Democrats
Reposted by Iridescent Ibex
People understand that perfectly well. These people work for us and they should do what we want them to do and what the constitution requires them to do.
If they can't do that, why should we care what they have to say about anything? Government depends on the consent of the governed.
If they can't do that, why should we care what they have to say about anything? Government depends on the consent of the governed.
December 26, 2025 at 4:30 AM
People understand that perfectly well. These people work for us and they should do what we want them to do and what the constitution requires them to do.
If they can't do that, why should we care what they have to say about anything? Government depends on the consent of the governed.
If they can't do that, why should we care what they have to say about anything? Government depends on the consent of the governed.
Reposted by Iridescent Ibex
Does anyone know the exact text of the impeachment article that got Andrew Johnson impeached?
Here it is:
"Resolved, That Andrew Johnson, President of the United States, be impeached of high crimes and misdemeanors."
That's it.
Here it is:
"Resolved, That Andrew Johnson, President of the United States, be impeached of high crimes and misdemeanors."
That's it.
December 26, 2025 at 3:51 AM
Does anyone know the exact text of the impeachment article that got Andrew Johnson impeached?
Here it is:
"Resolved, That Andrew Johnson, President of the United States, be impeached of high crimes and misdemeanors."
That's it.
Here it is:
"Resolved, That Andrew Johnson, President of the United States, be impeached of high crimes and misdemeanors."
That's it.
Can't take him down without impeachment
but The Bulwark thinks impeachment is a bad idea
for smart people you guys have some massive dissonance going on here
but The Bulwark thinks impeachment is a bad idea
for smart people you guys have some massive dissonance going on here
"This should take him down."
On TNL, @sarahlongwell25.bsky.social , @jvl.bsky.social and @timmiller.bsky.social talk just how bad the Epstein files are for Trump
On TNL, @sarahlongwell25.bsky.social , @jvl.bsky.social and @timmiller.bsky.social talk just how bad the Epstein files are for Trump
December 25, 2025 at 8:16 AM
Can't take him down without impeachment
but The Bulwark thinks impeachment is a bad idea
for smart people you guys have some massive dissonance going on here
but The Bulwark thinks impeachment is a bad idea
for smart people you guys have some massive dissonance going on here
This is "Jewish Space Lasers" level insanity.
He might as well claim Bill Clinton was always faithful to his wife.
Dear, @morningjoe-msnow.bsky.social , Charles Manson was not a good guy :-D
He might as well claim Bill Clinton was always faithful to his wife.
Dear, @morningjoe-msnow.bsky.social , Charles Manson was not a good guy :-D
Scarborough: "Trump is not on Epstein's list. There's nothing in there really damning about Trump or Bill Clinton. So one of the great mysteries is not what Trump's hiding, it's why if he's not in the files - which all the reporting says he's not - why is he so obsessed on blocking access to them?"
December 25, 2025 at 8:13 AM
This is "Jewish Space Lasers" level insanity.
He might as well claim Bill Clinton was always faithful to his wife.
Dear, @morningjoe-msnow.bsky.social , Charles Manson was not a good guy :-D
He might as well claim Bill Clinton was always faithful to his wife.
Dear, @morningjoe-msnow.bsky.social , Charles Manson was not a good guy :-D
Klobuchar is a Do-Nothing Democrat.
They do nothing.
and they're terrified of even saying the word impeachment
They do nothing.
and they're terrified of even saying the word impeachment
This is a grotesque abuse of power. If you ever wondered if there are any limits to what Trump will do for his ballroom funders/platform pals, this answers it for you: there are none.
U.S. Bars 5 European Tech Regulators and Researchers
www.nytimes.com/2025/12/23/t...
U.S. Bars 5 European Tech Regulators and Researchers
www.nytimes.com/2025/12/23/t...
U.S. Bars 5 European Tech Regulators and Researchers
www.nytimes.com
December 25, 2025 at 8:04 AM
Klobuchar is a Do-Nothing Democrat.
They do nothing.
and they're terrified of even saying the word impeachment
They do nothing.
and they're terrified of even saying the word impeachment
The Constitution says straight out that traitors shall be impeached
Impeaching is stupid. These people are TRAITORS.
December 25, 2025 at 8:03 AM
The Constitution says straight out that traitors shall be impeached
Who is leading the opposition?
nobody
Who is maximizing pressure on the Cons to do their Constitutional Duty?
nobody
nobody
Who is maximizing pressure on the Cons to do their Constitutional Duty?
nobody
I don't think you know what impeachment is. I think, if you ever took a middle-school level US Government class, you flunked it.
December 25, 2025 at 8:01 AM
Who is leading the opposition?
nobody
Who is maximizing pressure on the Cons to do their Constitutional Duty?
nobody
nobody
Who is maximizing pressure on the Cons to do their Constitutional Duty?
nobody
Mud-slinging works
Not impeaching is quiet exoneration
Not impeaching is quiet exoneration
I am just not convinced that failed impeachment attempts help us.
The Republicans are allowed to vaguely gesture at "where there's smoke there's fire" after creating the smoke in front of everybody because people like them and want them to win.
Democrats just look weak and wrong when they fail.
The Republicans are allowed to vaguely gesture at "where there's smoke there's fire" after creating the smoke in front of everybody because people like them and want them to win.
Democrats just look weak and wrong when they fail.
December 25, 2025 at 8:00 AM
Mud-slinging works
Not impeaching is quiet exoneration
Not impeaching is quiet exoneration
Reposted by Iridescent Ibex
He'll just replace Bondi with another criminal
We have to impeach and remove the capo
We have to impeach and remove the capo
December 24, 2025 at 7:14 AM
He'll just replace Bondi with another criminal
We have to impeach and remove the capo
We have to impeach and remove the capo
if being impeached means nothing why does the entire world know the name Monica Lewinsky ?
Being impeached means nothing. If it did, half of the country wouldn't have been able to gleefully vote for the pedo rapist two more times.
December 25, 2025 at 7:44 AM
if being impeached means nothing why does the entire world know the name Monica Lewinsky ?
They should be leading the fight right now
It matters that they're doing nothing to oppose the regime
It matters that they're doing nothing to oppose the regime
I think we can shout at the Democrats for not instantly impeaching everybody after the midterms when they might actually have the votes.
December 25, 2025 at 7:38 AM
They should be leading the fight right now
It matters that they're doing nothing to oppose the regime
It matters that they're doing nothing to oppose the regime
This was just too funny to ignore :-D
December 25, 2025 at 7:37 AM
This was just too funny to ignore :-D
You can be Anti-Impeachment
or
You can be Anti-Fascist
You can't be both
or
You can be Anti-Fascist
You can't be both
December 25, 2025 at 7:21 AM
You can be Anti-Impeachment
or
You can be Anti-Fascist
You can't be both
or
You can be Anti-Fascist
You can't be both
Reposted by Iridescent Ibex
Trump and multiple administration officials have committed thousands of crimes and impeachable acts in Trump's present and prior terms.
Congress has a duty to impeach.
Congress has a duty to impeach.
December 24, 2025 at 12:35 PM
Trump and multiple administration officials have committed thousands of crimes and impeachable acts in Trump's present and prior terms.
Congress has a duty to impeach.
Congress has a duty to impeach.
these ridiculous dorks will bend over backwards to avoid impeaching criminals
Democrats threaten lawsuit as DOJ says it will miss Epstein files deadline www.axios.com/2025/12/19/j...
Democrats "exploring all legal options" as DOJ says it will miss Epstein files deadline
"The Department of Justice is now making clear it intends to defy Congress itself," said Reps. Raskin and Garcia.
www.axios.com
December 24, 2025 at 6:35 PM
these ridiculous dorks will bend over backwards to avoid impeaching criminals