I don't think we should drop the environmental angle.
First: when we're talking about AI, it's a mistake to lead with the environmental impact.
It's a bad frame, bc it implies that if the numbers were different, it would be ok. But it wouldn't.
i went long on the conversation around AI and water, and how it's actually about what we want resources to be used for:
I don't think we should drop the environmental angle.
56,000 wealthy individuals have more than roughly 4 billion people.
Read that back.
56,000 wealthy individuals have more than roughly 4 billion people.
Read that back.
ChatGPT: No, humans don't take a shit. Their waste is recycled through an internal flux capacitor.
Corporations: Amazing! Here's a billion dollars!
ChatGPT: No, humans don't take a shit. Their waste is recycled through an internal flux capacitor.
Corporations: Amazing! Here's a billion dollars!
Ancient Circuit Judge Delivers Crystal Clear 100 Page Rebuke To Trumpist Overreach
or
In Unsigned Shadow Docket Decision, 6-3 Majority Declares Trump Can Hunt People For Sport
Ancient Circuit Judge Delivers Crystal Clear 100 Page Rebuke To Trumpist Overreach
or
In Unsigned Shadow Docket Decision, 6-3 Majority Declares Trump Can Hunt People For Sport
It's not even just about people blindly trusting what ChatGPT tells them. LLMs are poisoning the entire information ecosystem. You can't even necessarily trust that the citations in a published paper are real (or a search engine's descriptions of them).
It's not even just about people blindly trusting what ChatGPT tells them. LLMs are poisoning the entire information ecosystem. You can't even necessarily trust that the citations in a published paper are real (or a search engine's descriptions of them).
Also, I've been beating this drum about the danger to the information ecosystem for six and half years now. A few links below:
It's not even just about people blindly trusting what ChatGPT tells them. LLMs are poisoning the entire information ecosystem. You can't even necessarily trust that the citations in a published paper are real (or a search engine's descriptions of them).
Also, I've been beating this drum about the danger to the information ecosystem for six and half years now. A few links below:
really important thread ⬇️
really important thread ⬇️
CEO-to-worker pay ratio in 1990: 75-1
CEO-to-worker pay ratio today: 280-to-1
Trickle-down economics was always a sham.
Nothing has ever trickled down.
CEO-to-worker pay ratio in 1990: 75-1
CEO-to-worker pay ratio today: 280-to-1
Trickle-down economics was always a sham.
Nothing has ever trickled down.
She paints a picture of an industry that all too often ignores bad actors until those bad actors threaten them financially.
aftermath.site/sucker-punch...
Not long after Ghost of Yotei was announced, the GG crowd sensed a new online obsession and began dogpiling on it.
Not long after Ghost of Yotei was announced, the GG crowd sensed a new online obsession and began dogpiling on it.