Christian Moore-Anderson
banner
cmooreanderson.bsky.social
Christian Moore-Anderson
@cmooreanderson.bsky.social
● Biology Teacher (11–18) | Head of Biology (IBDP)
● Author of Teaching Meaning, Difference Maker, and Biology Made Real
● Interested in enactive cognitive science in teaching
Blog: rb.gy/dyi5a
Randall Beer's iconic diagram:
Engagement with the world happens through the body.

See Ezequiel Di Paolo "Picturing Organisms in their Environment".
February 12, 2026 at 2:10 PM
Reposted by Christian Moore-Anderson
When Musk said the "cumulative sum of human knowledge has been exhausted" for training AI, what he was really saying is that he would not pay for digitisation, and had reached the limits of useful data he could scrape for free. The GenAI house is built on sand.
Right, another key thing that historians do is working with important records that have not been digitized.

And the vast majority of the world’s records *have not been digitized* and thus do not exist in any format that LLMs/AI can work with.
it's literally impossible for an LLM to do a historian's job

it's not even LLMs sucking it's that they need data input to do anything and where's that data supposed to be coming from without historians

never met a computer that can dig through a thousand year old book in a library
February 12, 2026 at 9:15 AM
Hypothesis:
The "holding students to account for their learning" rhetoric drives teaching practice towards "teachers acting on students", rather than "acting with" students.
For example, a hard culture of "Checking for listening", "Cold Calling", "All hands up", etc.
February 12, 2026 at 8:38 AM
Variation is absolutely key to learning.

However, I'm going to guess that if retrieval practice isn't working in a context, it might be because in that context people treat learning as storing and retrieving.
#EduSky
February 12, 2026 at 7:05 AM
Reposted by Christian Moore-Anderson
"It is worth rehearsing what it actually takes for a piece of homework to be sent home with a child... the workload burden of homework, both implementation and oversight, is immense"

www.tes.com/magazine/lea...
What if… schools all stopped setting homework?
As part of our thought experiment series, Naveen Rizvi asks whether homework is worth the workload cost – and if anyone would miss it if every school stopped setting it
www.tes.com
February 10, 2026 at 9:27 AM
On another note, getting back to cognitivism, the metaphors here suggest that the brain works serially as an information processor. But, enactivists, like Francisco Varela, were arguing back in the 1980s that the brain does not, in any way, process things serially.
This is clearly a post from within cognitivism.

But what do the EduCogSciers have to say about this? For me, it clearly draws a distinction between knowledge and understanding. Something that many EduCogSciers have denied (knowledge = understanding).

#EduSky
On the difference between learning that scales and learning that doesn't, and what a concept from computer science can teach us about where educational technology succeeds and where it reliably fails. carlhendrick.substack.com/p/the-embarr...
February 10, 2026 at 8:43 AM
Reposted by Christian Moore-Anderson
This is why we slowed down our phonics learning and built in a school wide reading for pleasure programme (thank you @teresacremin.bsky.social and team). CLPE has helped us to shift away from atomised grammar and we have 'every place is a reading place' nooks and crannies all over. Our kids ❤️ books.
From the full report:

"Despite the regular comprehension HQIM use and focus...in 67% of the lessons, teachers and students engaged in work (i.e., instruction, engagement, and activity) that only facilitated students’ surface-level understanding of texts."

www.sri.com/wp-content/u...
February 9, 2026 at 5:10 PM
Reposted by Christian Moore-Anderson
From the full report:

"Despite the regular comprehension HQIM use and focus...in 67% of the lessons, teachers and students engaged in work (i.e., instruction, engagement, and activity) that only facilitated students’ surface-level understanding of texts."

www.sri.com/wp-content/u...
February 9, 2026 at 4:25 PM
Retrieval quizzes
What’s a routine you’ve stopped doing because it was noise, not impact?
February 9, 2026 at 2:01 PM
Taught my paradigmatic model last week: Blood glucose regulation.
This time, I decided to remove the stock "glucose in intestine" to keep the focus on the dynamics within the body.
I like how it turned out.
By having a tool to converse with, models really help us coordinate our meanings.
February 9, 2026 at 8:49 AM
A tough but incredibly rewarding book for me is Maturana's The Origin of Humanness in the Biology of Love.

It paints a very different picture from this. Humans are a loving species who get physically ill when deprived of it.
www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/... I hated this book as part of my GCSE and I hate how it is often seen as a genuine piece of social/psychological research - hopefully it will be presented as more of an indictment of the class system/public schooling than my experience of childhood and people
Lord of the Flies cast and creatives on bringing William Golding's book to screens -
The story of schoolboys stranded on a tropical island with no adults following a deadly plane crash is adapted for television for the first time by Jack Thorne
www.bbc.co.uk
February 9, 2026 at 8:29 AM
Reposted by Christian Moore-Anderson
The metaphor indicated a distinction, the distinction was noted and explored, learning began to be seen this way, people talked about it, the metaphor became good and matched experience.

I think they matched my past experience but don't match my experience now I have different metaphors.
February 8, 2026 at 3:48 PM
Reposted by Christian Moore-Anderson
Teachers, let's stop referring to students as storers and retrievers. They're not. And when we use this language, we bring forth an epistemology that shapes our practice.

This article misses that enactive cognitive science (not cognitivism) has been saying this since the 80s
aeon.co/essays/your-...
Your brain does not process information and it is not a computer | Aeon Essays
Your brain does not process information, retrieve knowledge or store memories. In short: your brain is not a computer
aeon.co
February 7, 2026 at 6:51 AM
Reposted by Christian Moore-Anderson
That’s a perfect example. We’ve narrowed the ‘allowed’ space for children so much that normal play is treated as disruption-even on a cul-de-sac. When streets, parks & ‘just being outside’ become contested, kids get pushed indoors & online. It’s not only a tech issue, it’s a social permission issue.
February 8, 2026 at 11:23 AM
Reposted by Christian Moore-Anderson
We’re treating social media like a moral failing rather than an infrastructure substitute.

When young people have no safe, low-cost third spaces, the phone becomes the youth club, the park and the bus pass.

If we restrict that, we need to replace it with real-world belonging, not just rules.
Kids can't hang out in parks. They can't hang out at the mall. They don't have 3rd spaces because no one wants kids around and then we are surprised when they rely on SM for connection.
If you take that away, what do they have left?
www.theguardian.com/australia-ne...

The impacts of locking under 16 yos from their social media networks are now beginning to bite for those young people who relied on them for social connection
February 8, 2026 at 10:05 AM
This is clearly a post from within cognitivism.

But what do the EduCogSciers have to say about this? For me, it clearly draws a distinction between knowledge and understanding. Something that many EduCogSciers have denied (knowledge = understanding).

#EduSky
On the difference between learning that scales and learning that doesn't, and what a concept from computer science can teach us about where educational technology succeeds and where it reliably fails. carlhendrick.substack.com/p/the-embarr...
Mastered But Not Understood: Why Learning Doesn’t Scale the Way We Think It Does
On the "embarrassingly parallel problem" and what it reveals about the limits of learning technology.
carlhendrick.substack.com
February 8, 2026 at 9:38 AM
I declare this book finished.

It's been intense. So much editing. This is the most important work I've written.
As far as I'm aware, the first book for general teachers that's deeply rooted in *enactive* cognitive science.

Teaching Meaning: What Works When Telling Isn't Enough

Out soon!
February 8, 2026 at 8:08 AM
Reposted by Christian Moore-Anderson
We spend a lot of time talking about engagement.

Much less time talking about investment.

This short, free guide explores how schools can move from "what's the point" to kids getting properly stuck in - day in, day out - by design

📘 Implementing botheredness (12-min read)

Link in comments below
February 7, 2026 at 3:26 PM
Reposted by Christian Moore-Anderson
... agree... and see them as children or young adults.
February 7, 2026 at 10:00 AM
Reposted by Christian Moore-Anderson
"As we navigate through the world, we are changed by a variety of experiences."

Maybe the reason I remember a Shakespeare quote is because it changed me.

"...screw your courage to the sticking place..." makes me feel

But even that I had to look up a few days ago to "retrieve" it accurately.
Teachers, let's stop referring to students as storers and retrievers. They're not. And when we use this language, we bring forth an epistemology that shapes our practice.

This article misses that enactive cognitive science (not cognitivism) has been saying this since the 80s
aeon.co/essays/your-...
Your brain does not process information and it is not a computer | Aeon Essays
Your brain does not process information, retrieve knowledge or store memories. In short: your brain is not a computer
aeon.co
February 7, 2026 at 7:30 AM
Teachers, let's stop referring to students as storers and retrievers. They're not. And when we use this language, we bring forth an epistemology that shapes our practice.

This article misses that enactive cognitive science (not cognitivism) has been saying this since the 80s
aeon.co/essays/your-...
Your brain does not process information and it is not a computer | Aeon Essays
Your brain does not process information, retrieve knowledge or store memories. In short: your brain is not a computer
aeon.co
February 7, 2026 at 6:51 AM
Reposted by Christian Moore-Anderson
Increasingly being submitted AI-written articles. Even the worst human writing has an abundance of signals about the writer in the choices they make. AI-written pieces give no signals and that is deeply weird to read. Some common features include...
February 4, 2026 at 10:09 AM
Reposted by Christian Moore-Anderson
The tension isn't just intensity vs. time wasting - it's structure vs. autonomy.

We all know schools can be both inefficient *and* overwhelming because we've optimised for management not learning.

The real question is whether children get agency over their attention & time in a bloated curriculum
February 3, 2026 at 9:17 PM