Scholar

Andy Reisinger

H-index: 32
Environmental science 36%
Economics 29%
andyreisinger.bsky.social
Thanks, up look out for the podcast! If it's of interest, I recently gave a longer overview lecture on overshot for the Euro-Mediterranean Centre on Climate Change. youtu.be/TzkoJaLQ8ik

Lecture starts at 8.15 in that recording.
PowerPoint slide showing a graph with several scenarios of rising global warming above 1.5 degrees, and two scenarios where global warming  exceeds 1.5 degrees for a few decades but then declines back to or below 1.5 degrees by 2100. Next to this are three 'burning embers' bars from the IPCC 6th Assessment Report that illustrate the increasing risk as global warming increases, for unique and threatened species, extreme weather events, and the distribution of impacts.
iopp-environment.bsky.social
🌍New #ERL focus collection on #climate #overshoot is open!

Linked to @iiasa.ac.at Overshoots conference in Vienna this week. ERL Publisher Lauren Carter will be attending, email to discuss a contribution: [email protected]

📅Deadline: 30 April 2026
🔗 iopscience.iop.org/collections/...
andyreisinger.bsky.social
"We find no significant difference between the climate strategies of companies that purchased credits and those that did not. [...] Yet, we document that for large-scale offsetters in the airline industry, carbon credit purchases competed with financing internal decarbonisation measures."
The negligible role of carbon offsetting in corporate climate strategies - Nature Communications
This study of 89 multinational firms finds no significant link between voluntarily offsetting emissions and decarbonization speed. Firms spend little funds on carbon credits, and emission offsetting i...
www.nature.com

Reposted by: Andy Reisinger

rkfatheree.bsky.social
If for no other reason than to counter the apparent argument that “bad people” deserve to be shot in cold blood. Why else misrepresent his life’s work?
michaelhobbes.bsky.social
"Charlie Kirk gave me the courage to be more transphobic" is a wild thing to put in a both-sides hagiography
www.nytimes.com/2025/09/11/u...
‘He Gave Me Confidence’: How Charlie Kirk Connected With Young Men
With his right-wing group Turning Point USA, Mr. Kirk engaged controversial topics. Some students were inspired. Others found his views appalling.


As a Christian, he did not always feel he could say what he actually thought about the issue.

“It’s kind of scary to say what you believe in, especially in this cancel culture,” said Porter LaFeber, a 22-year-old studying sciences at Utah Valley University who was at an event on Wednesday where Mr. Kirk was killed. “Charlie Kirk seemed like he just went totally above that. He kind of gave a voice to the people that were maybe a little bit scared.”

“He gave me the confidence to be able to believe what I believe,” Mr. LaFeber added.

Reposted by: Andy Reisinger

saycheeselouise.bsky.social
Even if you don't vote for your council (pls do but), tick that box for the referendum.

It is BINDING for three terms - so if it fails, no Māori ward for nearly a decade.

And EVERYONE votes, not just Māori. Tāngata Tiriti step up, Pākehā mā, you need to vote.
andyreisinger.bsky.social
#climatechange #JobAlert the New Zealand Climate Change Commission, He Pou A Rangi, is looking for a Principal Analyst, Analytics and Economics. Closing 26 September.

Scope includes advice on NZ ETS settings, emissions reduction monitoring, and advice on emissions budgets and targets.
Climate Change Commission job - Principal Analyst – Analytics and Economics
centralagenciesjobs.cass.govt.nz

by Andy ReisingerReposted by: Peter Thorne

andyreisinger.bsky.social
We'll cross global warming of 1.5°C in the next 5 years or so - what then?

I'll explore the challenges and choices we're facing with climate overshoot in a lecture on 18 September for the Centro Euro-Mediterranneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici

www.cmcc.it/lectures_con...
Advertisement for lecture "Overshoot: challenges and choices after we exceed 1.5°C", by Andy Reisinger, for the lecture series of the Centro Euro-Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici (Euro-Mediterranean Centre for Climatic Changes)
andyreisinger.bsky.social
An in a simplistic interpretation, a company that has negative emissions is owed a reward (like people planting trees), whereas a company that has positive emissions has to pay a price for its emissions. Agree the problem is not GWP* as such, but misinterpretation what those numbers mean for policy.
andyreisinger.bsky.social
The issue is that in a simplistic interpretation of the numbers that GWP* provides, a factory that drops its historically high emissions will report negative emissions based on GWP*, whereas the same factory will still report positive emissions using GWP.
glenpeters.bsky.social
The DIAMOND project has made an important milestone: the first draft release of six open integrated assessment models (IAMs) that are emblematic in both scientific and policy processes. Now is the chance to contribute and provide feedback!
preview.mailerlite.com/y7x9l4x1r1
In info graphic of six IAMs
andyreisinger.bsky.social
Ah, the pitfalls of commenting from afar... Thanks for letting me know!

by Andy ReisingerReposted by: Peter Thorne

andyreisinger.bsky.social
It's outstanding that this clear presentation is part of Germany's public broadcaster's daily weather forecast. Long may the stamina last not only of @terliwetter.bsky.social (thank you!) but also those in charge of the @heuteshow.de that enable him to provide this essential public service.
terliwetter.bsky.social
#Klimakatastrophe #globaleErhitzung

Reposted by: Andy Reisinger

davidho.bsky.social
Trump is right that DC is besieged by criminals; they’re in the administration.
ottoenglish.bsky.social
What dastardly schemes will this evil council conjure up next in its mission to.... checks notes... stop people getting killed by bad drivers
Killer kerb' that wrecks
cars installed by pro-
pedestrian council
Furious motorists complain over 13-
inch high construction introduced
by Lib Dem-led local authority
andyreisinger.bsky.social
With a stark graphic: far from alleviating global hunger, animal-sourced food products produced by high and upper-middle income countries predominantly go to other wealthy countries, with less than 6% of total animal food production by those countries reaching low and lower-middle income countries.
A Sankey diagram showing the types and destinations of animal sourced foods produced by high and upper-middle income countries. 70.94% go to high income countries, another 23.32% go to upper-middle income countries, 4.93% go to lower-middle income countries, and 0.81% go to low income countries (all percentages based on trade value). Over 47% reside in low and lower-middle income countries.
andyreisinger.bsky.social
National temperature neutrality, agricultural methane and climate policy: reinforcing inequality in the global food system

iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1...

👀⛈️ #nzpol (it's about Ireland though)
Screenshot of the scientific journal page containing the paper: "National temperature neutrality, agricultural methane and climate policy: reinforcing inequality in the global food system" by Colm Duffy*, Carl Doedens, Róisín Moriarty, Hannah Daly, David Styles and Malte Meinshausen, published in Environmental Research Letters, volume 20, Number 9
roisinmoriarty.com
🧵THREAD on agri-methane and ‘no additional warming’

Why is it so important to reduce methane (CH4) emissions from agriculture in the near term?

What happens when countries like #Ireland use ‘no additional warming’ to set climate targets?

PAPER: iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1...

(1/18)
Screen grab of paper title, published in Environmental Research Letters, 12 August 2025. Title reads: National temperature neutrality, agricultural methane emissions and climate policy: reinforcing inequality in the global food system. Duffy et al 2025.

Reposted by: Andy Reisinger

hypoautonomic.bsky.social
Maybe if they stopped pretending everyone is too stupid to read the IUCN report they hide behind they wouldn't have to cry and complain about the criticism they receive?
founder of colossalbio Ben Lamm posts a meme that states that the IUCN definition of de-extinction is "the process of creating an organism that resembles an extinct species" 2016 IUCN report:  The term "de-extinction" is misleading in its implication that extinct species, species for which no viable members remain, can be resurrected in their genetic behavioural and physiological entirety.  
https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/Rep-2016-009.pdf

Reposted by: Andy Reisinger

jjaron.bsky.social
Very intriguing! Colossal has previously denied any involvement in similar articles www.newscientist.com/article/2490...

by A. E. DesslerReposted by: Andy Reisinger

andrewdessler.com
Yeah, I really thought that we passed this level of denier BS. Apparently not.
andrewdessler.com
I've been getting a lot of requests for comments on the DOE report "A critical review of the impact of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions on the U.S. climate". Here are some initial thoughts. More will come later.
This DOE report is best understood through the lens of a well-known saying: “process is product.” In other words, the final document reflects the process that created it — including, most importantly, who was selected to write it. The authors of this report are widely recognized contrarians who don’t represent the mainstream scientific consensus. If almost any other group of scientists had been chosen, the report would have been dramatically different. The only way to get this report was to pick these authors.
The report they produced should be thought of as a law brief from attorneys defending their client, carbon dioxide. Their goal is not to weigh the evidence fairly but to build the strongest possible case for CO2’s innocence. This is a fundamental departure from the norms of science. 
A lawyer is expected to represent their client zealously and selectively, presenting only the information that strengthens their case and leaving it to the opposing counsel to present the other side. In fact, a lawyer who stood up in court and gave equal weight to both sides of a case would be considered professionally negligent, possibly even disbarred.
In science, the standard is the opposite. Scientists are obligated to engage with the full range of evidence, especially that which might contradict their hypotheses. Ignoring contrary data is not just bad practice, in some cases it can rise to the level of scientific misconduct. 
Scientific credibility depends on a willingness to base conclusions on all of the evidence. When scientists cherry-pick data or misrepresent the balance of evidence, they are violating a core principle of the discipline.
In this report, the authors are firmly in lawyer mode. They sift through data to find the few examples that support their narrative while systematically ignoring the much larger body of evidence that contradicts it. 
In conclusion, this report does not appear to be a fair assessment of the state of climate science.

Reposted by: Andy Reisinger

sanjanah.bsky.social
The InternetNZ AGM falls on Thursday. It's a very consequential one. To secure institution's ability to serve all New Zealanders, members must vote down proposed changes to InternetNZ's constitution by the Free Speech Union (FSU) - published on their website. If passed, InternetNZ won't be the same.

References

Fields & subjects

Updated 1m