Marios Richards
mariosrichards.bsky.social
Marios Richards
@mariosrichards.bsky.social
Frequently wrong. Please correct (effort involved appreciated).

Experiments with Data Visualisation:

https://github.com/MariosRichards/BES_analysis_code
https://medium.com/@mariosrichards
https://mariosrichards.substack.com/
Reposted by Marios Richards
After more than 10 years of “the Danish Model”, nativism is hegemonic in the country, the far right polls near level highs again, and the Social Democrats lost Copenhagen and poll at historic low.

European Social Democrats should look at the facts, not the myths!

Me in @theguardian.com
The ‘Danish model’ is the darling of centre-left parties like Labour. The problem is, it doesn’t even work in Denmark | Cas Mudde
This week’s local elections are the latest reminder that when social democrats move rightwards, they’re making a mistake, says academic and author Cas Mudde
www.theguardian.com
November 22, 2025 at 1:59 PM
Reposted by Marios Richards
If, like me, you are an enjoyer of Ben's patented bubble plots, you'll have likely noticed that voters cluster by ideology and not demographics.

My new preprint is on exactly that: osf.io/preprints/so...
November 21, 2025 at 4:47 PM
www.youtube.com/watch?v=xg29...

I am a victim of 2015 era Internet Nostalgia but every day I feel like another adultswim informercial has somehow turned into reality.
November 18, 2025 at 12:22 PM
Reposted by Marios Richards
We then ran a pairwise experiment.

They avoid this some of the issues around salience by forcing respondents to choose between two issues at a time, producing a clearer hierarchy.

When we use this method, Cost of Living concerns dominate, with immigration and asylum much lower.
November 17, 2025 at 11:41 AM
I find it hard to explain centre-left/right party behaviour - inside and outside the UK - other than that mere fact of Radical Right parties converging on *the % you'd expect them to get when not actively proscribed/associated with the losing side of WW2* drives them mad.
My more serious thoughts in Ricky's reply, but given the political situation, another reason this is a strange message to the PLP is that it really invites the joke 'why, who on earth is Shabana planning to appoint as Home Secretary when she becomes prime minister?'
What are your thoughts on their possible attempts at political blackmail? Will it work?
November 15, 2025 at 4:33 PM
Reposted by Marios Richards
A chart from "The British General Election of 2024" (out soon!) which is relevant to this debate - here's what voters wanted (black line) and what they though Labour (red) and Cons (blue) would do on tax and spend during the campaign. Higher figures = "put them up". Some important lessons here 1/?
November 14, 2025 at 10:42 AM
Reposted by Marios Richards
I've written a blog post about using metric unfolding to extract latent dimensions from data, using the ANES feeling thermometers & BES 'like' scales as examples.

It's a high-level intro to unfolding and using the smacof R package. These plots are the results.
philswatton.github.io/2025/11/05/e...
November 7, 2025 at 11:55 AM
So I mostly think this is just a side effect of

(i) polling where you give people lots of options other than broad income tax bump
(ii) political cueing (public support for tax rises for was at/near an all-time high until 2023*)

* curious what drives that 2023+ jump in 'reduce taxes' ...
November 3, 2025 at 11:20 AM
Very cool - I'm particularly interested in the algorithms to infer 'community structure' (LIB/RWA/ALT 'factors' connected to the various items). Would be interesting to see the results on a dataset with more economic values (at first glance this looks like 17 auth-correlated items and Lower Taxes).
November 1, 2025 at 2:37 PM
British Election Study 1997 asks more or less the same question to the same respondents - do you like the Conservative Party? - on a 5pt scale and an 11pt scale ...

... and the correlation of the results is only .77.

9 point "Strongly Against" them ... who *also rated them 10/10 for liking them!*.
October 31, 2025 at 10:29 PM
Reposted by Marios Richards
A majority of voters, and a plurality of white voters, think that Reform is a racist party with racist policies.
October 28, 2025 at 2:03 PM
Good to see that Silicon Valley is following Neon Genesis Evangelion both in content and logical coherence.
October 28, 2025 at 1:45 PM
I've come up with - yet another - plot. This time combining mini pie charts and the political compass plot.

Each pie chart reflects how voters have shifted preference from their 2024GE Labour vote to their vote intention in May 2025 for the value subgroup.
October 27, 2025 at 4:36 PM
I love("") that you can just read the timeline and watch the guy 'politically age' like it's a sped up nature scene.

Like watching someone segue smoothly "Haha, it almost seems like my belt is shrinking!" to "My belt really is shrinking each year":

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_S...
October 25, 2025 at 4:13 PM
I may have buried the lede - here's a toy model where you can manually change party position *and see how moving towards another party can(!) reduce rather than increase* your voteshare.

There's nothing clever happening under the hood (no salience/legitimacy mechanics) just a dumb spatial model.
Here is the - distinctly alpha version - Interactive Political Compass Dominance Map:

py.cafe/app/MariosRi...

Ever wanted to know what would happen if a party shifted position/changed perceived competence? Now you can!
PyCafe - Panel - Interactive Political Compass Dominance Map
Create & Share Streamlit, Dash and Python Apps Online.
py.cafe
October 24, 2025 at 9:49 AM
Here is the - distinctly alpha version - Interactive Political Compass Dominance Map:

py.cafe/app/MariosRi...

Ever wanted to know what would happen if a party shifted position/changed perceived competence? Now you can!
PyCafe - Panel - Interactive Political Compass Dominance Map
Create & Share Streamlit, Dash and Python Apps Online.
py.cafe
October 24, 2025 at 9:34 AM
A policy *supported by a smaller % of the population* than it would seek to deport!
Stephen Bush on the extraordinary draft legislation which Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp, Matt Vickers, Katie Lam and backbench colleagues have proposed in parliament

It is a proposal that would seek to deport around 5% of the resident population, including over a quarter of a million with ILR
October 23, 2025 at 11:26 AM
What are we supposed to do, Grandad ... "Build" "Houses" in any of the parts of the undeveloped parts of the UK?

No - we must conserve what is essential to Hungary.
October 22, 2025 at 12:18 PM
Great post, but it doesn't go too far enough.

I mean, isn't this the perfect time to really make a pitch for the HANG THE PAEDOS, SAVE THE NHS vote?
🚨NEW BLOGPOST🚨

Since the government can't seem to see it, I explain how and why a simple act of Parliament can bring the Andrew affair to the end - and why they should do it.

joxleywrites.substack.com/p/parliament...
October 21, 2025 at 8:28 PM
Reposted by Marios Richards
When we analyzed news coverage, we found the main driver to be intra-party divisions within the center-right CDU, where candidates were vying for party leadership.
While the UN compact & far-right agitation against it certainly warranted coverage, the issue became disproportionately amplified.
July 14, 2025 at 8:24 AM
October 19, 2025 at 10:10 PM
Reposted by Marios Richards
Your regular reminder that scrapping ILR for people who have come here and played by the rules, which is what Lam proposes here, is a position supported by 3% of the public
Sunday Times interview Tory "rising star" Katie Lam

She is clear she wants lots of legal migrants to be told to "go home" so as "to leave a mostly but not entirely culturally coherent group of people"

(The interviewer suggests she is scrapping ILR or stripping people of it)
October 19, 2025 at 7:30 AM
@dylandifford.bsky.social @ewanhoyle.bsky.social

I've had a look at the (mean) respondent-level gaps between party Like and PTV evaluations over time

~3 clusters

(1) Parties of Govt (Lab/Con/SNP) … & Reform in 2025
(2) 3rd Parties (LD/PC/UKIP/Reform until 2025)
(3) Green Party
October 15, 2025 at 9:04 AM
One of the reasons I'm skeptical about the "Lump Of Taboo" concept - that you can only invoke a taboo a finite amount so many times before it 'runs out' - is that it doesn't seem to apply to any taboos in history.
Sinatra was such a fox
Frank Sinatra on what it means to be an American in 1945
October 14, 2025 at 1:26 PM