David M Hungerford III
davetheinverted.bsky.social
David M Hungerford III
@davetheinverted.bsky.social
55, cishet white dude. I mostly repost stuff; sometimes I comment on it. Participation will be sporadic depending upon my mental state.
Reposted by David M Hungerford III
Basically, yes. Federal agents in the performance of their duties cannot be subject to state prosecution

Some federal cases here: bsky.app/profile/greg...

You'd argue murder isn't within the scope of their duties

bsky.app/profile/se7e...
What is the argument for supremacy clause immunity (IANAL)?

That execution of federal laws allows feds to violate state law up to and including murder?
January 7, 2026 at 7:03 PM
Reposted by David M Hungerford III
No matter how many awful things come out of this White House, you can organize your community at the state and local level to fight back against the oligarchy.

Kudos to everyone who organized and won against Big Tech last year. Let’s keep up the fight this year and beyond.
January 7, 2026 at 6:01 PM
Reposted by David M Hungerford III
"He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures...

For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:"
January 7, 2026 at 6:55 PM
Reposted by David M Hungerford III
today in #9chickweedlane i learned that if the only way to tell your characters apart is through hair shape and color maybe don't put them in head-concealing hats, i have no idea who any of these people are
January 7, 2026 at 2:27 PM
Reposted by David M Hungerford III
Actions have consequences.
January 7, 2026 at 6:42 PM
Reposted by David M Hungerford III
losing my mind at the "she should have followed directions" people

really? really? you're cool with "if you don't follow directions, they get to kill you"? that seems like a good state of affairs to you? that seems like how law enforcement ought to work: instant obeisance or death?
January 7, 2026 at 6:25 PM
Reposted by David M Hungerford III
Masked ICE agents, it seems, are now killing American citizens on American streets.

Any Democrat who doesn’t support abolishing ICE should be instantly primaried and run out of the party.

This is non negotiable. You cannot support the continued existence of this fascist murderous secret police.
January 7, 2026 at 6:14 PM
Reposted by David M Hungerford III
It takes an enormous amount of courage to stand there, keep filming, and scream "What the fuck, you asshole" at someone wearing a badge who just shot and killed one of your neighbors in cold blood.
I need people to wrap their minds around the fact that here in Minneapolis, ICE broke the window of a vehicle yesterday, pepper sprayed the occupants, and arrested them, and shot another observer in the face today, and OBSERVERS ARE STILL GOING OUT TO PROTECT THEIR NEIGHBORS AT MASSIVE PERSONAL RISK
I’m eating lunch, I’m having a panic attack, I’m charging my phone, and then I’m going back out to try and keep my neighborhood safe.
January 7, 2026 at 6:13 PM
Reposted by David M Hungerford III
ICE has only existed since 2003. A Bush-era creation, it is a militarized federal secret police that has been imbued with the Supreme Court with the unconstitutional power to ignore the fourth amendment.

Abolishing it and salting the earth where it grew is the moderate stance.
June 9, 2025 at 8:46 PM
Reposted by David M Hungerford III
A reminder - before Trump, MAGA, Musk and Fox rewrote history - that this is what the entire country agreed had happened five years ago today:
January 6, 2026 at 12:40 PM
Reposted by David M Hungerford III
Posting @mgraber1.bsky.social 's book on January 6. It's about Sections 2, 3, and 4 of the Fourteenth Amendment and why the framers believed those, not today's famous Section 1, were essential to restoring democracy. 1/
Punish Treason, Reward Loyalty
In contemporary constitutional politics, Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment—which includes the citizenship, privileges and immunities, due process, ...
kansaspress.ku.edu
January 6, 2026 at 11:49 AM
Reposted by David M Hungerford III
Given that Trump's critics call it a kidnapping, and Trump says it's an apt term, I see no reason for the media not to use it. Literally both sides agree it's the proper description of what happened.
Q: Rodriguez called it a 'kidnapping' of Maduro

TRUMP: That's alright. That's not a bad term.
January 5, 2026 at 2:09 AM
Reposted by David M Hungerford III
Ah yes. The Cato Institute. Known pinkos.
January 4, 2026 at 7:56 PM
Reposted by David M Hungerford III
I want to remind everyone that the US has sanctioned members of the International Criminal Court for going through a formal legal process to identify international leaders who engaged in war crimes, making them vulnerable to arrest.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Why wasn't congressional authorization necessary?

RUBIO: It wasn't necessary because this was not an invasion. We didn't occupy a country. This was an arrest operation.
January 4, 2026 at 4:50 PM
Reposted by David M Hungerford III
Translate "Hail Victory" into German. Go on, Google translate is right there waiting.
If the Republican Party was an institution suited to hold power in a religiously and culturally pluralistic democracy, it would not allow (let alone encourage) its rising youth to gleefully Hitler post.

FWIW, they have now deleted that post with no apology or explanation.
January 4, 2026 at 6:04 PM
Reposted by David M Hungerford III
y’all i have a new high water mark in cybertruck wtfery
January 4, 2026 at 6:11 PM
Reposted by David M Hungerford III
Comer: "You're gonna see the Trump administration continue to freeze funds until Democrat governors do like what the Republican governors are doing: they're complying with the federal government, with the Trump administration."
January 4, 2026 at 5:47 PM
Reposted by David M Hungerford III
“Oh but if Democrats did that Republicans would just vote it down, wouldn’t convict and would rally their base to defend Trump’s crimes.”

Yeah, okay, make them do that then.
January 4, 2026 at 4:41 PM
Reposted by David M Hungerford III
excellent read -
January 3, 2026 at 9:35 PM
Reposted by David M Hungerford III
This is how you do it. No preamble to swear to God you don't like Maduro.
January 3, 2026 at 9:23 PM
Reposted by David M Hungerford III
😕
January 4, 2026 at 12:59 AM
Reposted by David M Hungerford III
4/ Look three steps ahead.

Now that the U.S. has triggered an "international armed conflict," Venezuelan nationals residing in the USA are "protected persons" under Geneva Convention IV.

Several significant legal implications flow from that. ...
January 4, 2026 at 4:25 PM
Reposted by David M Hungerford III
Nixon insisted the bombing of Cambodia was just targeting Viet Cong outposts there and not meant to undermine its government, but the bombings destabilized the Lon Nol government and paved the way for the Khmer Rouge’s killing fields and the massacre of more than a million people.
NBC's sources said that "the potential mission in Mexico is not designed to undermine the Mexican government." But that's what it will do if the US is doing CIA drone strikes on Mexican soil over the objections of the president.
January 4, 2026 at 7:22 PM
Reposted by David M Hungerford III
Trump has accomplished the feat of replicating 12 years of disastrous Reagan-Bush era foreign policy and tax + spending reforms in just 11 months. Truly impressive
January 4, 2026 at 8:15 PM