Christian Moore-Anderson
banner
cmooreanderson.bsky.social
Christian Moore-Anderson
@cmooreanderson.bsky.social
● Biology Teacher (11–18)
● Author of Teaching Meaning, Difference Maker, and Biology Made Real
● Interested in enactive cognitive science in teaching
Blog: rb.gy/dyi5a
Could Bluesky being the meeting point for teachers looking beyond reductive EduCognitivism?
How do we get more people to join here and discuss?
LinkedIn is such a swamp for discussion.
February 16, 2026 at 5:37 AM
Reposted by Christian Moore-Anderson
Reposted by Christian Moore-Anderson
The best example of this is a hilarious PPT slide from @ofstednews.bsky.social about toilet training as a series of 'knowledge items' that had to be memorised in a correct sequence. Great way to show that they don't understand toilet training. @thepetitioner.bsky.social do you still have a copy?
February 15, 2026 at 8:28 AM
Reposted by Christian Moore-Anderson
The other day, @agittner.bsky.social prompted me to describe how I would teach a concept.

I found it almost impossible.

And, it had me wondering why, a full time biology teacher, head of biology, & someone who has written so much on biology education, couldn't do it easily.

Here's my answer 🧵
February 13, 2026 at 8:02 AM
Now, this is up my street!
Yet, I'd've liked stronger final claim:
We bring forth a world in drawing distinctions: this *is* the nature of knowledge.
You can't remove yourself from your distinctions.
Although, in conversing a community can create standards to bring forth "objective" distinctions.
New on Substack: New post: Why does dividing curriculum into knowledge components feel so unstable? Because we're imposing localist structure on a distributed system. The brain doesn't store knowledge in pieces. profbeckyallen.substack.com/p/curriculum...
Curriculum Is a Localist Model of a Distributed Mind
The problem with dividing knowledge into pieces
profbeckyallen.substack.com
February 15, 2026 at 7:07 AM
Reposted by Christian Moore-Anderson
A great thread on learning and curriculum and SO, SO relevant to English too. Curriculum is about thinking and doing in the subject, growing through connections, and 'knowledge made, not given' (Harold Rosen).
The other day, @agittner.bsky.social prompted me to describe how I would teach a concept.

I found it almost impossible.

And, it had me wondering why, a full time biology teacher, head of biology, & someone who has written so much on biology education, couldn't do it easily.

Here's my answer 🧵
February 13, 2026 at 5:51 PM
Reposted by Christian Moore-Anderson
Is anyone else having ‘Research shows’ fatigue in their student body?

My classes yesterday were muttering about ‘if they hear ‘research shows…’ again etc’
February 14, 2026 at 7:41 AM
Reposted by Christian Moore-Anderson
I love this approach to teaching and it resonates with what I do in RS. Today Y7 learned about literal and metaphorical interpretations of the Biblical creation story - but that built upon ways of thinking about religions and worldviews that we began in lesson 1 , an understanding of...
The other day, @agittner.bsky.social prompted me to describe how I would teach a concept.

I found it almost impossible.

And, it had me wondering why, a full time biology teacher, head of biology, & someone who has written so much on biology education, couldn't do it easily.

Here's my answer 🧵
February 13, 2026 at 5:26 PM
Reposted by Christian Moore-Anderson
Please enjoy our research paper on how Bluesky is the preferred home of academics of all stripes, including professors of rare moths. (Yes, we actually have lots of entomologists here).

academic.oup.com/icb/article-... 🧪
February 12, 2026 at 3:03 PM
Reposted by Christian Moore-Anderson
Excellent🧵with another refreshing interrogation of (over-simplified) cogsci thinking.

How learning happens incrementally over time as students develop meaning through immersion in the discipline.
The other day, @agittner.bsky.social prompted me to describe how I would teach a concept.

I found it almost impossible.

And, it had me wondering why, a full time biology teacher, head of biology, & someone who has written so much on biology education, couldn't do it easily.

Here's my answer 🧵
February 13, 2026 at 9:43 AM
Reposted by Christian Moore-Anderson
After taking 7 years to write and draw, my new graphic novel, Speaking in Pictures, about language, cognition, comics, and visual communication is out in less than a week! At long last! www.visuallanguagelab.com/sip
February 13, 2026 at 12:24 PM
Reposted by Christian Moore-Anderson
What makes information processing in biological systems radically different from information processing in AI?

Here I claim that information processing in living systems is NECESSARILY qualitative because organisms love life & avoid death !

Because they have an end, the have an end, a goal: life!
The No Body Problem: Intelligence and Selfhood in Biological and Artificial Systems osf.io/preprints/ps...
OSF
osf.io
February 13, 2026 at 8:44 AM
The other day, @agittner.bsky.social prompted me to describe how I would teach a concept.

I found it almost impossible.

And, it had me wondering why, a full time biology teacher, head of biology, & someone who has written so much on biology education, couldn't do it easily.

Here's my answer 🧵
February 13, 2026 at 8:02 AM
Reposted by Christian Moore-Anderson
I'm partway through this episode now, and if you're interested in philosophy of biology it's a lot of fun!
February 12, 2026 at 12:16 AM
Reposted by Christian Moore-Anderson
🧵So, what works when teaching reading comprehension in the classroom? To a whole class?

I dedicated a entire chapter of my Phd thesis to exploring the literature on this.

In fact, we do not know a lot about what works when teachers teach, to whole classes.

1/8
February 12, 2026 at 7:18 PM
Randall Beer's iconic diagram:
Engagement with the world happens through the body.

See Ezequiel Di Paolo "Picturing Organisms in their Environment".
February 12, 2026 at 2:10 PM
Reposted by Christian Moore-Anderson
When Musk said the "cumulative sum of human knowledge has been exhausted" for training AI, what he was really saying is that he would not pay for digitisation, and had reached the limits of useful data he could scrape for free. The GenAI house is built on sand.
Right, another key thing that historians do is working with important records that have not been digitized.

And the vast majority of the world’s records *have not been digitized* and thus do not exist in any format that LLMs/AI can work with.
it's literally impossible for an LLM to do a historian's job

it's not even LLMs sucking it's that they need data input to do anything and where's that data supposed to be coming from without historians

never met a computer that can dig through a thousand year old book in a library
February 12, 2026 at 9:15 AM
Hypothesis:
The "holding students to account for their learning" rhetoric drives teaching practice towards "teachers acting on students", rather than "acting with" students.
For example, a hard culture of "Checking for listening", "Cold Calling", "All hands up", etc.
February 12, 2026 at 8:38 AM
Variation is absolutely key to learning.

However, I'm going to guess that if retrieval practice isn't working in a context, it might be because in that context people treat learning as storing and retrieving.
#EduSky
February 12, 2026 at 7:05 AM
Reposted by Christian Moore-Anderson
"It is worth rehearsing what it actually takes for a piece of homework to be sent home with a child... the workload burden of homework, both implementation and oversight, is immense"

www.tes.com/magazine/lea...
What if… schools all stopped setting homework?
As part of our thought experiment series, Naveen Rizvi asks whether homework is worth the workload cost – and if anyone would miss it if every school stopped setting it
www.tes.com
February 10, 2026 at 9:27 AM
On another note, getting back to cognitivism, the metaphors here suggest that the brain works serially as an information processor. But, enactivists, like Francisco Varela, were arguing back in the 1980s that the brain does not, in any way, process things serially.
This is clearly a post from within cognitivism.

But what do the EduCogSciers have to say about this? For me, it clearly draws a distinction between knowledge and understanding. Something that many EduCogSciers have denied (knowledge = understanding).

#EduSky
On the difference between learning that scales and learning that doesn't, and what a concept from computer science can teach us about where educational technology succeeds and where it reliably fails. carlhendrick.substack.com/p/the-embarr...
February 10, 2026 at 8:43 AM