sobex.bsky.social
LightNews LightNews
sobex.bsky.social
@sobex.bsky.social
70 followers 280 following 790 posts
Posts Replies Media Videos
Reposted by sobex.bsky.social
jeredejere.bsky.social
De toute évidence l'Europe est incapable, pour des raisons financières, politiques et psychologiques, de mettre les moyens nécessaires pour contrer la menace russe. Mais y a encore des neuneus pour caqueter que "les élites européennes veulent la guerre", alors que tout montre le contraire.
December 26, 2025 at 9:50 PM
Reposted by sobex.bsky.social
cedricmas.bsky.social
Je suis de droite (enfin je pensais l'être) et je suis plus progressiste et antifasciste que beaucoup de gens qui se prétendent de gauche.
Ce monde est devenu une vaste tragi-comédie. Et si je reste convaincu que cette époque se finira bien, je commence à douter hein...
natacha.bsky.social Natacha @natacha.bsky.social · 4d
Labour supporters are the most homophobic and almost the most transphobic.
Labour voters would be most likely to feel disappointed if their child came out as gay or didn't want children, but Reform voters are most likely to feel disappointed if their child was transgender "I would be disappointed or angry..." All Conservative voting intention Labour Liberal Democrat Reform UK The Green Party If you had a son who told you he was gay If you had a daughter who told you she was gay If you had a child who told you they did not want to have kids If you had a child who told you they were transgender 22% 22% 16% 38% 21% 21% 17% 46% 33% 32% 28% 43% 13% 12% 11% 28% 26% 27% 17% 49% 12% 12% More in Common 22% More in Common • December 2025
December 27, 2025 at 6:59 PM
Reposted by sobex.bsky.social
jean-no.bsky.social
Je découvre la vulgarisation historique à base d'histoires "secrètes" horrifiques ou croustillantes de revanche, de torture, d'esclavagisme (avec les mêmes histoires tantôt situées à la Réunion, tantôt aux Antilles)... Le tout à coup d'IA.
Décliné par x comptes youtube ou facebook.
Capture d'un post de "Vérités Françaises". Images par IA et "grand secret" sur la sexualité à Rome... Capture d'un post de "Vérités Françaises". Images par IA et histoire de vengeance d'un esclave. Capture d'un post de "Vérités Françaises". Images par IA racontant apparemment l'histoire d'un esclave qui aurait engrossé les filles de sa maîtresse. Capture d'un post de "Vérités Françaises". IA : Un couple de personnes blanches verse un verre de vin sur un homme noir, avec qui (selon la légende qui accompagne l'image), il serait en affaires, à leur insu.
December 27, 2025 at 10:24 AM
Reposted by sobex.bsky.social
sobex.social.sciences.re.ap.brid.gy
#civilization7 End game be like.

Aye, I’m Edward Teach, the antiquarian piratefrom the British Museum, I’m here to sink Napoleon boats and liberate some artifacts, to be presented the World Fair.
December 27, 2025 at 12:13 PM
Reposted by sobex.bsky.social
andyscollick.bsky.social
There is a reason why they are called an "independent nuclear deterrent". French and British nuclear weapons are there to deter people like Trump and Vance, not just Putin and Xi.

Germany, Poland, Ukraine and others also need nukes.
kingstonareif.bsky.social Kingston Reif @kingstonareif.bsky.social · 1d
“If they [the UK and France] allow themselves to be overwhelmed with very destructive moral ideas, then you allow nuclear weapons to fall in the hands of people who can actually cause very, very serious harm to the US.”
Full transcript: JD Vance on American identity
unherd.com
December 27, 2025 at 10:24 AM
Reposted by sobex.bsky.social
monniauxd.bsky.social
How interesting.
strictlychristo.bsky.social StrictlyChristo 🇺🇦🌻🚫👑 @strictlychristo.bsky.social · Nov 8
Steve Bannon: "If we lose the midterms and we lose 2028, some in this room are going to prison, myself included."
December 27, 2025 at 7:40 AM
Reposted by sobex.bsky.social
joshuabhoe.bsky.social
These a**holes

Two months ago, they were calling the same decline in crime "fake news," and now they are taking credit for it...which is ludicrous

They are total clowns
December 27, 2025 at 8:25 AM
Reposted by sobex.bsky.social
nin10ja.bsky.social
Welcome back artists!🖌🎨✨️
Quote Post with an old piece that you still like!

(all my drawings are old pieces😓)
a drawing from 2023 (I think) of Rosalina from super mario galaxy in space As it happens, space is quite large and travel throughout space can be time consuming.
December 27, 2025 at 1:13 AM
Reposted by sobex.bsky.social
owiowifouettemoi.bsky.social
Accurate
beatgrrrl.bsky.social Beatgrrrl @beatgrrrl.bsky.social · 1d
Gingerbread 2025 Dumpster 🔥
2025 "dumpster fire" gingerbread house made for the holiday season.
December 27, 2025 at 9:55 AM
Reposted by sobex.bsky.social
bretdevereaux.bsky.social
Imagine how fried-by-white-supremacist-over-online-bullshit your brain needs to be to think that Britain or France's immigration policy is a greater threat than the nuclear arsenals of actual geopolitical rivals like China, North Korea or Russia.
militaryanalyst.bsky.social The Analyst @militaryanalyst.bsky.social · 2d
JD VANCE THINKS BRITAIN & FRANCE ARE AMERICAS LIKELY ENEMIES.
The world is getting bizarrely screwed with this kind of bull being spewed out.
December 26, 2025 at 10:21 PM
Reposted by sobex.bsky.social
jwjones252.bsky.social
From Andrew Tate's lips (ew) to the Vice President's ears, wouldn't be surprised if he started presenting this on the podcast interview circuit they've got him doing
Far-right podcaster and alleged human trafficker Andrew Tate struck a similar, if somewhat more menacing, tone to Partridge. Back in September, he posted this screed to his X account, which is still followed by JD Vance: "Stop letting women vote, stop giving women position [sic] as judges, stop giving women political appointments. As soon as only men run government and law, all the problems disappear. Women now understand that without male protection they’re nothing but victims. You are not a girl boss. There is no such thing. Crying for Iryana is a wake up call for females. GOOD. WOMEN: giving you political and societal power is how we ended up here. Liberalism is just girl feels. If you really care about womens safety, drop all female ego and obey men.We built you a safe society, you ruined it with ego, we will build it again. Obey."
November 6, 2025 at 2:20 PM
Reposted by sobex.bsky.social
kenwhite.bsky.social
This is a pretty misleading choice of quote to run from me after Mr. Brahman pursued me at length for something that would meet his ideological priors. I’ve asked him never to contact me again.
December 26, 2025 at 4:26 PM
Reposted by sobex.bsky.social
jamellebouie.net
more confirmation that lurking clearly behind this idea of the “heritage american” is a straightforward contempt for the actual history and tradition of this country, such that vermeule has to hallucinate a framework to justify his desire to jettison the clear meaning of the 14th amendment
paolosandro.bsky.social Paolo Sandro @paolosandro.bsky.social · 1d
I had missed this latest delirium by Adrian Vermeule on birthright citizenship

'Common law?! NAH, it's the Roman law of adoption that should govern the interpretation of the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution!'

thenewdigest.substack.com/p/immigratio...
What I suggest is different. Although broadly in the spirit of Aquinas’ two-or-three generations test insofar as it emphasizes the duties rather than the rights of immigrants who becomes citizens, it is derived not from theological principles but from a civil-law analogy — an analogy to the Roman law of adoption. After all, inclusion within “our posterity” may ordinarily arise not only through natural descent, but through legal adoption. In brief, I suggest that the legal immigrant should understand himself as an adopted son of a natural and concretely existing family, the American family, and this brings with it particular duties of filial piety and reverence for that particular family and for its thick heritage and traditions. Our laws as made, interpreted and applied should reflect that understanding as well. Because it is an analogy, not an identity, what I propose is not a set of legal rules to be directly mapped from Roman law into the American legal system. Rather it is a suggestion that the Roman law of adoption rested on a set of discernible principles of legal justice and political morality that represent the spirit of the laws bearing on immigration and citizenship in America — a time-honored mode of legal interpretation here, albeit not an originalist mode. Such principles should affect the interpretation of actually existing legal texts, rules, and doctrines; they should be understood as the soul of our law of citizenship. Needless to say, this does not answer or even purport to speak to all questions bearing on immigration. I do not speak here, for example, to the enforcement of the immigration laws against illegal immigrants, or to prospective questions of policy about exactly how much legal immigration, if any, there should be, and from where. All I address is the question what principles of legal justice and political duty apply, under existing law, to the immigrant who is already here legally. To that end I suggest a conceptual model for understanding the role and obligations of that immigrant — what justice classically understood requires of him.
December 27, 2025 at 12:01 AM
Reposted by sobex.bsky.social
andycraig.bsky.social
Conflating adoption with citizenship would have been bizarre gibberish to the Romans. But if you really want to draw an analogy, the famously unique thing about Roman citizenship is how they were (relatively, in fits and starts) so much more liberal in granting its expansion than competing powers.
paolosandro.bsky.social Paolo Sandro @paolosandro.bsky.social · 1d
I had missed this latest delirium by Adrian Vermeule on birthright citizenship

'Common law?! NAH, it's the Roman law of adoption that should govern the interpretation of the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution!'

thenewdigest.substack.com/p/immigratio...
What I suggest is different. Although broadly in the spirit of Aquinas’ two-or-three generations test insofar as it emphasizes the duties rather than the rights of immigrants who becomes citizens, it is derived not from theological principles but from a civil-law analogy — an analogy to the Roman law of adoption. After all, inclusion within “our posterity” may ordinarily arise not only through natural descent, but through legal adoption. In brief, I suggest that the legal immigrant should understand himself as an adopted son of a natural and concretely existing family, the American family, and this brings with it particular duties of filial piety and reverence for that particular family and for its thick heritage and traditions. Our laws as made, interpreted and applied should reflect that understanding as well. Because it is an analogy, not an identity, what I propose is not a set of legal rules to be directly mapped from Roman law into the American legal system. Rather it is a suggestion that the Roman law of adoption rested on a set of discernible principles of legal justice and political morality that represent the spirit of the laws bearing on immigration and citizenship in America — a time-honored mode of legal interpretation here, albeit not an originalist mode. Such principles should affect the interpretation of actually existing legal texts, rules, and doctrines; they should be understood as the soul of our law of citizenship. Needless to say, this does not answer or even purport to speak to all questions bearing on immigration. I do not speak here, for example, to the enforcement of the immigration laws against illegal immigrants, or to prospective questions of policy about exactly how much legal immigration, if any, there should be, and from where. All I address is the question what principles of legal justice and political duty apply, under existing law, to the immigrant who is already here legally. To that end I suggest a conceptual model for understanding the role and obligations of that immigrant — what justice classically understood requires of him.
December 27, 2025 at 12:15 AM
Reposted by sobex.bsky.social
bretdevereaux.bsky.social
This is extremely dumb for a variety of reasons but perhaps the most obvious is that the Romans didn't apply their adoption law to grants of citizenship.

I cannot communicate how basic an error he is making here. Staggeringly elementary, a thing you learn in Roman Civ 101.
paolosandro.bsky.social Paolo Sandro @paolosandro.bsky.social · 1d
I had missed this latest delirium by Adrian Vermeule on birthright citizenship

'Common law?! NAH, it's the Roman law of adoption that should govern the interpretation of the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution!'

thenewdigest.substack.com/p/immigratio...
What I suggest is different. Although broadly in the spirit of Aquinas’ two-or-three generations test insofar as it emphasizes the duties rather than the rights of immigrants who becomes citizens, it is derived not from theological principles but from a civil-law analogy — an analogy to the Roman law of adoption. After all, inclusion within “our posterity” may ordinarily arise not only through natural descent, but through legal adoption. In brief, I suggest that the legal immigrant should understand himself as an adopted son of a natural and concretely existing family, the American family, and this brings with it particular duties of filial piety and reverence for that particular family and for its thick heritage and traditions. Our laws as made, interpreted and applied should reflect that understanding as well. Because it is an analogy, not an identity, what I propose is not a set of legal rules to be directly mapped from Roman law into the American legal system. Rather it is a suggestion that the Roman law of adoption rested on a set of discernible principles of legal justice and political morality that represent the spirit of the laws bearing on immigration and citizenship in America — a time-honored mode of legal interpretation here, albeit not an originalist mode. Such principles should affect the interpretation of actually existing legal texts, rules, and doctrines; they should be understood as the soul of our law of citizenship. Needless to say, this does not answer or even purport to speak to all questions bearing on immigration. I do not speak here, for example, to the enforcement of the immigration laws against illegal immigrants, or to prospective questions of policy about exactly how much legal immigration, if any, there should be, and from where. All I address is the question what principles of legal justice and political duty apply, under existing law, to the immigrant who is already here legally. To that end I suggest a conceptual model for understanding the role and obligations of that immigrant — what justice classically understood requires of him.
December 27, 2025 at 12:47 AM
Reposted by sobex.bsky.social
pjhvan.bsky.social
GREENLAND UPDATE: 🇬🇱🇬🇱🇬🇱🇬🇱🇬🇱🇬🇱

Message from the Premier of Greenland
December 24, 2025 at 3:06 PM
Reposted by sobex.bsky.social
radleybalko.bsky.social
This administration lied about the people it sent to an overseas torture prison. It lies about the people it’s deporting. It lies every day to gain political advantage. Not a chance in hell they won’t lie about huge swaths of people they suspect might vote for the other party.
December 27, 2025 at 12:31 AM
Reposted by sobex.bsky.social
rawstory.com
A white Afrikaner from South Africa who came to the United States expecting preferential refugee treatment from the Trump administration found himself blindsided when he ended up in handcuffs.
'Never expected this': White Afrikaner blindsided with detention despite Trump's pledge
A white Afrikaner from South Africa who came to the United States expecting preferential refugee treatment from the Trump administration found himself blindsided when he ended up in handcuffs.President Donald Trump promised that white Afrikaners would receive preferential refugee status because he c...
bit.ly
December 27, 2025 at 1:00 AM
Reposted by sobex.bsky.social
sailorrooscout.bsky.social
Well now, would you look at that? A massive, 4-YEAR-LONG study of NEARLY 30 MILLION people in France found that individuals who received a COVID-19 mRNA vaccine had a 74% LOWER risk of death from severe COVID-19 compared to unvaccinated individuals and ZERO increased risk of all-cause mortality.
December 26, 2025 at 5:00 PM
Reposted by sobex.bsky.social
zachrabiroff.com
Billionaires threaten this every time something vaguely left-wing is on a ballot (they just finished threatening to leave NYC two months ago), and never understand why, "I, Adolf Bork, inventor of the beloved Dystopia Machine, will reduce my presence in your life forever" doesn't win people over
nytimes.com The New York Times @nytimes.com · 1d
Billionaires are considering cutting or reducing their ties to California by the end of the year because of a proposed ballot measure that could tax the state’s wealthiest residents.
A Wealth Tax Floated in California Has Billionaires Thinking of Leaving
It’s uncertain whether the proposal will reach the statewide ballot in November, but some billionaires like Peter Thiel and Larry Page may be unwilling to take the risk.
nyti.ms
December 27, 2025 at 12:37 AM
Reposted by sobex.bsky.social
mrsbettybowers.bsky.social
In courts of law, this is known as consciousness of guilt.
strictlychristo.bsky.social StrictlyChristo 🇺🇦🌻🚫👑 @strictlychristo.bsky.social · Nov 8
Steve Bannon: "If we lose the midterms and we lose 2028, some in this room are going to prison, myself included."
December 26, 2025 at 7:59 PM
Reposted by sobex.bsky.social
gro-tsen.bsky.social
An analysis of the rise, decline, and rise again, of Internet piracy⌫file sharing — how the convenience of Netflix had made it gone away, and how the fragmentation of streaming platforms brought it back: www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvkW...
Streaming Crushed Piracy then Brought it back by Accident
YouTube video by Not General Knowledge
www.youtube.com
December 26, 2025 at 9:57 PM
Reposted by sobex.bsky.social
princessluna.bsky.social
Jost so you kno, Greanland is stell not fore sale.
a red and white flag with a white circle in the center
Alt: The Greenlandic national flag, a red and white flag with a white circle in the center.
media.tenor.com
December 26, 2025 at 9:02 PM
Reposted by sobex.bsky.social
princessluna.bsky.social
(Also this is a Danish account that whole heartedly support the Greenlandic people's right to self determenism, and bid for true independence.)
December 26, 2025 at 9:05 PM
Reposted by sobex.bsky.social
dumplingmenace.bsky.social
you have my attention
Repealing anticircumvention law is a targeted strike on America’s most profitable companies, and it will have an especially severe impact on Tesla, whose hyperinflated price-to-earnings ratio reflects investors’ pleasure at the Tesla business model, which involves charging drivers every month for subscription features and software upgrades that expire when a car changes hands. Musk owes his power to the digital locks that keep this business model intact. If it were legal for mechanics all over the world to jailbreak Teslas and unlock all those features for one price, Tesla’s share price would collapse—taking with it the overvalued shares Musk uses to collateralize the loans he took out to buy Twitter and the US presidency
December 26, 2025 at 1:28 PM