Writer, anthropologist, live wire. Co-Founder of CostsofWar.org. Author of Homefront, Reading National Geographic, Carjacked, Schooled.
Catherine A. Lutz is an American anthropologist who is the Thomas J. Watson Jr. Family Professor of Anthropology and International Studies at Brown University. She is also a research professor at the Watson Institute where she serves as a director of the Costs of War Project, which attempts to calculate the financial costs of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. .. more
Reposted by Catherine Lutz
Reposted by Timothy Snyder, Anna O. Law, Richard S.J. Tol , and 17 more Timothy Snyder, Anna O. Law, Richard S.J. Tol, Will Jennings, Tom Clark, Michelle Everson, Michael Kevane, Laurent Pech, Catherine Lutz, Alan Richardson, David R. Miller, Michael H. Whitworth, Anne Norton, Richard M. Carpiano, Blair Fix, Meredith Farkas, Olúfẹ́mi Táíwò, Nathan P. Kalmoe, S. Laurel Weldon, Timothy D. McBride
Reposted by Catherine Lutz
Reposted by Catherine Lutz
Reposted by Catherine Lutz
Reposted by Catherine Lutz
Reposted by Catherine Lutz
![Argument: “AI won’t replace teachers, but it will save them time and improve their effectiveness.”
Adding edtech does not necessarily save teachers time. A recent study found that learning management systems sold to schools over the past decade-plus as time-savers aren’t delivering on making teaching easier. Instead, they found this tech (e.g. Google Classroom, Canvas) is often burdensome and contributes to burnout. As one teacher put it, it “just adds layers to tasks.”
“Extra time” is rarely returned to teachers. AI proponents argue that if teachers use AI tools to grade, prepare lessons, or differentiate materials, they’ll have more time to work with students. But there are always new initiatives, duties, or committee assignments—the unpaid work districts rely on—to suck up that time. In a culture of austerity and with a USDOE that is cutting spending, teachers are likely to be assigned more students. When class sizes grow, students get less attention, and positions can be cut.
AI can’t replace what teachers do, but that doesn’t mean teachers won’t be replaced. Schools are already doing it: Arizona approved a charter school in which students spend mornings working with AI and the role of teacher is reduced to “guide.” Ed tech expert Neil Selwyn argues those in “industry and policy circles…hostile to the idea of expensively trained expert professional educators who have [tenure], pension rights and union protection… [welcome] AI replacement as a way of undermining the status of the professional teacher.”
Tech firms have been selling schools on untested products for years. Technophilia has led to students being on screens for hours in school each week even when their phones are banned. Writer Jess Grose explains, “Companies never had to prove that devices or software, broadly speaking, helped students learn before those devices had wormed their way into America’s public schools.” AI products appear to be no different.
Efficiency is not effectiveness. “Speed a…](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:jpjyorpadryoa6vnwwsnnyq5/bafkreigrcdai56b6rnuqchhubqnmxpd4bj5j2dxecaejnr3l4pxwbcej2i@jpeg)
Reposted by Catherine Lutz
Reposted by Catherine Lutz
Reposted by Catherine Lutz
Reposted by Catherine Lutz
Reposted by Catherine Lutz
Reposted by Catherine Lutz
Reposted by Catherine Lutz
Reposted by Catherine Lutz
Reposted by Catherine Lutz, Susan Patrick
