Cyrus Hall
@cyrushall.bsky.social
1K followers 550 following 1.8K posts
Mass car use is geometrically incompatible with great cities. Transit & bikes are the future. Tech things sometimes.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
cyrushall.bsky.social
The 12 Folsom could really use some transit priority love.
Reposted by Cyrus Hall
cyrushall.bsky.social
Looks like the lack of afterburners in the Snowbirds' acrobatics resolves ~90% of the complaints the Blue Angels used to get.
cyrushall.bsky.social
Getting groups of riders up to Sac once or twice a year is good, but it's deeply insufficient. Public transit needs multiple people pushing legislators full time, getting to know them well, understanding how they think, understanding how they power map.
cyrushall.bsky.social
Lobbying, you say? Yes, lobbying. Most politicians in Sacramento are woefully uninformed about public transit. They've rarely if ever taken it, they see it as a subsidy for the poor (and thus negotiable), and see the only state role as support capital investment/small county ops support.
cyrushall.bsky.social
...yet the state loan to keep Bay Area transit from collapsing? Still not finalized, and not a clear priority for Newsom.

Outside of @caltransit.bsky.social, I'm not aware of any full-time public transit advocates in Sac. Advocates need to figure out how pipeline funding to lobbying like YIMBY has.
cyrushall.bsky.social
I'm happy to see Newsom signed SB 79. It's an imperfect step in the right direction, and we wait for perfect at our peril.

But it is frustrating that there is so little holistic vision at the state level. There was no delay and virtually no debate over AB 697 to spend half a billion on SR 37...
bryanculbertson.com
A state that is prioritizing building housing near transit stations should fund transit operations
Reposted by Cyrus Hall
kenwhite.bsky.social
But that’s no excuse for not showing up.

Show up to a protest on the 18th. It’s a way to stand up and be counted for the proposition that what these people are doing to your country is not right, not acceptable.
Reposted by Cyrus Hall
lataco.bsky.social
DAILY MEMO: Another ICE Detention Death and A Woman is Saved From ICE By Police 🧵 2 parts

If you appreciate reporting like this, please consider becoming a member of L.A. TACO, buying some merch, or dropping a dime in our fundraiser so we can continue to bring you this news.
@eltragon.bsky.social
Reposted by Cyrus Hall
calelectricrail.org
This one highway is projected to cost 85% of what CA has spent on high-speed rail over 15 years and hundreds of miles. If we can afford this, we can afford high-speed rail.
alfredtwu.com
The entire proposed Highway 37 Solano-Marin super bridge is estimated to cost $11 billion, all to replace an existing road between a couple of suburbs. And it's proposed at 114 feet wide.

For comparison, the Golden Gate Bridge is 90 feet wide.
warrenjwells.bsky.social
Caltrans has released a cross section for the ultimate (raised viaduct) version of SR-37.

Now maybe I'm just being paranoid, but if you were building a road that you planned to keep at 4 lanes wide, I don't think it would look like this.
cyrushall.bsky.social
And we should trust you because...? You're a nameless person whose account does nothing but shill for hydrogen.

Go waste other people's time.
cyrushall.bsky.social
🙄

Go waste other's time with your FUD.
cyrushall.bsky.social
And yes, clearly 1420 has already passed. Never said otherwise. Your whole approach to this thread has been redirection and distraction every time your claims are countered with evidence. It's classic FUD.
cyrushall.bsky.social
History is also full of astroturf groups and phony social media accounts run by marketing firms. 🤷
cyrushall.bsky.social
So everyone that opposed SB 1420 is a stooge of the fossil fuel industry (NRDC, Sierra Club, etc), yet the fossil fuel industry supported SB 1420 (SoCal Gas, SDGE, etc)?

Can you make that make sense for me? To not be a gas stooge of you need to support the bill supported by the gas industry? 🤯
cyrushall.bsky.social
1) The targets in SB 1420 are targets, not reality. The leg analysis is, however, clear: "Nearly all hydrogen produced for use in California today is the relatively dirty gray variety."

2) Environmental orgs near unanimously opposed SB 1420. The DoE's 4kg/CO2e per 1kg H2 is not accepted as "clean."
Best Fit for Hydrogen’s Future Use. California will likely rely on hydrogen to
decarbonize certain targeted sectors. However, despite decades of active investment and
support across different use cases and technologies, the majority of hydrogen demand in
the state today remains in the form of petroleum refining and ammonia production, and
upwards of 95% of that hydrogen is sourced from fossil fuels. Hydrogen can be used to
decarbonize the power sector, transportation, industry, and buildings, but whether it
should be used in certain cases across each of those sectors (due to considerations of
economics, efficiency, etc.) remains an unsettled debate, and one the ARCHES hub is
meant to help elucidate.
cyrushall.bsky.social
It's just me using 15 different clipper cards because BART no longer tells me how much money I have left. /s

This is a really amazing result. 112% of pre-pandemic riders! A result the agencies should really emphasize as showing trust in the systems as we go into election season.
cyrushall.bsky.social
What's your source for that? According to industry sources - the sources most likely to overstate that number - green hydrogen was less than 1% of all produced hydrogen in the US in 2023.
Mapped: Global Hydrogen Production by Region - Fuelcellsworks
Explore the global landscape of hydrogen production, with a breakdown of blue and green hydrogen production by region in 2023.
fuelcellsworks.com
cyrushall.bsky.social
At least they made it a u_int of some seemingly demented, non-standard size?
cyrushall.bsky.social
What percentage of hydrogen used in California is green? Feels like this is an important question. 1-2%? How much additional money does green hydrogen cost?

Who puts the most money into hydrogen lobbying in Sacramento? Last I checked, it was SoCal gas.

Hydrogen *is* the fossil fuel industry line.
cyrushall.bsky.social
My only takeaway here is that one ignores framing to the peril of their preferred policy.