David Rafferty
@davidrafferty.bsky.social
4K followers 4.3K following 6.4K posts
Historian. ARC DECRA Fellow @ Adelaide with project “How Republics Die: Rome’s democratic breakdown in the 1st century BCE”. Husband and father. I’m the one who set cats and dogs against each other. Not endorsed by employer. https://davidrafferty.org
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
davidrafferty.bsky.social
I’m a simple man. All I want out of life is for Kerry O’Keeffe to interview Chappell Roan while under the impression she is named for (or even the daughter of) either Ian or Greg Chappell.
davidrafferty.bsky.social
But also not valued, and so doesn’t attract a high price.
davidrafferty.bsky.social
I saw your tweet, turned it on, and then 20 seconds later Essendon scored a goal. I’m their good luck charm.
davidrafferty.bsky.social
Kyle Sandilands has had a lock on this title for decades.
Reposted by David Rafferty
donni.bsky.social
It’s actually pretty bad for your mental health to know stuff
davidrafferty.bsky.social
And disturbed by the Nike riots?
davidrafferty.bsky.social
At the very least, articles on Beveridge’s Academic Assistance Council. And the (very obvious) parallels to this case.
davidrafferty.bsky.social
Rather naively, I thought the Black Panther tweet had killed this stuff.
Reposted by David Rafferty
mobydickatsea.bsky.social
God keep me from ever completing anything.
davidrafferty.bsky.social
“I want to call you Daddy.”
Susannah Harker and Ian Richardson in House of Cards.
Reposted by David Rafferty
jenyth.com
these thoughts have been rattling around in my brain for about a year and i finally had some time to scribble them down. some thoughts on how games might emulate the act of 'doing' history

jenyth.com/2025/01/03/h...
Historical interpretation as non-linear narrative
How games can reflect history as a discipline, not just historical facts.
jenyth.com
davidrafferty.bsky.social
I’ve read a lot - A LOT - of really good jokes.
conradhackett.bsky.social
Has anything great happened in your life because of social media?
davidrafferty.bsky.social
You see, Google was making an astronomical amount of money providing a product that worked. But they decided that wasn’t enough. So now they’re making even more money providing a product that *doesn’t* work.
Reposted by David Rafferty
picketer.bsky.social
Web search may be the only really significant technological advance where we *decided* to just bork it completely. It's like we had a steam turbine ships with radio and people said "fuck it, we are going back to slave galleys plus a bloke on top of the mast with some flags"
thomasfuchs.at
How many trillions of dollars have been invested into this technology so far?
Google search for "austria hungary in space"

Google excitedly tells you about the 1889 orbital flight, and that by 1908 there was a Mars research output with 30 people.
davidrafferty.bsky.social
While I understand the temptation to dunk on her because of this, it’s not that different to lefties enjoying Tolkien. We can enjoy art without agreeing with (or even noticing) the author’s moral or political standpoints.
paulhaine.bsky.social
Kemi Badenoch claiming Terry Pratchett as her favourite author is wild
davidrafferty.bsky.social
Also: you can’t treat them like shit! It’s only by threatening to deport them and their families that you get the tiniest bit of discipline!
davidrafferty.bsky.social
My theory is that the daily-experience motivation of rich conservatives (as opposed to big-picture motivation) is that it’s hard to get reliable domestic servants.

So they want to create a society where that will be easier.
Reposted by David Rafferty
rattatatouille.bsky.social
The 90s had a lot of missteps but the then-earnest belief in diversity and multiculturalism brought on by post-Cold War optimism was one of it better fruits
helldude.bsky.social
the wave of weaponized nostalgia for 90s-style multiculturalism and political correctness is gonna hit different
davidrafferty.bsky.social
Ivanhoe is the story of a Russian farmer and his tool.
davidrafferty.bsky.social
One of my favourite bits of Roman history: the conspiracy to rig the elections in 54 BCE. The best detail is at the end: to hold both sides to the deal, money was held in trust by third parties and noted in account books.

Cue Stringer Bell: "Are you taking notes on a criminal fucking conspiracy?"
The Consuls are in the thick of a tremendous scandal. The candidate C. Memmius read out in the Senate the text of a compact which he and his fellow candidate Domitius had made with the Consuls providing that, if they were themselves elected, they would furnish three Augurs who would state that they had been present at the passing of a lex curiata which had never been passed, and two Consulars who would state that they had witnessed a senatorial decree making provision for the consular provinces, though the Senate had not even met; failing this, they were both to forfeit the sum of HS 4,000,000 to the Consuls. The compact, which, as was stated, was not an oral one but had been entered in the account books of many persons with names and full details, was produced by Memmius on Pompey's advice with the names cancelled. This exposure leaves Appius where he was— nothing lost to be sure. But for his colleague it is a collapse, he is
utterly discredited. Memmius, having broken up the coalition
davidrafferty.bsky.social
I can’t speak for others, but for me it’s because I’m an historian.