SEEN In Justice
banner
seen-in-justice.bsky.social
SEEN In Justice
@seen-in-justice.bsky.social
Because justice must be SEEN to be done...
Reposted by SEEN In Justice
Fuck the Department of Education.
Expect us.

xoxo BASH BACK
February 18, 2026 at 4:01 PM
Reposted by SEEN In Justice
With 'feminism' like The Times' who needs misogyny?
Hit piece by Geraldine Scott in the newspaper that celebrates the rapist Donald Trump as a "feminist champion" and supported the ending of the right to abortion. For so long as they're lying about us, I'll know we're doing the right thing.
February 18, 2026 at 11:12 AM
Reposted by SEEN In Justice
If you own every possible channel for information you can do whatever you like in terms of shaping perceptions of Folk Demands.

The shocking thing is despite all this, there's not a hugely unanimous hostility to trans people after years of intensive exposure to hate.
These people never grapple with the reality that the right not only outspends trans people 20:1 but they also control social media algorithms and many legacy media institutions.

They never ask the questions why public opinion changed and why certain issues are so central to the debate.
February 18, 2026 at 2:11 PM
Reposted by SEEN In Justice
The only way UK trans and non-binary people can maintain autonomy and dignity without risking falling victim to a vindictive transphobe at work, is by getting an accessible toilet key.

Free if you need them to be:
www.essehouse.co.uk/pee-in-peace-program
February 18, 2026 at 9:54 AM
Reposted by SEEN In Justice
It's not a permanent solution. It's merely temporary breathing space to avoid drama; for those that haven't got enough in the tank to fight every day, or who feel the anxiety is overwhelming.

Free if you need them to be:
www.essehouse.co.uk/pee-in-peace-program
February 18, 2026 at 10:32 AM
Reposted by SEEN In Justice
Short of having "women don't have penises" tattooed across her forehead Bridget Phillipson could hardly be clearer about who she is choosing to stand with.

And it's the men's rights movement in drag that is transhate. archive.ph/Ul7g3
February 18, 2026 at 11:41 AM
Reposted by SEEN In Justice
Baroness Falkner took up her tenure as Chair in December 2020, and they’ve stated that they haven’t had a single meeting with any trans-led organisations in the five years prior to the date of your request. Which would be January 2021.

That is not a coincidence.
February 17, 2026 at 10:54 PM
Reposted by SEEN In Justice
FOI reveals the EHRC holds zero minutes of meetings with trans-led organisations in the past 5 years.

This is the UK’s 'equality' regulator.

Trans voices are not important enough for the EHRC to keep a record of what was said. This should be a headline in all the papers.
February 17, 2026 at 9:56 PM
Reposted by SEEN In Justice
Reposted by SEEN In Justice
The list of organisations continues to grow larger.

When a community deems a term offensive, this constitutes a slur.

We are calling on all organisations to sign our open letter. Please get in touch via DM or our website.

Individuals can also sign via this link:
tacc.org.uk/biological-s...

1/2
February 17, 2026 at 12:54 PM
Reposted by SEEN In Justice
REMINDER: The best ways to contact us are below!
Due to recent crackdowns, our previous emails are no longer functional.
We now have a contact form available at tinyurl.com/ContactBASHBACK

And as usual you can join us over at tinyurl.com/JoinBASHBACK

xoxo
February 16, 2026 at 12:39 PM
Reposted by SEEN In Justice
This is just thing that should be released with names.
February 17, 2026 at 9:18 PM
Reposted by SEEN In Justice
The anti-trans side made bomb threats to children's hospitals. They spent a billion dollars messaging this over the last 7 years while the Dems mostly stayed silent or ducked away. But somehow, they always seem to blame trans people for their own persecution.

archive.ph/E2pfS
February 17, 2026 at 4:40 PM
Reposted by SEEN In Justice
The world's richest man bought Twitter, banned the word cis, started paying the worst anti-trans accounts directly, and removed protections from harassment for trans folks to push them off the site. He's using his companies to push anti-trans litigation and spent millions on anti-trans ads.
February 17, 2026 at 4:51 PM
Reposted by SEEN In Justice
No amount of "debate" can win when the deck is stacked like that by the wealthy and powerful. And that's just one billionaire. JK Rowling has spent millions to fund lawfare and anti-trans orgs in the UK. Joseph Edelman has spent millions bankrolling Do No Harm to push anti-trans policies.
February 17, 2026 at 4:51 PM
Reposted by SEEN In Justice
Next Monday!
Learn more about the Political Disconnect - the gap between what politics is meant to do, and how everyday people experience it. Join me and Dr. James Jones of the Sheila Y. Oliver Center for Politics and Race in America for a webinar on Monday, Feb 23, at 3p Eastern.
bit.ly/PoliticalDisconnect
February 17, 2026 at 8:14 PM
Reposted by SEEN In Justice
At some point, you start believing that trans people are evil because you don't want to accept that the society that you still participate in could so easily kill an innocent group of people. You rationalize for your own sanity.
February 17, 2026 at 11:30 PM
Reposted by SEEN In Justice
What are you talking about?

Why would a pervert go to the trouble of wearing a dress? Surely he would just walk in looking like a man and say "i was born female and transitioned to male" and nobody can ask him to leave.

You guys made it easier for perverts with your nonsense.
February 14, 2026 at 1:21 PM
Reposted by SEEN In Justice
We should probably call it what is is: Unjustifiable pandering to those with deep prejudice, with no public benefit & multiple negative effects felt by entirely innocent citizens, many of whom are being systematically being removed from access to a meaningful life as part of a cohesive society.
Today's ruling on the EHRC's interim guidance is a disappointing, confusing and mixed picture.

A trans woman who is a customer in a café can use the women's toilets, but if she works there she might not be able to.

Once again everyday life is being made a legal labyrinth for trans people.
The High Court has ruled on our challenge to the EHRC’s interim guidance.

The judgment contains some good news for trans rights – but plenty of bad.

Read our analysis
goodlawproject.org/update/high-...
February 13, 2026 at 2:20 PM
Reposted by SEEN In Justice
Terfs all yell that it is unfair and unreasonable when I say this, but they *never* have an articulated reason why it is unfair or unreasonable.

They just have prejudice, and all the reasons they give to justify their pejudice are elaborate obfuscation of the truth.
If you are uncomfortable because of your imagination, and not a tangible offence, then it is *you* who should remove yourself to a 3rd space because your imagination is leading you to inflict discomfort, but *with intent* and that intent is based in something that isnt real.

3/3

3/3
February 16, 2026 at 2:52 PM
Reposted by SEEN In Justice
Just in: 50 parents and transgender activists have blockaded the HHS Building in protest of sweeping new rules that could ban trans youth nationwide.

24 were then arrested.

This is the kind of action we need.

Subscribe to support our journalism.
24 Parents And Activists Blockade HHS Headquarters In Protest Against New Trans Youth Care Ban, Arrested
The protestors blocked entrance to the Department of Health and Human Services headquarters to protest a rule that could eliminate trans youth care nationwide.
www.erininthemorning.com
February 17, 2026 at 7:34 PM
Reposted by SEEN In Justice
It's exhausting being right all the time. Genuinely.
February 17, 2026 at 11:14 PM
Reposted by SEEN In Justice
"Jo Maugham KC, executive director of the Good Law Project, accused her of 'pitching for the votes of misogynists, homophobes, racists and antisemites, who are the only people who benefit from removing discrimination protections'."
Reform accused of ‘pitching for votes of misogynists’ with plan to scrap Equality Act
Charities have warned that scrapping the Equality Act would be a ‘significant step backwards’ for discrimination protections in Britain
www.independent.co.uk
February 18, 2026 at 6:22 AM
Reposted by SEEN In Justice
Cambridge University paid for my private diagnosis because waiting lists were so long and it was impacting my studies. It was rigorous, I had to bring in my childhood school reports. I had way more symptoms than needed for diagnosis. Now, despite this, I can't get medication because of shared care.
February 17, 2026 at 8:58 AM
Reposted by SEEN In Justice
The barrister Setu Kamal sued @danneidle.bsky.social for £8m for defamation. Representing himself in court, Kamal cited three cases that made Neidle’s case “untenable”.

But, in a bizarre twist, it turned out that these cases were hallucinated by ChatGPT:
https://goodlaw.social/n1cv
Fake law: Barrister suing Dan Neidle relied on cases from ChatGPT
Demand for £8m supported by fake legal cases generated with AI tools – but that’s not the worst part of this shocking lawsuit
goodlaw.social
February 17, 2026 at 12:54 PM