Anna Harper (she/her)
banner
docaharper.bsky.social
Anna Harper (she/her)
@docaharper.bsky.social
Climate, carbon cycle, Earth system modeling, and land based mitigation | Passionate about education and solutions-oriented projects | Assoc prof in Geography & Atmospheric Sciences at the University of Georgia | Views my own. Also ☕🏃🏼‍♀️🚴🏼‍♀🏊🏾‍♀️☕
Pinned
Greetings! 👋🏼 I'm a climate scientist studying the role of vegetation & soils in our future climate. I'm also a geography professor at UGA & a UGA alum (go Dawgs!).

I work with Earth system models (lots of desk time), so I get outside to enjoy nature and exercise as much as I can. We only have one 🌍
Reposted by Anna Harper (she/her)
COP30: Study reveals “highest possible ambition” for countries' climate pledges

With COP30 kicking off on Monday, a new paper by Julia Schönfeld and Professor Joeri Rogelj provides a framework for assessing countries’ climate pledges 🧵

Learn more: ow.ly/CiB050XnMK2
COP30: Study reveals “highest possible ambition” for countries' climate pledges | Imperial News | Imperial College London
A new study, for the first time, shows how the ‘highest possible ambition’ of countries' climate pledges can be assessed.
ow.ly
November 6, 2025 at 2:07 PM
Happening tomorrow: National Academies webinar on AI for Emulation: Weather & Earth Systems Modeling, 10:00 ET. www.nationalacademies.org/event/45650_...
www.nationalacademies.org
September 22, 2025 at 8:10 PM
Ignoring the harmful effects of climate change will also affect national security.
Today, 20+ senior national security leaders submitted their critique of the DOE's climate report -- "wholly inadequate" for tackling the security risks posed by climate change. Signees include the former Commandant of the Coast Guard, PACOM commander & AFRICOM commander. Read their comment here:
20+ National Security Leaders and the Center for Climate & Security Critique the US Department of Energy Climate Report - The Council on Strategic Risks
CCS and nearly two dozen senior national security leaders find DOE’s latest climate report to be wholly inadequate in addressing the national security risk posed by climate change.
councilonstrategicrisks.org
September 2, 2025 at 5:14 PM
Having spent much actual and emotional time and energy responding to this report, I whole-heartedly agree. Greenhouse gas emissions are bad for our planet, it's not a matter for debate.
To be clear, we really do not need to and should not be having to use our time 'debating' this fantastical nonsense in 2025. There are enough real bits of actual climate science to do. The collective brainpower expended on this by so many scientists could have been -much- better spent.
Great article in the NYTimes about our comment to the DOE about their climate report.

Gift link:
www.nytimes.com/2025/09/02/c...
September 2, 2025 at 2:35 PM
Good things are happening today - the side entrance to my building is open again, so I no longer have to carry my bike up stairs and through the main entrance. It's the little things.
August 22, 2025 at 1:15 PM
I'm excited to contribute to the next IPCC report as a lead author for the WG1 chapter on "Global projections of Earth system responses across scales". We'll be assessing forcings of climate change and the responses across the Earth systems, including my favorite component 🥁... the carbon cycle.
The #IPCC has announced the authors selected for its Seventh Assessment Report.

664 experts from 111 countries have been invited to participate as Coordinating Lead Authors, Lead Authors, & Review Editors.

🌍 51% from developing countries
🚺 46% women

🔗 bit.ly/AR7AuthorsPR
August 19, 2025 at 4:12 AM
Reposted by Anna Harper (she/her)
The recent DOE climate science report misrepresents the work of many researchers. Carbon Brief asked those cited to review the parts of the report where their work was used, and we collectively found 100+ misleading or false statements: interactive.carbonbr...
August 14, 2025 at 4:40 PM
Challenge: post your latest photo taken in DC to show what a hell-hole it is:

I went for a run on my own at 6:15am and felt perfectly safe the whole time.
August 12, 2025 at 2:22 AM
Sure, this is completely normal ...
This is the US Constitution page @ the Library of Congress

Sections 9 and 10 have been removed

9 includes habeas corpus, the courts' review of unlawful detention & imprisonment

This gov't can't change the Constitution w/ sneaky editing, but it's a new low: constitution.congress.gov/constitution/
August 6, 2025 at 9:17 PM
It's a great day to speak out against misinformation and lies designed to weaken climate regulation - follow the prompts below to enter your public comment on the EPA's proposed ditching of the Endangerment Finding.
🚨 It's day 6 of #31DaysofAction and EPA’s Endangerment Finding is under attack. That means your right to clean air is too.

✍️ Make your voice heard: Submit written comments at www.regulations.gov/document/EPA...

#StandUpForScience
Regulations.gov
www.regulations.gov
August 6, 2025 at 7:59 PM
Reposted by Anna Harper (she/her)
“In his second administration, President Donald Trump is not just approaching climate science with skepticism. Instead, his administration is moving to destroy the methods by which his or any future administration can respond to climate change.“
Analysis: The US government has declared war on the very idea of climate change | CNN Politics
Americans are used to whiplash in their climate policy. The US has been in and out and in and out again of the key Paris climate agreement over the past four presidencies.
www.cnn.com
August 2, 2025 at 7:58 PM
Reposted by Anna Harper (she/her)
A few quick takes:

- the 'critical review' features a number of pretty standard and rebunked tropes.
- Spencer's 2024 (un-peer-reviewed) report for Heritage features strongly - and that was a hot mess of picked cherries: www.realclimate.org/index.php/ar...
RealClimate: Spencer’s Shenanigans
RealClimate: A recent sensible-sounding piece by Roy Spencer for the Heritage foundation is full of misrepresentations. Let's play spot the fallacy.
www.realclimate.org
July 29, 2025 at 9:03 PM
Reposted by Anna Harper (she/her)
----- "Humans cannot possibly change the weather through greenhouse gas emissions causing climate change, that’s blasphemous"

Oh by the way and those same people ---- "Humans are changing the weather with weather machines, cloud seeding, and magical weather fairies with help from the groundhog"
July 9, 2025 at 11:45 PM
Reposted by Anna Harper (she/her)
🔔Trump’s Fool’s Gold EO is facing MAJOR backlash.

THOUSANDS of scientists, academics, & physicians - including us - are speaking out against this political assault on science.

Our Open Letter is featured here:
www.nytimes.com/2025/06/03/c...
The White House Gutted Science Funding. Now It Wants to ‘Correct’ Research.
www.nytimes.com
June 3, 2025 at 7:33 PM
My favorite dataset. For 65 years, it has recorded the seasonal breathing of the Earth due to photosynthesis & respiration, the steady rise of CO2 from burning fossil fuels, and year-to-year changes from factors like El Nino. Losing it & other atmospheric monitoring would handicap future discovery.
May 6, 2025 at 11:50 PM
Me sending a self nomination to the US State Department to participate in the IPCC AR7.
(I'm grateful to AGU for providing the opportunity for us to send nominations that won't just go into the void.)
a cockroach is crawling on the ground with the word hello written above it
Alt: A cricket is crawling on the ground with the words "Hello?" "Anybody home?" "Guys?" flashing above it.
media.tenor.com
April 8, 2025 at 3:59 PM
Congrats to these fabulous students on presenting their research projects at UGA's undergraduate research symposium today! I presented at this symposium in 2002(!), and it was a pivotal time of discovering how much I love research. I'm thrilled to be able to offer similar opportunities now.
April 8, 2025 at 2:46 AM
Reposted by Anna Harper (she/her)
Booker finally yields after more than 25 hours of speaking 👏👏👏
April 2, 2025 at 12:08 AM
Reposted by Anna Harper (she/her)
We've extended our youth survey deadline to 31 March!

Share your priorities and make your voice heard on environmental challenges.

Take the survey in [English, Español, Français, Pусский, 中文]: tinyurl.com/5n7auhef
March 11, 2025 at 1:31 PM
Good showing in Atlanta today for #standupforscience, where many people work in health sciences or with the CDC. I feel inspired by the creative signs and speakers.
March 7, 2025 at 11:41 PM
Reposted by Anna Harper (she/her)
Très forte mobilisation à Jussieu Paris #StandUpForScience
March 7, 2025 at 3:51 PM
I'm taking part in @standupforscience.bsky.social in Atlanta on Friday! The landscape for US scientists has forever changed in just 6 wks. I hope this event highlights how many people are affected by Trump's destructive actions. If nothing else, I'll be enjoying these cookies with my friends.
March 7, 2025 at 3:21 AM
Reposted by Anna Harper (she/her)
Bottom line: The intentional loss of exceptional scientists and other terrific public servants at NOAA leaves our country less safe and more vulnerable.
February 27, 2025 at 11:12 PM
Reposted by Anna Harper (she/her)
Federal science agencies are under threat. AGU has made it easy to advocate for NSF, NOAA, NASA and more. Visit AGU’s Science Policy Action Center to stand up for science.

fromtheprow.agu.org/standing-tog...
February 19, 2025 at 12:13 AM
Exciting opportunity to work with my former colleagues (@pfriedling.bsky.social et al) at @exeter.ac.uk:

✅ Nice place to live
✅ Great colleagues
✅ Fun times integrating land surface models & Earth Obs data
✅ Three year postdoc to support global carbon monitoring

jobs.exeter.ac.uk keyword: Q01368
February 12, 2025 at 9:08 PM