People want identity shortcuts for "who is worth listening to" and "which ideas are correct" and I implore you all to abandon that impulse, because that's not the world we live in.

Listen to the marginalized because our voices are erased, but also... think. Judge by word and deed.

Thanks Vin

Congrats folks I know you've been working hard for this

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

Please help Mohammed protect his children and ensure the survival of himself and his family. You can help by sharing and donating even a small amount

Hi all,

I need to ask for help again. I have some longer-term goals to work toward paying off, and if I want to keep my website active, it's definitely going to be hard to make rent this month. We'd be grateful for any shares and donations. Thank you all so much. ❤️

#helpsky

gofund.me/a0978348

Art by • Gerald Brom

I despise wealth music

This is a really vulnerable time for paypro call centers. It's already been reported that Mastercard is stressed by our persistence

I know we're all busy around this time too but let's fire the engines 🔥

This is what we need from you, cis allies. Sorry-not-sorry, but you're going to have to recognize that the only response to the violence we face as a community is enough force in response to make it wholly not worth the attempt.

Like, it's seriously worth it for everyone involved in this discussion to remember that *this is a cishet man.*
These people would not tolerate a trans woman doing this.
Indeed, he is trying to bring up times trans women have been slandered for smut in a poor attempt to legitimize his argument.

"don't those awful bitches deserve a good dicking? haha i'm one of you"

now they're trying to pull "jennifer connelly is 54 in 2025, therefore it's not weird to sexualize her role in a film she starred in at age 14." take notes, abuse apologists, the line is now: nothing you do to a child matters if that child later becomes an adult

it's not about "problematic smut" for fucks sake it's about serial sexual harassment and how he talks *TO REAL WOMEN* and honestly every single person trying to obfuscate that by claiming it's just "problematic smut" is 100% self reporting

Honestly, his best defense is simply that he's not a good writer or very clever.

Julian's defenders are giving it more thought than he ever has because Julian is simply not very deep. He's not as clever as he thinks he is and you're all doing the heavy lifting for a guy who doesn't really think about things that deeply.

3. Eroticizing politics is fine. Insisting that women eroticize a feminist slogan to make you comfortable is not, esp outside a kink scenario.
4. Telling women they give you "school shooter vibes" is shockingly tone-deaf considering the biggest indicator of mass violence is prior misogynist violence

1. Kill all men is a deliberately provocative phrase meant to piss you off. Society takes this unserious "misandry" more seriously than violent misogyny.
2. There's no both sides. A man who says he's going to kill a woman is probably going to do it. He's got patriarchy on his side.

he openly brags about writing rape erotica about his female coworkers and getting off to women's abuse

The Nonce Formerly Known As Prince Andrew.

Hey fuck face people have been talking about this for years you mocked them for not taking your dipshit pet concerns more seriously

Also it's not just Korean cuisine he's been doing this to. He's been bastardising Asian cuisine for many years. Indian, Thai and many others. He's a menace!

after looking this up it's wild that jamie oliver used absolutely no korean ingredients in his "korean fried rice"

- american bbq sauce
- thai/viet sriracha
- american basmati (ben's original), boiled
- mint and coriander
- plain western cabbage

it's as korean as i am nigerian or venezuelan