“This represents racial discrimination, and discrimination against America’s LGBTQ community. That's what this is. I would be blind not to call it out. My duty is to call it out. And I do so.”
PLAINTIFF'S WIN!!
Judge Young rules that the NIH grant terminations at issue in these cases are illegal and therefore vacated. BOOM!
"They are of no force and effect."
"They are illegal and so are each of the terminations before this Court"
“This represents racial discrimination, and discrimination against America’s LGBTQ community. That's what this is. I would be blind not to call it out. My duty is to call it out. And I do so.”
Directives to terminate grants came largely from outside NIH, including by officials at HHS (Rachel Riley) and Doge (Brad Smith).
More evidence showing that NIH officials did not make a reasoned, considered decision before terminating each grant.
"This rapid response bridge funding opportunity is for scholars and teams whose grants have recently been cancelled by NSF."
"This rapid response bridge funding opportunity is for scholars and teams whose grants have recently been cancelled by NSF."
We think this is illegal but if the courts say you can do this then we are going to rip the guts out of the entire conservative movement. No more Heritage, FedSoc, etc. All of them lose their tax exempt status.
We think this is illegal but if the courts say you can do this then we are going to rip the guts out of the entire conservative movement. No more Heritage, FedSoc, etc. All of them lose their tax exempt status.
www.harvard.edu/research-fun...
www.harvard.edu/research-fun...
www.harvard.edu/research-fun...
www.harvard.edu/research-fun...
Really important piece to share widely. Too many Americans don’t know how severe a threat this Administration poses to our scientific infrastructure, global leadership, and health security
The financial backers could spend as much as $200,000 on a "sponsorship" and gain exclusive access to the Oval Office.
Is there anything that's not for sale under Trump?
"Research programs based on gender identity are often unscientific, have little identifiable return on investment, and do nothing to enhance the health of many Americans. Many such studies ignore, rather than seriously examine, biological realities."
"Research programs based on gender identity are often unscientific, have little identifiable return on investment, and do nothing to enhance the health of many Americans. Many such studies ignore, rather than seriously examine, biological realities."
Sex as a Biological Variable tab
"Historic document published prior to January 20, 2025"
It looks like we are headed back to the good old days when women were consider to be small men for the purposes of research...
(also, this is literally less than half of the Nazi shit they're currently pulling)
(also, this is literally less than half of the Nazi shit they're currently pulling)