Emily Grubert
banner
gruberte.bsky.social
Emily Grubert
@gruberte.bsky.social

civil engineer / environmental sociologist. energy, water, climate, buildings, justice. fossil phaseout / universal programs. she / her. bunnies.

Environmental science 38%
Engineering 24%

you can tell i'm doing a revision because i am poasting but i just suddenly realized this fucking review is AI

the copyright / IP implications of a confidential MS going into these models aside, what a waste of my one wild and precious life politely explaining the critiques are bad

this article does the funniest thing in the world to me (which is true of basically every COP summary) in opening with "omg can you even IMAGINE, these people were working for TWELVE HOURS"

i appreciate the volunteer labor of my colleagues who peer review my work but also i am very tired of having to do point-by-point responses to comments like

"you need a citation for the claim that fossil fuel combustion drives climate change"

and

"an LLM would probably make your paper better"

but ... markets!

NO

profitability is not the right sorting mechanism for asset phase-out!
Tfw what you, and many others, have been screaming about finally gets traction: "a big and growing number of countries recognise that a managed, collectively navigated route to fossil fuel phaseout is preferable to the chaotic absence of planning we currently have"

cc: @gruberte.bsky.social
‘Fossil fuel giants finally in the crosshairs’: Cop30 avoids total failure with last-ditch deal
It took some oblique wording, but Saudi Arabia made a last-minute decision to sign deal that marks departure for Cop
www.theguardian.com

Reposted by Emily Grubert

Tfw what you, and many others, have been screaming about finally gets traction: "a big and growing number of countries recognise that a managed, collectively navigated route to fossil fuel phaseout is preferable to the chaotic absence of planning we currently have"

cc: @gruberte.bsky.social
‘Fossil fuel giants finally in the crosshairs’: Cop30 avoids total failure with last-ditch deal
It took some oblique wording, but Saudi Arabia made a last-minute decision to sign deal that marks departure for Cop
www.theguardian.com

Reposted by Emily Grubert

I cannot even begin to unpack how disappointed I have been that so many colleagues doing research on how to mitigate and adapt to climate change in US agriculture have been squandering their time to produce small science that just parrots and validates industry talking points. Yuck. Yuck. Yuck.
Not doing 💩 science that benefits the fossil fuel lobby and big ag would not hurt too in my field lol

You are too kind!

Maybe so!! Is your friend obsessed with excellent and human-centered decarbonization? :D

WILD. this is the glory of being 1) the EiC and 2) a little more senior -- that I get to be like "wow, blocked"

Gotta say the next part where I was able to be like "hm, we don't tolerate that kind of interaction here, you no longer get to resubmit" was pretty cool. Love 2 protect my community.

Dispatches from being an editor: having a full professor tell me that my writing is "unworthy of a Stanford graduate" when I politely explained that his paper was not currently publishable

Side note: I'll probably be hiring a postdoc on similar themes, but will confirm that by early 2026.

Scope also includes how we dismantle stuff!
🚨job alert🚨

I'm looking to hire at least one PhD student for next year, looking at decarbonization-oriented technology deployment within an ethical frame of resource allocation and justice outcomes.

Full ad attached! Pref for CEEES admissions; deadline is 1 January.

I’m talking about the power plant part, mostly

Tbc just like with CDR I think it is bad to let buildout for AI happen in service of counterproductive things -- it's an appropriation of scarce resources that we really don't need -- my concern isn't "let 'em do it" but "I don't think people understand what electrification entails" on capacity

it's also a very problematic rounding error because it's spurring fossil build out! Google cheerfully emailed me that they're doing a new gas CCS plant for this. and it eats up capacity (institutional and otherwise) to do better stuff! I hate it!

AND

if we can't do ~100 GW, we're in big trouble

LLMs are high on my list of Not Worth the Resource Allocation, but I am worried about how worried we are about the power demand. the US needs to go from ~1 TW of dirty and/or old capacity now to 2? 6? 7? TW of clean new cap by 2050 to keep us warm, cool, and transported. AI is a rounding error.

Reposted by Emily Grubert

The fossil fuel industry has a long, sordid history of leaving behind toxic sites for taxpayers to clean up. State policy makers now need to protect taxpayers from the costs of stranded data centers and the gas plants and pipelines built to power them.

literally anyone who has ever been in a room where they weren't the most powerful person understands why "all of the above" energy doesn't work

Reposted by Emily Grubert

Reposted by Emily Grubert

challenge difficulty for chatbot-using applicants: impossible

a protip is not to plagiarize my paper in your application if you want me to fund you

Reposted by Richard S.J. Tol

It would seem they're still flaring in the Bakken.

P sure it’s business formal and also p sure I need this to happen again soon ❤️

My thrifted flannel is very professional and very clean!!!!

Also I’m wearing a belt and brand new shoes. YOU’RE WELCOME, THE LAW.
Elsevier just published an article advocating more AI-use in peer-review... that was written with the assistance of AI.

Abolish predatory journals (Elsevier).

www.elsevier.com/connect/reth...
It's been really, really nice seeing the Catholic social justice tradition in the US feel like it's empowered to spread its wings again without risking censure after a long time of being suppressed by US Catholic leadership, and it's exactly what I was hoping for from Pope Bob.

weird for a justice40 program, huh?

Oh shit you’re right, how could I have overlooked this