Joel
@polyparadigm.bsky.social
2.3K followers 1.4K following 13K posts
Materials scientist:some range and depth, interested in making arcane topics a little more accessible. Prior place photo was from the aughts; figured I should update.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
polyparadigm.bsky.social
I am noticing that even some fairly scholarly people on here don’t seem to really distinguish between “socially constructed” and “fake”

It feels important to the project of fascism that we conflate these two ideas

Most social constructs have a fake counterpart they’re constructed in opposition to
Reposted by Joel
trance.bsky.social
EPSTEIN FILES

I suggest to you, that most of you have it wrong.

It's not Trump being in the files that's so problematic. It's that it's largely his leverage against a lot of rich/powerful people.

A British working royal was there for fuck's sake. Bill Gates got divorced over this.
Reposted by Joel
4nikkolas.bsky.social
after millions of views and shares of my Portland Frog art. (thank you all🙏🏾) I got requests to highlight priests, and chickens, and Chicagoans, and T-Rexes, and more… all of us who refuse to bend the knee. so this is for US.
𝚂𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚕.
𝚆𝚎 𝚆𝚒𝚕𝚕 𝚆𝚒𝚗.
Reposted by Joel
jjinandtonic.bsky.social
oh baby disease tracking is gonna get so much worse
jjinandtonic.bsky.social
Remembering when the CDC/FDA tracked all foodborne diseases
Wolverine holding a picture frame
Reposted by Joel
beijingpalmer.bsky.social
this man's name is written in the book of life
polyparadigm.bsky.social
2 fully depreciated 17-year-olds maybe
polyparadigm.bsky.social
Crude oil is traded in “blue barrel” units, which are 42 US gallons
polyparadigm.bsky.social
Right: none of the ancient runes; rather, the fake ones dreamed up by willfully ignorant cosplayers in a fit of romantic bigotry
Reposted by Joel
tomtomorrow.bsky.social
whatever's in the epstein files must be *really* nasty news for R's
Reposted by Joel
Reposted by Joel
darthbluesky.bsky.social
the republican majority leader with a clear vision for the democratic party
atrupar.com
Thune: "If the Democrats had won the majority, they probably would've tried to nuke the filibuster. And then you'd have four new senators from Puerto Rico and DC, you'd have a packed Supreme Court, you'd have abortion on demand ... "
Reposted by Joel
nuclearanthro.bsky.social
🎶thread🎶 (as the kids say) on riot-control agents.
dankaszeta.bsky.social
Since many of you cannot read my 2019 piece on tear gas in Nature, I will kindly replicate it for you:

Kaszeta, Dan. "Restrict use of riot-control chemicals." Nature 573.7772 (2019): 27-29.
Reposted by Joel
markhisted.org
Russell Vought has announced that "mass firings [RIFs] have begun."

Lawless. The RIFs in the spring were illegal, as Judge Illston outlined. Yes, the conservative SCOTUS supermajority lawlessly signed off. But the Calvinball Court is not doing law.

Congress can stop this. A thread: 1/
'RIFs have begun.' Vought announces start of mass firings during government shutdown
The White House budget office said Friday that mass firings of federal workers have started in an attempt to exert more pressure on Democratic lawmakers as the government shutdown continues.
www.pbs.org
Reposted by Joel
alexandragallant.com
Frogby is a fan of the Portland frogs
my little frog Frogby in the style/colors of the Portland protest inflatable frog costume, his eyes are red, he has a lighter belly and darker spots on his arms and legs and is smiling
polyparadigm.bsky.social
Same tbh, and several of our neighbors too

Southeast Portland is pretty great
polyparadigm.bsky.social
Pastel-colored unicorn maybe?
caitlinmoriah.bsky.social
there are SO many more inflatable costumes tonight. clearly we have settled on a motif
Wide shot of many people in inflatable costumes
polyparadigm.bsky.social
There were SCOTUS efforts to subvert elections too, most prominently Bush v. Gore and Shelby v. Holder
polyparadigm.bsky.social
As the title might suggest, Proust and the Squid gives an overview of the two fronts of cognitive science (downward from phenomena of function toward mechanism, vs. upward from anatomy toward systems) focused on what we know about literacy; I recommend it to anyone asking questions like yours above
Reposted by Joel
olivia.science
as a cognitive scientist, I can confirm we don't know how humans think