Scholar

Damien Bol

H-index: 17
Political science 60%
Economics 14%
annerasmussen.bsky.social
🚨 New paper in @thejop.bsky.social

Why do politicians often misperceive what citizens' policy positions are?

@simonotjes.bsky.social and I study ~10,000 estimates of public opinion by politicians in Denmark & the Netherlands to uncover the sources of these (mis)perceptions

Thread 🧵1/10
sumitra.bsky.social
🚨 new paper out w/ @simonchauchard.bsky.social in BJPS @bjpols.bsky.social on the link between misinformation and religiosity- does religious belief cause people to endorse more misinformation? And if so, what can we do about it?

thread below ⬇️
plvezina.bsky.social
New WP thread! 🤓 Vietnam's solar panel exports boomed between 2018 and 2022. With my PhD student Meng Yu Ngov, Trang Thu Tran, and Gaurav Nayyar we look at how this industry success can be attributed to attracting FDI and importing parts and components, as well to Chinese subsidy spillovers.👇
damienbol.bsky.social
Thanks for the SO. We tried estimate the effect of having a 4th candidate (as a separate RDD), but there were too few treated districts. That said, as France is becoming increasingly fragmented, there will be more and more data points
jack-bailey.co.uk
A recent paper by @damienbol.bsky.social and @riaivandic.bsky.social provides some inspiration: in France's two-round system, the top two parties go through to the second round, but so do any others that pass a given threshold (currently receiving votes from 12.5% of registered voters)
Ria Ivandic (@riaivandic.bsky.social)
AP @ University of Zagreb. Associate at @cep-lse.bsky.social. Working on research in domestic abuse, gender economics and political economy. She/her. https://sites.google.com/site/riaivandic/
riaivandic.bsky.social

Reposted by: Damien Bol

jack-bailey.co.uk
A recent paper by @damienbol.bsky.social and @riaivandic.bsky.social provides some inspiration: in France's two-round system, the top two parties go through to the second round, but so do any others that pass a given threshold (currently receiving votes from 12.5% of registered voters)
Ria Ivandic (@riaivandic.bsky.social)
AP @ University of Zagreb. Associate at @cep-lse.bsky.social. Working on research in domestic abuse, gender economics and political economy. She/her. https://sites.google.com/site/riaivandic/
riaivandic.bsky.social
damienbol.bsky.social
Et ça s’insère dans le débat général sur : est-ce que chaque recherche (entendu chaque papier) doit proposer une nouvelle théorie et la tester? C’est intenable compte tenu des attentes en termes de publications et pas souhaitable car les theories doivent être testées et restées pour être validées
luanarusso.bsky.social
📣 We are hiring! 👇

This PhD position is part of a research project that examines how growing income inequality can reshape the way democracy functions by influencing both political discourse and public opinion.

More info here:
www.academictransfer.com/en/jobs/3542...
damienbol.bsky.social
Il y aurait probablement moins de vote utile avec le jugement majoritaire ou le vote par approbation. Mais il faudrait les voir à l’œuvre dans le temps.

Dans les pays utilisant du ranked-choice par exemple, les partis finissent souvent par donner des consignes de vote stratégique à leur supporters.
damienbol.bsky.social
Le vote stratégique existe donc bel et bien en 🇫🇷, même au 1er tour. Cela soulève la question démocratique des inégalités de représentation.

A lire ici : shs.cairn.info/revue-revue-...

@cevipof.bsky.social @edr-sciencespo.bsky.social

Fin/
Le vote stratégique dans une France multipolarisée
Le cas des élections législatives de 2024
shs.cairn.info
damienbol.bsky.social
Sans surprise, les électeurs stratégiques restent proche de leur parti préféré (exemple : Reconquête ➡️ RN)

Fait marquant : au 1er tour, le vote stratégique est surtout pratiqué par les électeurs plus âgés et politisés. Cela contribue donc à un déficit de représentation pour les autres.

4/
damienbol.bsky.social
Avec les enquêtes CEVIPOF, nous quantifions le vote stratégique aux législatives 2024.

👉 Il y en a plus au 2nd tour, quand le choix est restreint.
👉 Mais même au 1er tour, 7-8% ont voté utile plutôt que pour leur parti préféré.

C’est comparable aux scrutins à un tour britanniques ou canadiens.

3/
damienbol.bsky.social
On entend souvent que le scrutin à deux tours rend le vote stratégique anodin en 🇫🇷 : on vote avec son cœur au 1er tour, avec sa tête au 2nd. Mais cela suppose seulement 2 grands blocs. Ce n’est plus le cas. Résultat : même au 1er tour, voter utile est crucial (cf. élimination de Jospin en 2002).

2/
damienbol.bsky.social
Très heureux de voir notre article publié dans la Revue Française de Science Politique, en collaboration avec @jfdaoust.bsky.social, toujours aussi brillant ✨

Après avoir beaucoup travaillé sur le vote utile, aussi appelé vote stratégique, nous testons nos méthodes sur le cas français.

1/
daviddarmofal.bsky.social
#polisky #psjminfo We're hiring for three faculty positions in the Department of Political Science at the University of South Carolina. All 3 positions are part of an internal departmental cluster hire in the thematic area of Problems of Democracy. A 🧵on the positions. 1/
suthank.bsky.social
Join our team! 🚨

We are hiring 2 postdocs for the new Advertising Democracy project at Aarhus University.

We are looking for researchers who are passionate about advertisements & citizens’ democratic values in Western democracies.

Feel free to share!👇🏾

bss.au.dk/en/about-aar...
Postdoctoral positions in Political Science at Aarhus University – Advertising Democracy - Vacancy at Aarhus University
Vacancy at Department of Political Science, Aarhus University
bss.au.dk
damienbol.bsky.social
Kicking off the @sciencespo.bsky.social @ox.ac.uk @iast.fr workshop in political economy. This year at beautiful Nuffield College in Oxford

Reposted by: Damien Bol

cpsjournal.bsky.social
And (5) "Who are the Cosmopolitans? How Perceived Social Sorting and Social Identities Relate to European and National Identities" by Ronja Sczepanski @ronjasczepanski.bsky.social

journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10....
damienbol.bsky.social
We continue with Oliver Rittmann on electoral reform in Germany
damienbol.bsky.social
We’ve water and AC in the room. And great presentations ! Do join us
damienbol.bsky.social
🚨EPSA alert 🚨 @priera.bsky.social and I are organizing a pre-EPSA conference on political institutions on Wed 25 June. Same location as EPSA - Room 0.A.04. We've an amazing line-up of fantastic junior colleagues matched with more senior discussants. All EPSA attendees can attend and are welcome
damienbol.bsky.social
Honored to have been invited to my former work place to participate in stimulating discussions about democratic innovations. The basis of my intervention was our OA paper on public opinion about deliberative democracy (with @jbpilet.bsky.social). ejpr.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
damienbol.bsky.social
Filip is a gem. A rare combination of intellectual sharpness and personal sweetness. Political science is lucky to have him
filipkostelka.bsky.social
Had a great time at Sciences Po, discussing @damienbol.bsky.social's impressive habilitation research, and now heading to Barcelona for a presentation at @transdem.bsky.social, equipped with an excellent read by @celytadeas.bsky.social

Reposted by: Damien Bol

filipkostelka.bsky.social
Had a great time at Sciences Po, discussing @damienbol.bsky.social's impressive habilitation research, and now heading to Barcelona for a presentation at @transdem.bsky.social, equipped with an excellent read by @celytadeas.bsky.social
damienbol.bsky.social
Big thank you to @vinarceneaux.bsky.social for supervising this, and @filipkostelka.bsky.social @rdassonneville.bsky.social @sofiavasilopoulou.bsky.social @nicolassauger.bsky.social and Livia Schubiger for sitting in my jury. Thanks for making this a pleasant experience. @cevipof.bsky.social

References

Fields & subjects

Updated 1m