Pabst Blue Gibbon
banner
schmendimite.bsky.social
Pabst Blue Gibbon
@schmendimite.bsky.social
650 followers 290 following 5.7K posts
Outside unless I'm not, forever just one step ahead of the reaper (Lyme disease).
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
I'm not seeing Shaun's grifting angle on this yet; I assume he's working on it though
Reposted by Pabst Blue Gibbon
The SNAP program "maintains a reserve, currently estimated to be about $5 billion, that can help cover emergencies and shortfalls."

The Trump administration is refusing to use those funds.

No words.
Trump Administration Won’t Use Emergency Funds for Food Stamps During Shutdown
www.nytimes.com
Reposted by Pabst Blue Gibbon
Trump last month: “If something happens really bad, just blame AI.” gizmodo.com/trump-blames...
Trump: "They cheated on a commercial. Ronald Reagan loved tariffs and they said he didn't. And I guess it was AI or something. They cheated badly. Canada got caught cheating on a commercial. Can you believe it?"
Unbelievably fucked fever dream stuff here
Oh my god some fucking tech dingdong posted this on Twitter with the caption "AI games are going to be amazing" totally seriously, you have to watch it. You have to. In full screen.
Hell yeah episemologically rigorous bigfeets
Reposted by Pabst Blue Gibbon
“Tricia McLaughlin said protesters “shot at agents” with fireworks and threw objects at agents [and] Agents...gave protesters multiple warnings.

The video of the incident does not show protesters throwing rocks or fireworks at agents, nor can agents be heard warning protesters.”
Border Patrol Boss Bovino Tear-Gasses Chicago Crowd, Violating Judge’s Order, Lawyers Say
New video shows Border Patrol chief Greg Bovino tossing a tear gas canister toward people in Little Village Thursday. Attorneys in an ongoing lawsuit over force against peaceful protesters say Bovino ...
blockclubchicago.org
This is why people think this publication is a joke
Reposted by Pabst Blue Gibbon
it’s beyond comprehension that scenes like this have become routine in chicago.

masked soldiers are carelessly lobbing chemical weapons—that are banned from use during warfare—on random residential streets.

this is the third time feds have tear-gassed residents in chicago *this week!*
Video from witness here from the moment CBP gassed neighbors who had gathered outside after the kidnapping.

Agent rolls a canister at the crowd out of the window of their car as they reverse away from people with whistles and bikes.
Reposted by Pabst Blue Gibbon
NEW: NBC News confirms that the Jacqueline Kennedy Garden, on the east side of the White House, has been destroyed as part of the demolition of the East Wing.

(📸 Getty Images)
I'm sure there are some unhinged randos going to bat for this guy screaming about AIPAC- there are always will be. And there are many more leftists telling those people to shut the fuck up. You have no point. Now kindly fuck off out of my mentions.
Can you repeat that word salad in English, please
Screenshot of Jon Lovett going ride or die for this guy are all over here, claiming this is a lefty purity test cancelation, while Sanders is getting dragged for his continued support. But sure, plug your ears and close your eyes.
[French Observer]:
imagine the starving peasants giving a single fuck about King Louis putting yet another ballroom addition onto Versailles
Using wojacks in 2025 is beyond pathetic boomer shit. Feel sorry for you, truly.
Reposted by Pabst Blue Gibbon
there's something so satisfying about saying to yourself "oh whatever, shut up, who cares" as you click cancel on a draft post
Sure but that's not making a legal argument that the 22nd Amendment doesn't apply. It's simply ignoring it altogether. Either SCOTUS constructs some other pretzel-logic reason why it doesn't disqualify him (very likely, just not with this "non-consecutive" stuff), or red states have to float SCOTUS.
But Jamelle if a Democrat were in office they'd be picking winners and losers and free market conservatives hate that
Reposted by Pabst Blue Gibbon
There's no provision in the text or subtext of the Amendment saying anything about the terms or any portion thereof being consecutive. It says two terms, period.
I mean they can try their luck given how nakedly partisan and shameless this SCOTUS is but there's no reading that supports it whatsoever
I've literally seen multiple posts from lib/centrists pundits with decent followings besides bemoaninghis "cancelling" as a leftist purity test, gtfooh with these fucking randos that mean jack shit.
Look at your pinned comment, ffs. By your own logic you'd support this guy if he won the primary, and meanwhile you have lefties yelling at the guy you claim is still their standard bearer and you're claiming they're going to bat for this guy in droves, instead. Lost in the sauce.