Reposted by beans
Dinge, die eigentlich selbstverständlich sein sollten:
Diese Petition beim Bundestag fordert, dass es keine Rosa Listen von trans Menschen geben darf, welche transfeindliche Politiker und Parteien nutzen könnten, um trans Menschen zu finden und zu verfolgen
epetitionen.bundestag.de/petitionen/_...
Diese Petition beim Bundestag fordert, dass es keine Rosa Listen von trans Menschen geben darf, welche transfeindliche Politiker und Parteien nutzen könnten, um trans Menschen zu finden und zu verfolgen
epetitionen.bundestag.de/petitionen/_...
Petitionen: Verwendung von Cookies nicht aktiviert
epetitionen.bundestag.de
December 4, 2025 at 10:51 AM
Dinge, die eigentlich selbstverständlich sein sollten:
Diese Petition beim Bundestag fordert, dass es keine Rosa Listen von trans Menschen geben darf, welche transfeindliche Politiker und Parteien nutzen könnten, um trans Menschen zu finden und zu verfolgen
epetitionen.bundestag.de/petitionen/_...
Diese Petition beim Bundestag fordert, dass es keine Rosa Listen von trans Menschen geben darf, welche transfeindliche Politiker und Parteien nutzen könnten, um trans Menschen zu finden und zu verfolgen
epetitionen.bundestag.de/petitionen/_...
Reposted by beans
This happens because transphobia is an institutional imperative and never considered a conflict of interest, or an impediment to providing trans people with care.
The status quo of transition care is trans people subjecting ourselves to the whims of bigots who want to humiliate and exploit us.
The status quo of transition care is trans people subjecting ourselves to the whims of bigots who want to humiliate and exploit us.
Disgustingly, the published 'research" in question was used to inflame discourse about a "rapid increase" in trans youth, harming the patients whose data it used!
bsky.app/profile/anin...
bsky.app/profile/anin...
Om du hører noen si at det har vært «skarp økning» i antallet ungdommer som søker kjønnsbekreftende behandling er det denne ulovlige forskningen de viser til. Vi kritiserte den i tidsskriftet i januar: link.springer.com/article/10.1...
October 8, 2025 at 7:08 AM
This happens because transphobia is an institutional imperative and never considered a conflict of interest, or an impediment to providing trans people with care.
The status quo of transition care is trans people subjecting ourselves to the whims of bigots who want to humiliate and exploit us.
The status quo of transition care is trans people subjecting ourselves to the whims of bigots who want to humiliate and exploit us.
Reposted by beans
charlie kirk died for what he believed in. in a very literal sense: he believed in a world where gun deaths are inevitable and the solution to problems is violence. he excused his own death years before it happened. and if anyone else had been killed he'd already be weaponizing and relativizing it.
September 11, 2025 at 1:35 PM
charlie kirk died for what he believed in. in a very literal sense: he believed in a world where gun deaths are inevitable and the solution to problems is violence. he excused his own death years before it happened. and if anyone else had been killed he'd already be weaponizing and relativizing it.
Reposted by beans
hört auf mir diesen fascho in die time line spülen und protect trans kids
September 11, 2025 at 1:36 PM
hört auf mir diesen fascho in die time line spülen und protect trans kids
Reposted by beans
der tod eines faschisten trägt nicht mehr zu spaltung eines landes bei als sein leben
September 12, 2025 at 9:57 AM
der tod eines faschisten trägt nicht mehr zu spaltung eines landes bei als sein leben
Reposted by beans
I wish more cis people understood that this, too, is actually torturous.
Yeah you, trans person, you stay frozen as a child whilst your peers age around you and when you get to 18 maybe then you get to start trying to catch up. Because we, cis people, find your existence objectionable.
Yeah you, trans person, you stay frozen as a child whilst your peers age around you and when you get to 18 maybe then you get to start trying to catch up. Because we, cis people, find your existence objectionable.
I wonder how far a Dem politician could get with “I will reduce gender confirming surgery in children to almost zero, I will instead require that doctors analyze these children’s mental health and offer safe and commonly prescribed medications that will help postpone decisions until they’re older”
August 21, 2025 at 10:49 AM
I wish more cis people understood that this, too, is actually torturous.
Yeah you, trans person, you stay frozen as a child whilst your peers age around you and when you get to 18 maybe then you get to start trying to catch up. Because we, cis people, find your existence objectionable.
Yeah you, trans person, you stay frozen as a child whilst your peers age around you and when you get to 18 maybe then you get to start trying to catch up. Because we, cis people, find your existence objectionable.
Reposted by beans
Andrea Dworkin pointed out the irony of being told men are women's natural protectors, when they are the biggest danger. Whether women are put on a pedestal or a pyre, it's the same old patriarchy. Men & women are not different species, men are not naturally superior to women.
June 26, 2025 at 9:45 AM
Andrea Dworkin pointed out the irony of being told men are women's natural protectors, when they are the biggest danger. Whether women are put on a pedestal or a pyre, it's the same old patriarchy. Men & women are not different species, men are not naturally superior to women.
Reposted by beans
Fashion tip: have a wardrobe with more colours than just black so you can fucking find your clothes in there
(NOTE: this user failed to heed her own advice)
(NOTE: this user failed to heed her own advice)
June 21, 2025 at 6:22 PM
Fashion tip: have a wardrobe with more colours than just black so you can fucking find your clothes in there
(NOTE: this user failed to heed her own advice)
(NOTE: this user failed to heed her own advice)
Reposted by beans
Does anyone remember a few years ago The Times had a headline something like "636 trans women in UK prisons for sex crimes" and then it turned out they had just assumed all women in prison for rape were trans based upon nothing, and then they quietly retracted it? Can anyone remember the article?
June 14, 2025 at 10:27 AM
Does anyone remember a few years ago The Times had a headline something like "636 trans women in UK prisons for sex crimes" and then it turned out they had just assumed all women in prison for rape were trans based upon nothing, and then they quietly retracted it? Can anyone remember the article?
Reposted by beans
Looking across the papers today, anti-trans rights commentators and politicians also seem to be the ones opposing making abortion legal. It shouldn’t be a shock to anyone - they’re against bodily autonomy. For everyone.
June 14, 2025 at 12:18 PM
Looking across the papers today, anti-trans rights commentators and politicians also seem to be the ones opposing making abortion legal. It shouldn’t be a shock to anyone - they’re against bodily autonomy. For everyone.
Reposted by beans
Sounds absurd to assert that a person's desire to know what my genitals are is more important than my desire to keep my genitals private but here we are.
June 13, 2025 at 9:29 AM
Sounds absurd to assert that a person's desire to know what my genitals are is more important than my desire to keep my genitals private but here we are.
Reposted by beans
I think there's other stuff about wanting certain bodies available for sexual exploitation and child bearing/raising, but the fundamental fear trans people represent is that manhood isn't special, anyone can have it, and not everybody wants it.
Trans men represent the "anyone can have it" part.
Trans men represent the "anyone can have it" part.
I think a huge error that's often made in analysis of trans men's political situation is framing it as "the intersection of hatred towards trans people and hatred towards men" rather than "the trans version of hatred towards potential usurpers of hegemonic manhood"
June 3, 2025 at 10:40 AM
I think there's other stuff about wanting certain bodies available for sexual exploitation and child bearing/raising, but the fundamental fear trans people represent is that manhood isn't special, anyone can have it, and not everybody wants it.
Trans men represent the "anyone can have it" part.
Trans men represent the "anyone can have it" part.
Reposted by beans
It reminds me so much of what the GOP did with gay marriage 20+ years ago—and how the media-consultant complex responded at the time.
May 29, 2025 at 8:09 PM
It reminds me so much of what the GOP did with gay marriage 20+ years ago—and how the media-consultant complex responded at the time.
Reposted by beans
The whole 'Grok is a boer now' thing is very funny, but it also really exposes how every 'AI tool' isn't just passively biased from training data, but actively designed to shape your worldview according to the interests of the billionaires who made them.
May 15, 2025 at 5:49 PM
The whole 'Grok is a boer now' thing is very funny, but it also really exposes how every 'AI tool' isn't just passively biased from training data, but actively designed to shape your worldview according to the interests of the billionaires who made them.
Reposted by beans
It's super cool that men would rather destroy the ecosystem than be perceived as effeminate in any way!
“Our results suggest that traditional gender norms, particularly those linking masculinity with red meat consumption and car use, play a significant role in shaping individual carbon footprints."
Car use and meat consumption drive emissions gender gap, research suggests
- French study of 15,000 people shows men emit 26% more pollution due to eating red meat and driving more
#climatecrisis
www.theguardian.com/environment/...
- French study of 15,000 people shows men emit 26% more pollution due to eating red meat and driving more
#climatecrisis
www.theguardian.com/environment/...
May 14, 2025 at 6:56 PM
It's super cool that men would rather destroy the ecosystem than be perceived as effeminate in any way!
Reposted by beans
Am 6. Mai 1933 wurde das Institut für Sexualwissenschaft Berlin überfallen und geplündert, viele einzigartige Schriften wurden wenige Tage später bei der Bücherverbrennung vernichtet.
Es war der Verlust eines queeren Leuchtturms und die Zerstörung queeren Wissen auf mannigfaltigen Ebenen.
Es war der Verlust eines queeren Leuchtturms und die Zerstörung queeren Wissen auf mannigfaltigen Ebenen.
May 6, 2025 at 5:01 PM
Am 6. Mai 1933 wurde das Institut für Sexualwissenschaft Berlin überfallen und geplündert, viele einzigartige Schriften wurden wenige Tage später bei der Bücherverbrennung vernichtet.
Es war der Verlust eines queeren Leuchtturms und die Zerstörung queeren Wissen auf mannigfaltigen Ebenen.
Es war der Verlust eines queeren Leuchtturms und die Zerstörung queeren Wissen auf mannigfaltigen Ebenen.
Reposted by beans
AfD jetzt auch offiziell „gesichert rechtsextremistisch“. Eine Entscheidung, die Folgen haben muss, insbesondere für den ÖRR. Eine „Gleichbehandlung“ von Rechtsextremisten verstößt gegen den Programmauftrag. Verfassungsfeinden darf keine Bühne gegeben werden. Nicht in Talks, nicht in der Tagesschau.
May 2, 2025 at 8:50 AM
AfD jetzt auch offiziell „gesichert rechtsextremistisch“. Eine Entscheidung, die Folgen haben muss, insbesondere für den ÖRR. Eine „Gleichbehandlung“ von Rechtsextremisten verstößt gegen den Programmauftrag. Verfassungsfeinden darf keine Bühne gegeben werden. Nicht in Talks, nicht in der Tagesschau.
Reposted by beans
regardless of today’s outcome, it is morally indefensible to have a court ruling on something that affects a population, using evidence and findings that did not consult a single member of that population.
April 16, 2025 at 8:46 AM
regardless of today’s outcome, it is morally indefensible to have a court ruling on something that affects a population, using evidence and findings that did not consult a single member of that population.
Reposted by beans
I think what is more fascinating that based on this bonkers definition if I believe that a lesbian’s partner is a trans woman she’s no longer lesbian and therefore not eligible for protections based on sexual orientation
April 16, 2025 at 4:50 PM
I think what is more fascinating that based on this bonkers definition if I believe that a lesbian’s partner is a trans woman she’s no longer lesbian and therefore not eligible for protections based on sexual orientation
Reposted by beans
When the US began to strip trans people of rights, revert documentation, move trans women to men's prisons, censor research, and move towards healthcare bans, most cis people posted things like "the government can't tell you who you are!"
They think our biggest issue is validation, not actual harm.
They think our biggest issue is validation, not actual harm.
April 13, 2025 at 8:40 AM
When the US began to strip trans people of rights, revert documentation, move trans women to men's prisons, censor research, and move towards healthcare bans, most cis people posted things like "the government can't tell you who you are!"
They think our biggest issue is validation, not actual harm.
They think our biggest issue is validation, not actual harm.
Reposted by beans
Yet another example of transphobia rooted in projected fetishization.
Trans women tell study they rely on sex work for survival. Study concludes, nah, they’re all getting off on it. They published a literal fantasy.
Researchers need to stop dressing up their sexual preoccupations as science.
Trans women tell study they rely on sex work for survival. Study concludes, nah, they’re all getting off on it. They published a literal fantasy.
Researchers need to stop dressing up their sexual preoccupations as science.
I want you all to look at this conclusion in the fucking eye, next to the actual things said by the trans women interviewed.
From the repeated testimony that trans women have no family support, are unhirable, and need to both survive and pay for transition care, the researchers concluded THIS.
From the repeated testimony that trans women have no family support, are unhirable, and need to both survive and pay for transition care, the researchers concluded THIS.
April 8, 2025 at 10:39 AM
Yet another example of transphobia rooted in projected fetishization.
Trans women tell study they rely on sex work for survival. Study concludes, nah, they’re all getting off on it. They published a literal fantasy.
Researchers need to stop dressing up their sexual preoccupations as science.
Trans women tell study they rely on sex work for survival. Study concludes, nah, they’re all getting off on it. They published a literal fantasy.
Researchers need to stop dressing up their sexual preoccupations as science.
Reposted by beans
The whole "if sex and gender are different then why do you need to change your sex characteristics to affirm your gender" thing is like the "if humans came from monkeys then why are there still monkeys" of anti-trans politics
April 4, 2025 at 10:00 AM
The whole "if sex and gender are different then why do you need to change your sex characteristics to affirm your gender" thing is like the "if humans came from monkeys then why are there still monkeys" of anti-trans politics