Jennifer Romig
@jennifermromig.bsky.social
3.8K followers 1.5K following 1.7K posts
Veteran legal writing professor; still positive, eclectic, and pragmatic
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
jennifermromig.bsky.social
Whatever you choose to do, be good at it. This guy gets it
razzball.bsky.social
Fan wearing a "Dump Here" jersey with 61 caught Cal's HR 🔥

Immediately changes into an identical 62 jersey
Described in skeet Described in skeet
jennifermromig.bsky.social
I went last Saturday for cheap, and I mean cheap, with good parking … it was same time as Georgia Alabama game 😂
jennifermromig.bsky.social
Glitter gel pen, quill pen, and fountain pen — meet your new partner: the AI-infused clif nottes (no affiliation with Cliff Notes) pen
anthonymoser.com
"That is, in fact, not what happened to Ophelia."
A personal gripe I have is that the first song on the album (which seems like it's meant to be the lead single), "The Fate of Ophelia," does not seem to have any understanding of Hamlet. Swift admitted in a BBC radio interview with Greg James that she "didn't really need to reread [Hamlet]. I wanted to sprinkle some references in the bridge, so like the the bridge references kind of some paraphrasing of some lines from Hamlet, so I did like do a little brushup. But I just love the idea that like, You saved me from love driving me mad, right?
'Cause that's what happened to Ophelia. Spoiler alert."
jennifermromig.bsky.social
This sounds like that town in Florida notorious for a culture and practice of everyone causing crashes to get insurance settlements
jennifermromig.bsky.social
perhaps their parent cos make more money off other revenue streams collecting and selling personal data - or expect to do so even if legal research might bring in more dollars at this time
jennifermromig.bsky.social
How does this intersect with recreational property immunity
Reposted by Jennifer Romig
internethippo.bsky.social
"We're going to create superintelligence" How about making outlook search work first. How about that
jennifermromig.bsky.social
My students are writing about NIL and you better believe this is going in next year’s version of the assignment
espnbillc.bsky.social
I … don’t know about this…
Reposted by Jennifer Romig
edsbs.bsky.social
You know Atlanta is a perfect city because someone built a building that at 7:30 am becomes a solar death ray blinding everyone southbound on the connector
Building reflecting the sun directly into traffic
Reposted by Jennifer Romig
lutzfernandez.bsky.social
Manic Pixel Girl
cjdenial.bsky.social
Can we stop calling an artificial representation of a person by a human-coded name? "She" does not exist. "She" is a reflection of someone's ingenue dreams, but "she" is pixels and code.
opinion.bloomberg.com
Tilly Norwood raises the question of who will be the first to win an Oscar for best AI in a leading role
Reposted by Jennifer Romig
sellars.bsky.social
Judge Young—who has been on the bench for as long as I have been alive—calls it the most important case he has ever considered.
This case -– perhaps the most important ever to fall within
the jurisdiction of this district court –- squarely presents the
issue whether non-citizens lawfully present here in United
States actually have the same free speech rights as the rest of
us. The Court answers this Constitutional question
unequivocally “yes, they do.” “No law” means “no law.”
Reposted by Jennifer Romig
lilymasonphd.bsky.social
I’m old enough to remember when corporations fought tooth and nail all the way to the Supreme Court to make sure the government couldn’t take their money or control how they run their businesses.
yasharali.bsky.social
BREAKING

YouTube has agreed to pay $24.5 million to settle the lawsuit brought by President Trump against the company for suspending his account.

Most of the funds will go towards the fund the president setup for the White House ballroom.

Full Story: on.wsj.com/46IT4P1
jennifermromig.bsky.social
There’s no corollary prohibition in the Bluepages though. Am I missing something? Page 7: “if an authority is organized by section or paragraph, you may cite to these subdivisions.” Does that mean they don’t purport to forbid et seq as a practice in practice?
jennifermromig.bsky.social
I had forgotten about that essay but agree with its characterization of “shockingly arbitrary“ revisions
jennifermromig.bsky.social
Is there any other example in the Bluebook where they explicitly call out an arguably common practice and say do not use x but rather use y? Huge risk in any argument that to explicitly negate an idea is to reinforce it
jennifermromig.bsky.social
Getting ready for in-depth Bluebook 22d ed class tomorrow. I knew that (citation modified) made the cut over (cleaned up). But didn’t realize till now the Bluepages affirmatively say do NOT use (cleaned up) and such parentheticals “lack[s] a definite meaning in practice.”
jennifermromig.bsky.social
Getting ready for in-depth Bluebook 22d ed class tomorrow. I knew that (citation modified) made the cut over (cleaned up). But didn’t realize till now the Bluepages affirmatively say do NOT use (cleaned up) and such parentheticals “lack[s] a definite meaning in practice.”
jennifermromig.bsky.social
while we’re making lists, sarcastically or not, the college refs at that Wake Forest - Georgia tech game deserved to be screamed at too
jennifermromig.bsky.social
Ruin a band with law:

Pet Shopkeeper’s Defense

<feel like I saw this one before but can’t find>
coreyryung.bsky.social
Ruin a band with law:

No Reasonable Doubt
mattmarcotte.bsky.social
Run a band with law:

Grand Funk Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad.
jennifermromig.bsky.social
Ruin a band with law:

The Per Cure-iam
coreyryung.bsky.social
Ruin a band with law:

No Reasonable Doubt
mattmarcotte.bsky.social
Run a band with law:

Grand Funk Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad.
jennifermromig.bsky.social
Yes that’s what happened here. And maybe in most or all of those 190 cases (!!)