Even assuming that that’s true (which I would say is unlikely), the costs of building, assembling and maintaining a space-based data centre are not going to be similar to a terrestrial one!
Even assuming that that’s true (which I would say is unlikely), the costs of building, assembling and maintaining a space-based data centre are not going to be similar to a terrestrial one!
I would politely but very, very firmly disagree with that analysis (and note that not even the paper itself seriously claims that total costs will be comparable any time soon).
I would politely but very, very firmly disagree with that analysis (and note that not even the paper itself seriously claims that total costs will be comparable any time soon).
Leaving aside technical and physics problems, there’s a fundamental barrier: building a data centre in space will be hugely more expensive than doing the same on Earth.
Unless we literally run out of space (unlikely), there is zero reason not to build it here
Can well imagine, in a couple of decades’ time, “do you remember that bit when they wanted to put data centres in space by the late 2020s?” being the kind of anecdote people tell about AI capex mania.
www.ft.com/content/a5cf...
Leaving aside technical and physics problems, there’s a fundamental barrier: building a data centre in space will be hugely more expensive than doing the same on Earth.
Unless we literally run out of space (unlikely), there is zero reason not to build it here
For countries with age-gating already in place (such as the UK), there are already many cases of queer servers being hit with an adults-only rating solely for containing queer content.
For countries with age-gating already in place (such as the UK), there are already many cases of queer servers being hit with an adults-only rating solely for containing queer content.
By doing so, you leave it to platforms to decide what kids can see - American platforms who take their lead from the US government.
Meaning that right now, age gates are being used to prevent access to any queer-related content.
By doing so, you leave it to platforms to decide what kids can see - American platforms who take their lead from the US government.
Meaning that right now, age gates are being used to prevent access to any queer-related content.
Also that there will be "Scottish MP ministerial resignations" afterwards
Ministers saying it's the end game...
If you get rid of a comms director, you had a bad comms director.
If you lose four comms directors in two years, you have a garbage in garbage out problem.
Thanks Chris.
If you get rid of a comms director, you had a bad comms director.
If you lose four comms directors in two years, you have a garbage in garbage out problem.
“After careful reflection, I have decided to resign from the government. The decision to appoint Peter Mandelson was wrong. He has damaged our party, our country and trust in politics itself.”
Which begs the question: who did and why aren’t they resigning too?
Which begs the question: who did and why aren’t they resigning too?
Who else is staying up for the Super Bowl?
Who else is staying up for the Super Bowl?
If you ran a Nazi newspaper, it was harder to monetise because you’d have to find advertisers willing to associate with you.
Now, platforms will pay you directly and intermediate with advertisers.
If you ran a Nazi newspaper, it was harder to monetise because you’d have to find advertisers willing to associate with you.
Now, platforms will pay you directly and intermediate with advertisers.
Unfortunately, one of the most societally damaging aspects of social media is also one of the simplest: the fact that you can directly monetise your activity means that grifters are incentivised to spam whatever will maximise attention, regardless of truth, ethics or anything else.
In practice, it’s amazing how often the answer is much simpler – someone is chasing either (a) clout, (b) money, or (c) both.
He says it's not political. He just wants to make money from far-right anger.
Read what he says: www.londoncentric.media/p/london-tik...
Unfortunately, one of the most societally damaging aspects of social media is also one of the simplest: the fact that you can directly monetise your activity means that grifters are incentivised to spam whatever will maximise attention, regardless of truth, ethics or anything else.
Between the FT and others pursuing existing lines of inquiry, and almost guaranteed new revelations from the ISC releases, this won’t go away no matter how much Starmer hopes it will.
Downing Street has refused to say whether Sir Keir Starmer knew Palantir was a client of Peter Mandelson’s lobbying firm when they both visited the company in Washington last February — ahead of it winning a £240mn UK government contract.
www.ft.com/content/5bba...
Between the FT and others pursuing existing lines of inquiry, and almost guaranteed new revelations from the ISC releases, this won’t go away no matter how much Starmer hopes it will.
(A rather spectacular goof from The Spectator...)
(A rather spectacular goof from The Spectator...)
*UK POLICE SAY CARRYING OUT SEARCHES IN WILTSHIRE, CAMDEN
*UK POLICE CARRYING OUT SEARCH WARRANTS OVER 72-YEAR-OLD MAN
*UK POLICE SEARCH RELATED TO PROBE INTO PUBLIC OFFICE MISCONDUCT
*UK POLICE SAY NO ARREST, ENQUIRIES ONGOING
*UK POLICE SAY CARRYING OUT SEARCHES IN WILTSHIRE, CAMDEN
*UK POLICE CARRYING OUT SEARCH WARRANTS OVER 72-YEAR-OLD MAN
*UK POLICE SEARCH RELATED TO PROBE INTO PUBLIC OFFICE MISCONDUCT
*UK POLICE SAY NO ARREST, ENQUIRIES ONGOING
But, given what was already known and in the public domain when he was appointed, limiting scrutiny to these three specific questions is a completely failure of judgement and responsibility.
But, given what was already known and in the public domain when he was appointed, limiting scrutiny to these three specific questions is a completely failure of judgement and responsibility.