“Much better second half from Ødegaard”
“Much better second half from Ødegaard”
After reading the first paragraph I can't help but wonder if the whole fanbase collectively thought this in silence... Because I did.
After reading the first paragraph I can't help but wonder if the whole fanbase collectively thought this in silence... Because I did.
+7 Tottenham (45)
+6 Man City (77)
+5 Arsenal (79)
+1 Liverpool (85)
-1 Chelsea (68)
-4 Man Utd (38)
-5 Newcastle (61)
-8 Aston Villa (58)
+7 Tottenham (45)
+6 Man City (77)
+5 Arsenal (79)
+1 Liverpool (85)
-1 Chelsea (68)
-4 Man Utd (38)
-5 Newcastle (61)
-8 Aston Villa (58)
and yet I am unconvinced. can’t put my finger on why. too much squad churn maybe; can’t see the breakthrough yet.
and yet I am unconvinced. can’t put my finger on why. too much squad churn maybe; can’t see the breakthrough yet.
The kumbaya days of 22/23 are long gone.
The kumbaya days of 22/23 are long gone.
828 Wenger - Arsenal
810 Ferguson - Man Utd (only PL)
427 Moyes - Everton (first spell)
342 Guardiola - Man City
334 Klopp - Liverpool
278 Kinnear - Wimbledon (only PL)
1/2
828 Wenger - Arsenal
810 Ferguson - Man Utd (only PL)
427 Moyes - Everton (first spell)
342 Guardiola - Man City
334 Klopp - Liverpool
278 Kinnear - Wimbledon (only PL)
1/2
www.nytimes.com/athletic/648...
www.nytimes.com/athletic/648...
—Cheap good GK
—Cheap veteran DM
—Young rotational defender
—Martinelli in
—Eze in for Trossard
—Shooty, fast, ready transition winger
—ST
Is exactly how I would have drawn it up, and frankly more than I expected.
—Cheap good GK
—Cheap veteran DM
—Young rotational defender
—Martinelli in
—Eze in for Trossard
—Shooty, fast, ready transition winger
—ST
Is exactly how I would have drawn it up, and frankly more than I expected.