www.washingtonpost.com/politics/202...
www.washingtonpost.com/politics/202...
Punitive processes make narrowly targeted programs *less* efficient and *more* costly. Because more scrutiny requires more bureaucracy.
Punitive processes also make it *less* likely that people will get aid for which they qualify. Because of the roadblocks and stigma scrutiny creates.
Yes you can! If the man is committing impeachable offenses on the regular, you’re acquiescing to a standard that raises the bar for impeachable offense to absurd levels.
Not introducing articles of impeachment is a message that Trump hasn't committed impeachable offenses.
Not quite exactly, but not too far off, and she nailed the bribes prediction
scholar.google.com/scholar_case...
Not quite exactly, but not too far off, and she nailed the bribes prediction
scholar.google.com/scholar_case...
"But what should we do when the highborn and wealthy take to crime? Indeed, if a poor man will spend a year in prison for stealing out of hunger, how high would the gallows need to be to hang the rich man who breaks the law out of greed?"
"But what should we do when the highborn and wealthy take to crime? Indeed, if a poor man will spend a year in prison for stealing out of hunger, how high would the gallows need to be to hang the rich man who breaks the law out of greed?"
And I understand that this pronouncement lands very differently when it comes from an organization that has intentionally been overhauled in order to curry favor with a jingoistic proto-fascist who says his opponents hate the country.
One of those values is simply: “We love America and make no apologies for saying so.”
Immigration is good. Multiculturalism is good. Free trade is good. Stop being embarrassed to say so.