It means gay, effeminate, unmanly. Toxic masculinity isn't subtle or novel (or interesting), it's always the same crap again and again.
It means gay, effeminate, unmanly. Toxic masculinity isn't subtle or novel (or interesting), it's always the same crap again and again.
My latest for Democracy Docket lays out the case. Sign up now to access this and all premium content. hubs.ly/Q03CbHTt0
My latest for Democracy Docket lays out the case. Sign up now to access this and all premium content. hubs.ly/Q03CbHTt0
Because if I have to read their work AND then go read all of the documents they cited to ensure they're not putting my career at stake, I might as well just do the thing myself.
they’ve tried it, they keep noticing major errors in output, and they conclude that having to verify all that doesn’t actually save them time.
Because if I have to read their work AND then go read all of the documents they cited to ensure they're not putting my career at stake, I might as well just do the thing myself.
They didn’t just clock out. They walked away from people’s lives. NOTE: These are all red or purple districts.
They didn’t just clock out. They walked away from people’s lives. NOTE: These are all red or purple districts.
First, it is not what Congress "asked for." It is what a federal statute REQUIRES.
Second, WTF does "spirit but not intent" even mean?
CBS bent a knee and paid Trump, it has a new owner who wants to please Trump, and sadly this is the result.
MASSIE: No. They're flouting the spirit and the letter of the law. It's very troubling the posture that they've taken.
First, it is not what Congress "asked for." It is what a federal statute REQUIRES.
Second, WTF does "spirit but not intent" even mean?
CBS bent a knee and paid Trump, it has a new owner who wants to please Trump, and sadly this is the result.
MASSIE: No. They're flouting the spirit and the letter of the law. It's very troubling the posture that they've taken.
⬇️
⬇️
Gonna guess that more people suffer from the effects of usury than from possibly having to pee in a stall next to a trans person.
Gonna guess that more people suffer from the effects of usury than from possibly having to pee in a stall next to a trans person.
This means 'Do what is popular' is never a viable political strategy in and of itself because what's popular could be wrong and people can hate you for it!
This means 'Do what is popular' is never a viable political strategy in and of itself because what's popular could be wrong and people can hate you for it!
Matty Y: "Dems should focus less on climate change/renewable energy, it's a losing issue."
Sean Casten (an actual Congressman): "I won a purple district multiple times by focusing on those issues"
Lakshya: "YEAH BUT YOU DIDN'T OVERPERFORM"
They abandon solidarity at the drop of a hat in favor of stimulating themselves with grievance and bullying.
Branding isn’t ideology.
It’s branding.
They abandon solidarity at the drop of a hat in favor of stimulating themselves with grievance and bullying.
Branding isn’t ideology.
It’s branding.