Kevin Zollman
@kevinzollman.com
7.6K followers 1.7K following 5.4K posts
Philosophy and Game Theory at Carnegie Mellon 🦚 Research the interface between philosophy, economics, and biology 💱 www.kevinzollman.com
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
kevinzollman.com
I did the thing you are never supposed to do. I wrote a (rough draft of a) textbook: Theories of Rational Decision

It's technical, but from a philosophical perspective. It focuses on the normative theory but touches on some behavioral issues as well.

raw.githubusercontent.com/kzollman/Rat...
raw.githubusercontent.com
kevinzollman.com
Isn't funding replication exactly that?
Reposted by Kevin Zollman
cmu-neuroscience.bsky.social
Come along with CMU Professor Timothy Verstynen for a playful dive into the “neuroscience of zombies,” where movie monsters meet real brain science. Along the way you’ll learn some surprising truths about how our own minds and bodies work.
Wednesday, October 29, Noon ET On Zoom
tinyurl.com/4e5pn3xa
kevinzollman.com
p-hacking isn't methodologically sound, but multiple studies looking for one kind of association is pretty much the norm.
Reposted by Kevin Zollman
danhicks.bsky.social
The "gold standard science" stuff plays on the same oversimplified picture of science, and that's part of the reason scientists have had such weak-ass responses to it
kevinzollman.com
It's not that I think RFK is going to do good science on this topic. I think it's important to criticize it for the right reasons.

I think perpetuating the children's version of the scientific method leads to scientific skepticism.
kevinzollman.com
It's not that I think RFK is going to do good science on this topic. I think it's important to criticize it for the right reasons.

I think perpetuating the children's version of the scientific method leads to scientific skepticism.
kevinzollman.com
Even more reflective ones will often have a very narrow view of science. They presume that all science works like their narrow subfield. They define "the scientific method" in a way that makes most science "not science."
kevinzollman.com
A reoccurring frustration for philosophers of science: Many scientists know how to do science like people know how to ride a bike. When they reflect on the practice of science, they repeat platitudes about how science works. Those platitudes are often wrong, sometimes even about their own field
danhicks.bsky.social
*sighs in philosopher of science*

Looking for confirmatory evidence is an entirely normal part of science. The primary problem here is the eugenics and the fascism, not the lies to children about "the scientific method."
One Bluesky account is quoting another. Inner post has a video of RFK Jr., some person I don't recognize (Tylenol and autism guy, maybe?), Marco Rubio (I think), and Trump. Post text: "RFK Jr on Tylenol and autism: 'It is not proof. We're doing the studies to make the proof." 

Outer post text: "We're doing studies to prove it (* not how studies work)"
Reposted by Kevin Zollman
danhicks.bsky.social
*sighs in philosopher of science*

Looking for confirmatory evidence is an entirely normal part of science. The primary problem here is the eugenics and the fascism, not the lies to children about "the scientific method."
One Bluesky account is quoting another. Inner post has a video of RFK Jr., some person I don't recognize (Tylenol and autism guy, maybe?), Marco Rubio (I think), and Trump. Post text: "RFK Jr on Tylenol and autism: 'It is not proof. We're doing the studies to make the proof." 

Outer post text: "We're doing studies to prove it (* not how studies work)"
kevinzollman.com
I'm glad to see that blue sky moderation has realized that people need to be protected from K*nt
kevinzollman.com
They also get their own signs
A picture of a blue sign that says "wombat poo" in front of a lake and a tree
kevinzollman.com
It's uncontroversial to say, "I would have been better off if I hadn't stubbed my toe." So, we feel like any question of the form "would so-and-so have been better off if such-and-such hadn't happened." But I think sometimes those questions are just meaningless.
kevinzollman.com
It's difficult to think about whether someone would have been better off in radically different circumstances. Would someone who is now autistic have been better off if they weren't? Is it even sensible to talk about them being the same person? These questions don't always have clear answers
theferocity.bsky.social
I don’t exactly how to phrase this, but like… is autism that bad???? Like, why is it such a source of fear??? Of course there are challenges but you can be autistic and have a rich, fulfilling life! Many people do! I don’t understand the preoccupation.
Reposted by Kevin Zollman
kevinzollman.com
Thanks! I'm out of town this week, but I'll drop you an email when I'm back. I appreciate the time!
kevinzollman.com
Tried that trick. He said no
kevinzollman.com
Lol. I had to promise not to be a candidate in order to chair it. This was not a difficult promise to make.
kevinzollman.com
The sad irony is that he probably is more deserving that some people who already got one. (This is NOT a complement to Trump.)
rbreich.bsky.social
Donald Trump is ordering extrajudicial killings of suspected drug smugglers.

He's vilifying his political opponents and threatening to jail them.

His ICE agents are terrorizing immigrants and firing chemical agents at peaceful protestors.

And some people think he deserves a Nobel Peace Prize?
kevinzollman.com
Yeah! This is perhaps top of my personal worries. Any thoughts about how to spot such a person?
kevinzollman.com
I feel like I have a pretty good sense for what it takes to be a good Dean in our college. Less so about the process of finding this kind of person and about getting the college comfortable with the process. Any advice you have on this front is most welcome!
kevinzollman.com
I'm co-chairing the search committee for the new Dean. Anybody want to be Dean?

In all seriousness, to anybody who has done this before, got any advice?
Reposted by Kevin Zollman
rmkubinec.bsky.social
Yes, see, if we get rid of the immigrants, then Americans will win all the Nobel Prizes

OH WAIT
crampell.bsky.social
Immigrants have been awarded 40% of the Nobel Prizes won by Americans in chemistry, medicine and physics since 2000. nfap.com/research/new...
Reposted by Kevin Zollman
joeldavidhamkins.bsky.social
New post-doctoral position at Notre Dame
Core analytic/logic/phil math. philjobs.org/job/show/29622
2 year position, $75K annual salary plus $15K expense account. Please apply! (I am chairing this search.)
Reposted by Kevin Zollman
afterdinnerconversation.com
TEACHERS! After Dinner Conversation received a grant that allows us to offer a free sample philosophy ethics short story fiction books to educators for to use in their classes. No strings attached. And yes, we pay for shipping too.

buff.ly/xreh14w