Gordon Pennycook
banner
gordpennycook.bsky.social
Gordon Pennycook
@gordpennycook.bsky.social

Associate Professor, Psychology @cornelluniversity.bsky.social. Researching thinking & reasoning, misinformation, social media, AI, belief, metacognition, B.S., and various other keywords. 🇨🇦

https://gordonpennycook.com/ .. more

Gordon Robert Pennycook is a Canadian psychologist who is an associate professor at Cornell University. He is also an adjunct professor of Behavioural Science at the University of Regina's Hill and Levene Schools of Business. In 2020, he was elected to be a member of the Royal Society of Canada’s College of New Scholars, Artists, and Scientists. .. more

Political science 22%
Sociology 21%
Pinned
New paper in PSPB! journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...

Well, actually, not "new". We first put this paper online way back Dec 2022... in any case, we think it's really cool!

We find that conspiracy believers tend to be overconfident & really don't seem to realize that most disagree with them

To find new music. Generally listen to it twice, removing songs I definitely don't like and then putting songs I like on a rolling "current tunes" Playlist (that contains new music that I like, until I grow weary of a song). The playlist is usually around 4 hours long

I listen (essentially) every week. Release radar as well
PS is excited to announce the launch of "Individual Differences in Cognition” (IDIC), an open-access journal on research in cognitive psychology, science, and neuroscience. Co-Editors-in-Chief are Andrew R.A. Conway & Michael J. Kane. Manuscripts accepted this spring. More information coming soon!
🚨New WP🚨
Dialogues with our AI DebunkBot:
✔️Reduced belief in antisemitic conspiracy theories among believers
✔️Effect durable at 1+ month
✔️Improved attitudes towards Jews among initially negative participants

🟰Debunking works for deeply rooted, identity-linked conspiracies
osf.io/preprints/ps...

The “piggy” comment is really disturbing.

Yes it is bullying and just mean and disrespectful.

But it’s probably also indicative of a continuing loss of inhibitory control. And that’s a sign of cognitive decline.
I don't know why the "Piggy" thing is bothering me so much. It's one more unforgivable thing in a list of 20,000 unforgivable things, but I've been mad about it for like 12 straight hours.

So, to recap the last couple of days:

1) Trump said "quiet piggy" to a woman reporter after she asked a question he didn't like

2) He giddily hosted MSB at the Whitehouse and essentially said that Khashoggi deserved to be murdered

3) He called for Democratic lawmakers to be hanged for sedition
a man in a leather jacket and tie is saying cool cool cool cool cool cool cool
ALT: a man in a leather jacket and tie is saying cool cool cool cool cool cool cool
media.tenor.com
I guess one difference between me and Elon Musk is that, if I was gaming an AI to say these things about me, and everyone could see that I had done this, I'd have simply no choice but to set myself on fire.

He makes a similar argument in the paper
The “piggy” comment is really disturbing.

Yes it is bullying and just mean and disrespectful.

But it’s probably also indicative of a continuing loss of inhibitory control. And that’s a sign of cognitive decline.
I don't know why the "Piggy" thing is bothering me so much. It's one more unforgivable thing in a list of 20,000 unforgivable things, but I've been mad about it for like 12 straight hours.

I'm saying that I don't think we can assume it's widespread given the technical hurdles. Also, it would be pretty shocking if the 1000s of responses that people are getting from online participants every day were replaced with AI and it escaped all of our attention. It's possible, but I'm skeptical.

Not saying it isn't possible. Just doubtful that it's already happened and uncertain that it will happen

I guess I'm working under the assumption that one would still need to manage the bots to some extent. And, to ruin the entire pool, it would either need to be some combination of very many people with a good number of bots, or a few people with a very large number of bots.

Well, it's true that it's documented. The extent to which it's a huge problem is, in my view, debatable.

MTurk, yes. But what we've gotten from Prolific has been decent, despite a lull that I think was caused by a viral TikTok event

Fair fair. I'm just saying, absent positive evidence (and given the technical expertise required), we aren't in a position to therefore assume that this is a thing that is currently happening.

That is, assuming a particular degree of technical sophistication, a person with that sophistication could presumably do a lot of profitable things with their time.

In a future where it's simple to do, the problem becomes much more acute obviously.

Sure, but in the case of (1) it's a problem that could (in theory) be dealt with via replication (i.e., if it's a small number of bad actors, it's a numbers game). For (2), it depends on the opportunity costs of the ppl who have such skills. Are MTurk studies sufficiently profitable?

That's fair - but I think there's a big difference between a small number of bad actors sometimes screwing up a study (a concern, but a manageable one, since things can be replicated etc.) and normal human participants being broadly replaced by AI bots (a catastrophic problem that destroys the pool)

Of course, but that's still a potential *future* problem - we have no evidence to say that it is currently a problem. I don't think it's inevitable even in the tech is there, as participants also have an incentive to be genuine. If the pools get bad enough, then researchers will stop using them

Reposted by Calvin K. Lai

Just so that we're on the same page: This paper tells us what is *possible* not what is *true*

This is definitely a concern, but (FWIW) I am highly skeptical that typical survey respondents have the technical skills (let alone the inclination) to do all of this.
new paper by Sean Westwood:

With current technology, it is impossible to tell whether survey respondents are real or bots. Among other things, makes it easy for bad actors to manipulate outcomes. No good news here for the future of online-based survey research
new paper by Sean Westwood:

With current technology, it is impossible to tell whether survey respondents are real or bots. Among other things, makes it easy for bad actors to manipulate outcomes. No good news here for the future of online-based survey research

Reposted by Gordon Pennycook

Higher education is one of our country's most successful export industries.

And the exports (i.e. international students coming here) make it more affordable for domestic students.

No decently run government would interfere with that, but here we are.
Of course the White House is leaning into this. Because apparently they don't realize we exported more higher ed last year than natural gas & coal *combined*
Today is Publication Day! 🎉
The Psychological Quest for Meaning is out!

Aimed at researchers, but we hope it is readable for anyone interested in how humans make sense of their lives.

Guilford Press is offering 15% off with code AU2E:
www.guilford.com/books/The-Ps...

This is a huge loss for the field, and an even greater loss for those who knew and loved him. Jonny was truly one of a kind
Jonny Smallwood @themindwanders.bsky.social was a beloved friend and mentor. He was taken from us too soon. His was a beautiful mind who understood the beauty of minds. As ever before, his kind voice guides me and his work will continue. We miss you Jonny. www.cbs.mpg.de/news/obituar...
Obituary – Jonathan Smallwood
www.cbs.mpg.de
Count the ways they’re corrupting DOJ: Presidents don’t direct AG’s to open criminal cases, especially ones designating only Dems for investigation when POTUS himself is involved. DOJ doesn’t publicize criminal investigations & the AG definitely doesn’t assign them on Twitter.
Jamelle was cooking.

Gift link: www.nytimes.com/2025/11/12/o...

Haha, fantastic!

Ah jeez, the fact-checking I did to support this joke was whether it was really an AI (which does appear to be true). I did note that they have millions of listens on Spotify though

It complete makes sense that this happened first for mainstream country music, which is totally generic and terrible

Reposted by Gordon Pennycook

Jonny Smallwood @themindwanders.bsky.social was a beloved friend and mentor. He was taken from us too soon. His was a beautiful mind who understood the beauty of minds. As ever before, his kind voice guides me and his work will continue. We miss you Jonny. www.cbs.mpg.de/news/obituar...
Obituary – Jonathan Smallwood
www.cbs.mpg.de