Clayton Littlejohn
banner
cmlittlejohn.bsky.social
Clayton Littlejohn
@cmlittlejohn.bsky.social

Melbourne based philosopher. Dianoia RIP. Senior Research Associate, African Centre for Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, University of Johannesburg. Epistemology and ethics. #philsky #melbourne #democrats It ain't easy being blue .. more

Philosophy 48%
Psychology 20%

Not in this one, sadly. I have a few others that fill out the details of this project that I liked a bit better in terms of style, etc.

Anyway, have a read. Hope to have more on this forthcoming. The overlap with O'Connor's work on industrial distraction is quite promising. And just excited to have a paper on the value of information (VOI) in this space. As an epistemologist, I'm here to say listen to the decision people, not us

So, swapping the evidence the other way so that they get knowledge providing testimony that doesn't warrant as high confidence as the statistical evidence would be less valuable for their choices.

Thus, it might be accuracy-enhancing disinformation because it ensures that the content (while more accurate) can't play its desired practical function (e.g., giving proof of guilt in a criminal case). However, an agent who is betting would prefer statistics

Here's a silly example. Let E1 be naked statistical evidence that p. Let E2 be testimonial evidence that p. If evidence is needed to build a case, swapping E2 for E1 would improve accuracy (both over the prior and the alternative evidence) but thwart the effort to build a case.

we can also see how we can disinform while uncertain about the true state of the world, disinform using incredible content, disinform by improving credal accuracy, and the same content's status as disinformation or not might vary depending upon practical ends.

This can be done by supplying the audience with content that makes their attitudes more accurate. It can also be done by supplying the audience with content that bestows them knowledge. On the pragmatic account (content that functions to degrade the value of information for the audience's choices)

So yes, of course, disinformants can deceive and try to induce false belief, but they can also achieve their strategic ends by other means and so the consensus that it should be understood epistemically is wrong. It's about changing the value of information to influence choice.
I have news. Wonderful news.

New paper on #disinformation. The title is the thesis. Think of disinformation as content that functions to optimise the decisions of the audience for the disinformant. This doesn't require deception or content that induces false belief.

philpapers.org/rec/LITDIF
Clayton Littlejohn, Disinformation is for Degrading the Value of Information, not Confirming Falsehoods - PhilPapers
According to a recent account of disinformation, disinformation is content that “generates ignorance” (Simion 2024a; 2024b). The view improves upon previous accounts that focused upon the potential fo...
philpapers.org
wut

I made this cake. Tasted better than it looked.
I wish I didn’t have to share this. But the BBC has decided to censor my first Reith Lecture.

They deleted the line in which I describe Donald Trump as “the most openly corrupt president in American history.” /1
Most accounts on Twitter turn out to be Russian MAGA bots. Here’s why Bluesky has an intellectual diversity problem

Me: (pleased with this rebrand) I’m a disinformation theorist
Them: (scrunch face) What’s that, like a conspiracy theorist?
Me: Maybe time for another another rebrand

Could work. But it's been conditionally accepted (I think)

Admittedly, corrupted by Gabriel Garcia Marquez's _The Story of a Shipwrecked Sailor: Who Drifted on a Liferaft for Ten Days Without Food or Water, Was Proclaimed a National Hero, Kissed by Beauty Queens, Made Rich Through Publicity, and Then Spurned by the Government and Forgotten for All Time_

the 's was provocative. Consider it dropped.

I'm too out of touch to know yet if people are mad about Mamdani's visit, but a little distance between Trump and Loomer isn't a bad thing
Notice how Loomer says “Trump admin” rather than Trump because even in this moment she can’t bring herself to criticize the man directly.

I want to argue that disinformation leaves us worse off by reducing the value of information for choice (which isn't quite the same as confirming falsehoods). Which should I go with? I don't know if "pragmatic degradation" is great, but (3) is shorter than (4) and (5). But (4/5) use a known term

(5) Disinformation is about the Degradation of the Value of Information, not Disconfirmation

Need help choosing a title.
(1) Disinformation as Degradation or Confirmation?
(2) Disinformation is Degradation, not Confirmation
(3) Disinformation is Pragmatic Degradation, not Confirmation
(4) Disinformation as the Degradation of the Value of Information, not Confirmation

Reposted by Clayton Littlejohn

Notice how Loomer says “Trump admin” rather than Trump because even in this moment she can’t bring herself to criticize the man directly.

What does Mandani have photos of??
“Would you feel comfortable living in NYC under a Mamdani administration?”

TRUMP: “I would. I really would.”

Reposted by Clayton Littlejohn

“Would you feel comfortable living in NYC under a Mamdani administration?”

TRUMP: “I would. I really would.”

A steal at any price

Surely at this point the DOJ's illegality tab is much bigger than whatever Abrego Garcia's is alleged to be. Maybe he can send them to a prison of his choosing?

There's a national philosophy group that does their thing and is a bit inclusive and there are some continental things that are based in Melbourne, but so much of the analytic talent is spread around the various small departments that it's hard to get good collaboration going

Interested in starting a society for analytic philosophy in Melbourne area, but need a name. Some ideas:

MAAP: Melbourne Association for Analytic Philosophy
SPAM: Society for Philosophers Analytic in Melbourne
MAPS: Melbourne's Analytic Philosophy Society

Thoughts? Alternatives? Questions?
Trump DOJ Defies Another Court Order in Abrego Garcia Case talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/trump...
Trump DOJ Defies Another Court Order in Abrego Garcia Case
GREENBELT, MD—If the Justice Department had brazenly defied a judge’s order a...
talkingpointsmemo.com