men's werehouse
@elizaeffect.bsky.social
720 followers
1.2K following
5.9K posts
Developer | cat fan | category error | serial nanocelebrity-by-marriage | married to @hollowinvective.bsky.social | foster parent | Cleveland diehard
Posts
Media
Videos
Starter Packs
Reposted by men's werehouse
Vibe shift in the culture towards earnestness
Reposted by men's werehouse
Reposted by men's werehouse
Trump: "I'm allowed as you know as president, like 50% of the presidents have used the Insurrection Act. Everybody agrees you're allowed to use that and there is no more court cases, there is no more anything. We're trying to do it in a nicer manner, but we can always use the Insurrection Act."
Reposted by men's werehouse
Reposted by men's werehouse
Reminder: We spent YEARS reading thousands and thousands of articles on the Tea Party and how it was a true expression of the American people's will, and it never mounted anything nearly as big as Saturday's No Kings rallies. [1/3]
Reposted by men's werehouse
This person is paying OpenAI two hundred dollars a month to have a chatbot gaslight them about making an excel spreadsheet
Reposted by men's werehouse
Reposted by men's werehouse
Reposted by men's werehouse
👻Wereman 🐺🎃
@spookarties.bsky.social
· Dec 1
Reposted by men's werehouse
Reposted by men's werehouse
Reposted by men's werehouse
Reposted by men's werehouse
Reposted by men's werehouse
Reposted by men's werehouse
Reposted by men's werehouse
My best friend was able to leave her abusive husband because the ACA made it possible for her to still get health insurance
Reposted by men's werehouse
The comparison to the Tea Party is right -- not just in terms of the size of the protests, but the complaints they're making.
The Tea Party began when a CNBC reporter and a crowd of bond traders threw a tantrum about Obama continuing the post-crash bailouts that Bush began. That was their "tyranny"
The Tea Party began when a CNBC reporter and a crowd of bond traders threw a tantrum about Obama continuing the post-crash bailouts that Bush began. That was their "tyranny"
Remember April 2009 when about 250,000 people took to America’s streets in Tea Party rallies and the media was like “oh man, the Dems are in trouble?” Approximately 28X as many people took to the streets to protest Trump yesterday. Didn’t even make the NYT front page.
Reposted by men's werehouse
Reposted by men's werehouse
really can't emphasise how awful it is to see "it doesn't matter it's telling the right story" as a response to "that thing you shared about <current moment> is AI"
Reposted by men's werehouse
Reposted by men's werehouse
The largest mass protests by number of participants in US history happened yesterday and the only mention on the front page of the NYT is Jamelle Bouie's opinion column: no diner-diving for sentiments of the unheard masses, no coverage of the Trump video, no sense for what it says about the moment.
Reposted by men's werehouse
Reposted by men's werehouse
In April of 2009 I observed the Tea Party rally in Salem. As this front page story says, there were a couple hundred people there. This past weekend in Salem there were roughly 2-3000 people at the Hands Off rally. Yet the Tea Party coverage seemed to take that event far more seriously.