banner
LightNews
partpartisan.bsky.social
Partisan
@partpartisan.bsky.social
670 followers 520 following 3.7K posts
Whatever the opposite of an enlightened centrist is. Citizen of the Greatest Nation in This or Any Age (Washington State). Counter-Zionist. 🌐🔰🏗🌃🚋⛈️🌲✡️📈🗣
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
partpartisan.bsky.social
Partisan @partpartisan.bsky.social · Oct 17
Hey. Nice to see ya.

I'm Partisan. I'm an Econ//Linguistics student in the PNW.

Foreign Policy|Developmental Econ|Urbanism|Politics|D&D (4E)|Magic (CEDH)|40k (Ynnari)|Stormlight|日本語ok(ちょっと)|And likely some other stuff.

🌐🔰🏗🌃🚋⛈️🌲
2 18
Reposted by Partisan
segyges.bsky.social
SE Gyges @segyges.bsky.social · 3h
controversial opinion: we should give every federal justice a book deal and an extremely cushy opportunity to promote their book on every TV show. we should stagger them so that each of them gets a month to themselves
atrupar.com
Aaron Rupar @atrupar.com · 15h
Amy Coney Barrett defends heavy use of the shadow docket: "If we wrote a long opinion, it might give the impression that we have finally resolved the issue, and in none of these cases have we finally resolved the issue."
3 1 42
Reposted by Partisan
vituperativeerb.bsky.social
Vituperative Erb @vituperativeerb.bsky.social · 5h
No no, it’s not antisemitism, it’s just that these rootless cosmopolitan Jews lack an authentic connection between blood and soil and are thus an alien people no matter how many generations they live in a place
tunaghost.bsky.social
Johnny Staccato: Television’s Jazz Detective @tunaghost.bsky.social · 8h
you’re right, colorism means this red-haired European is from the middle east
1 1 13
partpartisan.bsky.social
Partisan @partpartisan.bsky.social · 6h
Every person in this photo believes that Elon Musk's PR trip to Israel means he definitionally "can't be antisemitic."

But they're happy to call their fellow Jews "jihadists" for daring to listen to a pro-yeshiva politician just because he said Bibi is a criminal (the median Israeli opinion).
noahshachtman.bsky.social
Noah Shachtman @noahshachtman.bsky.social · 13h
Zohran is speaking at my synagogue. These folks are outside.
protesters
3
Reposted by Partisan
joelhs.bsky.social
Joel S. @joelhs.bsky.social · 7h
These are people who are protesting against a synagogue, and yet have somehow convinced themselves the other side are the antisemites.
noahshachtman.bsky.social
Noah Shachtman @noahshachtman.bsky.social · 13h
Zohran is speaking at my synagogue. These folks are outside.
protesters
4 10 55
partpartisan.bsky.social
Partisan @partpartisan.bsky.social · 6h
Many a Dvar Torah recalls this as "Jews denouncing Jews."

And yet there are many in our nation who are eager to denounce each other and declare their neighbors, kin, and kids "self-hating Jews" or "un-Jews" over not showing sufficient loyalty to a secular state on the other side of the world.
partpartisan.bsky.social
Partisan @partpartisan.bsky.social · 6h
The Talmud (yoma 9b) records that the destruction of the Second Temple was divine punishment for the "baseless hatred" expressed by Jews who "ate and drink with each other, but stabbed each other with verbal barbs."
1
partpartisan.bsky.social
Partisan @partpartisan.bsky.social · 13h
"You coulda changed the gun into steam" is an objectively correct indictment of Dr. Manhattan. It is ~also~ something that Blake is only saying to try and deflect blame away from himself.

bsky.app/profile/part...
partpartisan.bsky.social
Partisan @partpartisan.bsky.social · 13h
Like, here's the whole book, folks!
3
partpartisan.bsky.social
Partisan @partpartisan.bsky.social · 13h
Dr. Manhattan is a failure. But it's also not *totally his fault* that he's a failure; because NO ONE could ever be in his position and NOT be an abject failure.

But at the same time, Watchmen is about the narratives people craft for themselves; the ~excuses~ they make for their bad behavior.
1 1 5
partpartisan.bsky.social
Partisan @partpartisan.bsky.social · 13h
To me — as much as I think Moore is a crank — I also think Moore's politics are ~deeply important~ to understanding Watchmen's (really great) themes.

Moore's an anarchist. The story is fundamentally about how power should NEVER be concentrated into the hands of individuals.
1 3
partpartisan.bsky.social
Partisan @partpartisan.bsky.social · 13h
Like, here's the whole book, folks!
4
partpartisan.bsky.social
Partisan @partpartisan.bsky.social · 13h
The thing that irks me is how all Watchmen discourse is:

"Well, I think {Rorschach, Ozymandius} is based!"

"Noooo!!!! {Rorschach, Ozymandius} is evil!!!!"

When it's actually transparently obvious that the story is primarily about how much of a spineless coward Dr. Manhattan is.
segyges.bsky.social
SE Gyges @segyges.bsky.social · 13h
upset that i cannot post "Adrian Veidt did nothing wrong" as bait now because Peter fucking Thiel beat me to it
2 8
Reposted by Partisan
segyges.bsky.social
SE Gyges @segyges.bsky.social · 13h
what kind of Alan Moore fan are you
5 7 65
partpartisan.bsky.social
Partisan @partpartisan.bsky.social · 14h
Anyway, we should probably nuke dating apps. People are still waiting for the Uber of dating (which they *assume* was Tinder. But actually, what they need is an app that will organize and throw catillions for them).
1 1
partpartisan.bsky.social
Partisan @partpartisan.bsky.social · 14h
(For men, these are the users who maximize their match-quantity. For women, these are users who are discerning, as an adaptation against the former hyper-efficient male users)
1 1
partpartisan.bsky.social
Partisan @partpartisan.bsky.social · 14h
And when I say match inequality here, I'm not talking about inequality between the genders, but inter-gender match inequality, as matches are concentrated into the hands of the most "efficient" users.
1 2
partpartisan.bsky.social
Partisan @partpartisan.bsky.social · 14h
As in any market defined by asymmetrical market power between price-setters and takers, there becomes extreme "wealth" (match) inequality, and certain "firm" strategies dominate others (like: men swiping right on literally every person to minimize the odds of passing over a potential match).
1 3
partpartisan.bsky.social
Partisan @partpartisan.bsky.social · 14h
But, the institutional knowledge (not to mention just like, the literal institutional reality of corporations in the women's fashion space) developed under patriarchy means that now women have become price-setters in the dating market.
1 2
partpartisan.bsky.social
Partisan @partpartisan.bsky.social · 14h
Notice that the only institutional knowledge about fashion which men have is all about suits — which is rooted not in the historical goal to impress women, but in the goal of gaining employment and wielding economic status over *other men*.
1 2
partpartisan.bsky.social
Partisan @partpartisan.bsky.social · 14h
But, because of this coasting they got to do, now, "men" as an institution lack basically *any* knowledge on how to make themselves attractive to women.
1 2
partpartisan.bsky.social
Partisan @partpartisan.bsky.social · 14h
But now, when it comes to dating, men have writ-large lost basically all of the structural power that let them be price-setters in the dating market. Meaning they no longer get to coast off of "I'm a man with a job, so of course women will compete for me."
1 2
partpartisan.bsky.social
Partisan @partpartisan.bsky.social · 14h
But, under those patriarchal conditions, women developed institutional knowledge about how to compete in the market for suitors (this analysis views fashion and makeup as an economic 'technology').
1 2
partpartisan.bsky.social
Partisan @partpartisan.bsky.social · 14h
My pet historical economics theory about The Apps and the modern dating market writ-large is that women were historically forced to compete as price-takers in the dating market due to their institutional lack of power under patriarchy.
1 2
partpartisan.bsky.social
Partisan @partpartisan.bsky.social · 14h
Dating apps represent maybe the greatest case study in market failure we have available to us.

And what's even funnier is that, in spite of the fact that the biggest losers of the apps seem to be dudes, the problem still seems to be ultimately attributable to patriarchy more directly than any other
sashotodorov.bsky.social
Sasho Todorov @sashotodorov.bsky.social · 14h
A lot of this is just the natural end result of the "optimal" app strategies for men and women combining into an extremely maladaptive process where no one gets what they want.
youngvulgarian.marieleconte.com
Marie Le Conte @youngvulgarian.marieleconte.com · 22h
this is sociopathic behaviour and I think we need to treat it as such! just because something has become easy to do doesn't mean it has become less creepy, or more acceptable!
2 8
Reposted by Partisan
sashotodorov.bsky.social
Sasho Todorov @sashotodorov.bsky.social · 14h
A lot of this is just the natural end result of the "optimal" app strategies for men and women combining into an extremely maladaptive process where no one gets what they want.
youngvulgarian.marieleconte.com
Marie Le Conte @youngvulgarian.marieleconte.com · 22h
this is sociopathic behaviour and I think we need to treat it as such! just because something has become easy to do doesn't mean it has become less creepy, or more acceptable!
1 8 95
Reposted by Partisan
dabenner.bsky.social
Il Pomodoro @dabenner.bsky.social · 15h
The subtext in this piece is how Facebook made boomers insane. The villain here has at earlier times in his life been thoughtful and competent, even as I don't agree with any of his views, and he's thoroughly incentivized to act like a maniac.

www.nytimes.com/2025/10/12/u...
She Despised Charlie Kirk. He Resolved to Make People Like Her Pay.
www.nytimes.com
5 36 150