Gordon Pennycook
banner
gordpennycook.bsky.social
Gordon Pennycook
@gordpennycook.bsky.social

Associate Professor, Psychology @cornelluniversity.bsky.social. Researching thinking & reasoning, misinformation, social media, AI, belief, metacognition, B.S., and various other keywords. 🇨🇦

https://gordonpennycook.com/ .. more

Gordon Robert Pennycook is a Canadian psychologist who is an associate professor at Cornell University. He is also an adjunct professor of Behavioural Science at the University of Regina's Hill and Levene Schools of Business. In 2020, he was elected to be a member of the Royal Society of Canada’s College of New Scholars, Artists, and Scientists. .. more

Political science 22%
Sociology 21%
Pinned
🚨 Now out in Psych Science 🚨

We report an adversarial collaboration (with @donandrewmoore.bsky.social) testing whether overconfidence is genuinely a trait

The paper was led by Jabin Binnendyk & Sophia Li (who is fantastic and on the job market!) Free copy here: journals.sagepub.com/eprint/7JIYS...
I can still recall all the tut-tutting from the media when Harris made this argument.
Kamala Harris at her closing campaign rally:

"Donald Trump intends to use the United States Military against American citizens who simply disagree with him."
once again being driven insane by ML conference submissions
One of the most salient differences between Trump's first and second term is that he is now surrounding himself with people who are genuinely radicalized. Some of them are blatantly lying, sure. But to do it so callously and at this scale... I have to think that many really believe their own BS.
Leavitt: "The deadly incident that took place yesterday in Minnesota yesterday occurred as a result of a larger, sinister left-wing movement that has spread across our country where our brave men and women of federal law enforcement are under organized attack."
Leavitt: "The deadly incident that took place yesterday in Minnesota yesterday occurred as a result of a larger, sinister left-wing movement that has spread across our country where our brave men and women of federal law enforcement are under organized attack."

Reposted by Greg Linden

we're not even a full week into 2026 yet
This seems a fitting song for the moment (as it is time and time again).
Neil Young - Ohio [Live At Massey Hall 1971] (Video)
YouTube video by neilyoungchannel
www.youtube.com
A new paper by George Borjas—who served this past year in the Trump White House designing some of its anti-immigration policies—claims to display evidence of ideological bias among researchers who study immigration.

doi.org/10.1126/scia...

🧵 Thread—>

Reposted by Gordon Pennycook

The U.S. government bans 5 people from the country, alleging “Murthy-style speech suppression.” Masnick: “So the State Department is citing a case that disproved government censorship as evidence of government censorship. That’s not even creative lying — it’s just citing your own loss as precedent.”
Good article, but I think we could add that many of the current government officials & influencers spreading political point-scoring falsehoods during crisis events HAVE BECOME gov officials & influencers BECAUSE of their bullshit-spreading talents. System effects of rotten attention dynamics.
Government Officials Once Stopped False Accusations After Violence. Now, Some Join In.
www.nytimes.com

Also, secondarily, I made the mistake of focusing on the camera and not looking at myself... and hence did not realize what my face was doing.

I did an interview today while on vacation... and the only room free from the intrusion of children was my in-law's laundry room 😂

If you're curious (it's about using AI for political persuasion): www.cbc.ca/player/play/...

One reasonable guess is that censoring this report will actually cause *more* people to watch it and hear about it.
The full spiked 60 Minutes CECOT package, clean & subtitled. 1/5
The full spiked 60 Minutes CECOT package, clean & subtitled. 1/5

Reposted by Gordon Pennycook

"Some people do believe that they are able to perform relatively well on tasks even when there is little reason for that confidence. Our results support the claim that overconfidence might be a trait." pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41401360/
The Epstein file is the only thing Trump has ever taken his name off of

Thank you!!

Nothing particularly insightful to say about that, but I do think it's a great question a very promising direction for future research! (Also possible that there's already some work on this that I'm not aware of)

Ah, interesting! This paper (www.cambridge.org/core/journal...) looks at a broader set of associations and the correlations are quite modest

For estimated performance, there aren't consistent gender differences. However, when it comes to overplacement (thinking you're better than others on the task), men are more overconfident than women

Thanks to Cory Clark and Phil Tetlock and their "Adversarial Collaboration Project" for supporting this work! web.sas.upenn.edu/adcollabproj...
Research Team | Adversarial Collaboration Project
web.sas.upenn.edu

Ultimately, it may have taken several papers and much back-and-forth to come to a similar conclusion. And, most likely, we might never have come to a genuine agreement if we had not engaged in this adversarial collaboration together. I think it's a great approach to science!

Nonetheless, we came to an agreement on the following conclusion: "some participants are more confident than others across the seemingly random tasks we offered. These relationships provide support for a within-individual consistency and a trait interpretation of confidence and
overconfidence."

@donandrewmoore.bsky.social et al remain skeptical about trait overconfidence (see the discussion section of the article), but future work will hopefully help evaluate whether the tendency to be confident on these types of "unconfounded" tasks is predictive of real-world instances of overconfidence

Although performance on these tasks is (essentially) random, some ppl just think they are doing better than others. This is what I would like to call "generalized" overconfidence: The extra boost of confidence that people who tend to be overconfident bring with them to various situations/contexts.

We then tested whether the tendency to indicate confidence when it is not justified is consistent across the 8 tests that we devised. The results were straightforward: The tendency was very consistent across tasks. Factors analyses supported a single factor.

To test whether overconfidence is genuinely a trait, we created several tasks where ppl have no basis for confidence (e.g., guessing whether someone has an innie or outie belly button based on a pic of their face). We pretested them to make sure that they were unfamiliar tasks that involved guessing

Before I talk about the results, I just want to say that it was such a pleasure to work with @donandrewmoore.bsky.social more & his team. This ad collab did not require a moderator & it was very pleasant throughout! Don, of course, is extremely reasonable (my highest possible praise)!

Don was justifiably skeptical that this was genuinely measuring an underlying trait, as opposed to (once again, based on past work) an idiosyncratic form of overconfidence that would not strongly correspond with other measures of overconfidence.

So, we did an ad collab to test it further!

To address this concern, Jabin & I created a task where people have to, essentially, guess the answer ("the Generalized Overconfidence Task"). Even though people are guessing and confidence is not related to performance, some people are *still* more confident. And this predicts a bunch of things.

Ppl tend to be more overconfident for tasks that they are bad at and less overconfident for tasks that they are good at. I.e., Task performance confounds our estimates of *trait* overconfidence. Thus, as Don has pointed out many times, overconfidence measures are highly unreliable.