If you can't see how that attitude is horrendously dismissive then you're no ally whatsoever.

... any way comparable is exactly why you're talking over people. You're taking the concerns of trans people, acting as if they're as hysterical as the people making crap up about him in the press, and then using a terrible comparison to lessen the severity of said concerns.

Is an incredibly dismissive attitude, and one that stems from your completely and utterly asinine assertion that him sharing the odd stage with people he didn't really know and him both becoming politically entangled with, and completely unwilling to call out the bigotry of said people are in...

I'm not going to repeat myself, I pointed out why your comparison was faulty, your dismissiveness and talking over people is a part of that same web. Suggesting that people criticising him for being cosy with transphobes are comparable to those who were hyperbolically calling him a terrorist

An on foot explore of the abandoned pier head at Herne Bay (Kent, UK) #urbex #abandoned #photography

As a side note, you should quit Chorus and get a less lame and pathetic job.

Not that you need just one issue, given that Newsom also has a fetish for destroying the possessions of the homeless, sucking up to bigots like Charlie Kirk, and plenty of other horrible right wing posturing.

Perhaps a good start would be listening to people's concerns instead of doing the old "I'm a white dude and I'm going to talk over you" bit. That said, you could just accept the fact that you used faulty logic to defend your point as opposed to doubling down and beating your chest.

Yeah, and nothing you've said addressed it. Just the same old waffle about how we should ignore the fact that the party is owned by bigots and landlords and accept having our rights decided by committee.

These people aren't just randos that he's shared a stage with, they have senior positions and controlling stakes in the company.

Boating in Herne Bay! (An Intex Excursion 5 with a 55lb trolling motor)

There goes the lie about supporting disabled people into work. Labour just want to harm us to save the government money.

Do as I say, not as I do. The rule with Starmer's Labour.

A party whose politicians who actively break a filibuster to help a cruel and hateful bill through are in no way "good". This is just another case of "this doesn't affect me as a straight, white dude so please shut the fuck up and vote how I demand".

Another group of "centrist" politicians that will never work out why the left despise them.

Plus, it's worth noting that the supreme court magically reversed course to prevent people who were ripped off by banks mis-selling loans claiming their money back after Reeves threatened to change the law. They're all part of the same circle jerk despite the feigned independence.

Labour have very much been creating the climate to strip the trans community of their human rights since getting elected, they're very much to blame for all this.

AI generated rats are definitely the scariest.

Seriously? Stonewall aren't doing anything to stand up for the trans community.

Gotta say a "weirdo" is more appealing to me than a bunch of Trump and Putin loving Nazis.

I think they just want us to forget all this shit happened, and tbh I'm happy to oblige. It's much more important to me that the transphobes and landlords haven't been told to fuck off.

I think a temporary end to the killing is a good thing, but anyone that isn't a right wing idiot that has suddenly decided to trust Netenyahu and Trump needs their head examined.

Or they just want to make the country even more hateful and backwards.

Or kid starver for that matter...