Scholar

Bill Hare

H-index: 36
Environmental science 31%
Economics 28%

Reposted by: Bill Hare

climateanalytics.org
REPORT: If Asian economies were to carry out their plans to deploy risky and expensive carbon capture & storage (CCS) to address fossil fuel emissions, they could add an extra 25 billion tonnes of emissions to the atmosphere by 2050. Their economies would suffer.
climateanalytics.org/publications...
The global climate risks of Asia’s expansive carbon capture and…
This report looks at the climate and economic implications of Asia’s promotion of carbon capture and storage (CCS) to reduce fossil fuel emissions.
climateanalytics.org
climateactiontracker.org
#China's new #climate target is unlikely to drive down emissions: the country will already achieve it under its current policies.
It's a net target that includes land use & forestry; an absolute target wld be more transparent
It's a shift from emissions & energy intensity to absolute emissions
billhare.bsky.social
Indeed, it was never really going to work and in my view was always meant to be a means of distracting the political class doing the right thing.

Here is a potted history

reneweconomy.com.au/the-great-ca...
reneweconomy.com.au

Reposted by: Bill Hare, Mark Lubell

climateanalytics.org
Wonderful turnout for our #ClimateWeekNYC event last night featuring a keynote by Dr Piers Forster on the latest climate science and a panel discussion on how the ICJ opinion can shape politics and how to align global action with 1.5°C.

Missed the event? Watch the recording:
New York Climate Week 2025: Holding the line: 1.5°C, overshoot, and the urgency of now
YouTube video by Climate Analytics
www.youtube.com

Reposted by: Bill Hare

allouryesterdays.bsky.social
Australia and its dismal, criminal, history of climate targets (1988-2025)

In which Groundhog Day happens again and again, but somehow it’s just not funny or enlightening.

1/7
allouryesterdays.info/2025/09/20/a...
David Pope cartoon "You are now leaving the Holocene"
rbreich.bsky.social
Jimmy Kimmel was suspended by ABC after pressure from the United States government. This is a direct attack on the First Amendment.

Everyone who values freedom of speech should be outraged — and they should speak out.

Reposted by: Bill Hare

ketanjoshi.co
In 2015, Labor chose a 45% by 2030 target, which was the lower end of the climate change authority's recommendation. In 2021, they weakened that to 43%, and the core line with that was "it's a floor, not a ceiling" (that's what all targets are????????????)

ketanjoshi.co/2023/05/30/m...
Remember 2015? PM Tony Abbott ate an onion. The Force Awakens was released. And a guy named Bill Shorten set a net zero target for the year 2050, along with an emissions reduction target of 45% by 2030. That was at the lower end of 40-60%, recommended by the remnants of the independent government climate advisors, the ‘Climate Change Authority’ (CCA).

Fast forward to December 2021, nearly six years later. Opposition leader Anthony Albanese prepares to announce an updated 2030 target. Since 2015, Australia has been ravaged by bushfires, a major IPCC report has been released, and renewable energy has grown cheaper, fast. Here it comes, the fans murmured. The moment we’ve all been waiting for. Labor insisted in their defence – constantly – that 43% is a “floor, not a ceiling”. I still find this brain-meltingly absurd. The entire point of a target is that it’s a minimum goal, not a maximum limit, or a range. It was offered like it was some extra special promise, when it just described the dictionary definition of target. It spoke to the weird corners they had to go to defend the indefensible.

Plenty of effort has gone into trying to present their weak settings as very brave. In an interesting but problematically forgiving review of the Albanese government’s first year, former Labor staffer Sean Kelly writes that:

"Albanese has a long list [of significant actions], but in particular points to the government’s actions on climate and clean energy, including the way they have changed Australia’s place in the world"
Courtesy of Carbon Brief’s Simon Evans, this chart nicely illustrates that Albanese’s commitment puts Australia behind the UK, Germany, the EU, the US (their target strengthened since this chart was made), Japan, Canada and South Korea. On the target alone, Australia remains a laggard, and that’s before we get to everything else.

by Andrew WatkinsReposted by: Bill Hare

windjunky.bsky.social
This is powerful commentary and clear logic from @richarddenniss.bsky.social
strangerous.bsky.social
Dr Richard Denniss says the “obvious” ones to pay for damage from increased floods as per the latest climate report should be the Fossil Fuel co’s, as houses will become uninsurable
“The insurance industry will not help ppl in 20yrs time with their flooded houses”💯 #Estimates

Reposted by: Bill Hare

meckeringboy.bsky.social
“Vanuatu's climate change minister criticised expected approval of the North-West Shelf gas project as "internationally wrongful" & legally contentious, as Australia's climate record comes under close scrutiny at Pacific Islands Forum.”

www.sbs.com.au/news/article...

🔥Also morally reprehensible.
'Wrongful act': Vanuatu warns Australia may break international law if gas project goes ahead
A senior Pacific minister has warned Australia's energy transition is no longer defensible, following a landmark legal ruling.
www.sbs.com.au

Reposted by: Bill Hare

climateanalytics.org
As the Australian government decides its new #climate targets, we've modelled 1.5°C compatible targets for both 2030 and 2035 that are credible and achievable, especially for a country wanting to host the COP31 climate talks next year.
#auspol2025 #auspol
🧵
bit.ly/CA_Aus2035
A blueprint for climate leadership: 1.5-aligned targets for Australia
This report answers the question: what would science-based, 1.5˚C-compatible 2030 and 2035 targets, and a net zero roadmap, look like for Australia?
bit.ly
climatedad.bsky.social
The last 3 years have been the hottest in around 125,000 years.

CO2 levels are their highest in MILLIONS of years.

But most people have no idea this is happening, let alone what it means for our kids’ futures.

Our politics & media have failed our children. We should be furious.

Reposted by: Bill Hare

pollyjhemming.bsky.social
It's really quite impressive how strenuously everyone in this article avoids talking about fossil fuels. Nearly a fifth of Australia’s emissions now come from digging up and sending fossil fuels overseas. #auspol @australiainstitute.org.au
australiainstitute.org.au/post/nearly-...
pollyjhemming.bsky.social
From the Labor adviser who pitched “net zero fossil fuels” comes a sequel: “Don’t set climate targets too high, or the government might have to do something".
#auspol #climate
www.afr.com/policy/energ...
Screenshot of afr article
Labor policy adviser says to lower expectations on climate targets
Ryan Cropp
Ryan CroppEnergy and climate reporter
Aug 27, 2025 – 4.32pm

Save

Share





Gift this article



Listen to this article
5 min
A key Labor climate adviser has warned the government against setting its 2035 emissions target too high, arguing that any goal north of 60 per cent will require a major expansion of emissions reductions in the transport, industrial and agricultural sectors.

Frank Jotzo, the author of a forthcoming Labor-commissioned report into a potential carbon border tax, said excessively ambitious policies being proposed by some climate groups would be impractical and easily undermined by opponents of change.

Reposted by: Bill Hare

climateanalytics.org
How do you assess climate loss and damage that defies monetary valuation - like the loss of cultural heritage?

Our new @iki-germany.bsky.social project in the Pacific led by
SPREP combines modelling and domestic knowledge to try and answer these difficult questions and plan for the future.
A new approach for rethinking climate-related loss and damage in the Pacific
The IKI-project “Building Our Loss and Damage Response” (BOLD) is developing innovative ways of recognising and responding to both economic and non-economic climate impacts. 
www.international-climate-initiative.com

Reposted by: Bill Hare

climateanalytics.org
The #ICJ opinion calls for ambitious climate plans. The third round of Nationally Determined Contributions are due this year. The #AdvisoryOpinion is a powerful reminder that countries must put forth ambitious, 1.5°C-aligned NDCs.
Image displaying quote from the International Court of Justice Advisory Opinion on national climate targets: "Each Party’s successive nationally determined contribution [NDCs] will represent a progression beyond the Party’s then current nationally determined contribution and reflect its 
highest possible ambition."
billhare.bsky.social
Australia is one of the world’s top fossil fuel producers and exporters and is pushing more fossil fuel development.

The ICJ advisory opinion on climate change should cause politician and decision makers to stop new fossil fuel developments immediately.

reneweconomy.com.au/australia-on...
Australia on notice as top UN court finds governments can be sued for failing to act on climate change
Governments that fail to phase out oil, gas and coal to prevent climate harms could be ordered to pay reparations under international law, the World Court has found.
reneweconomy.com.au

References

Fields & subjects

Updated 1m