Scholar

Adam Sacarny

H-index: 14
Economics 44%
Public Health 18%
jakemgrumbach.bsky.social
The 2025 academic econ job market is trending better than the first COVID market year but worse than the rest of 2019-present

www.davidvandijcke.com/joe_tracker/
asacarny.bsky.social
I think at Mailman at least there is an opportunity to request an extension, it isn't automatic. Just based on an email I saw from earlier this year. I'm not sure how hard it is to actually get the extension
asacarny.bsky.social
The bus I've been taking this week makes local stops then runs on the highway. Like the bus in the movie Speed. It's all I can think about on my way in.
Screenshot from the movie Speed of the bus making a high-speed turn surrounded by police vehicles
asacarny.bsky.social
Yesterday I had the privilege of visiting the Broad Street pump! Sadly, I saw that the pump handle had been removed. I worked to reinstall the pump handle so local residents would not be deprived of this vital resource. So glad to bring some of the latest American public health ingenuity to London!
Selfie of me smiling in front of the Broad Street pump
News reports say Columbia paid a "fine" of $200 million, which is grossly excessive, given the lack of any government authority to impose such a fine. On the blog, I parse the agreement and the stakes to explain what the dollar figure really reflects and its ominous implications. 👇
How Bad is the Columbia Settlement Agreement?
Reporting (e.g.,  in the NY Times ) on the settlement agreement between Columbia University and the United States government describes the $...
www.dorfonlaw.org
asacarny.bsky.social
If you end up using it please let me know how it goes! It seems like the RxNorm data is good for this application but would love confirmation...
asacarny.bsky.social
A lot of you have been asking how my 10 million beneficial nematodes are doing. Well the answer is that me and my 10 million microscopic sons are doing great! Thanks so much
asacarny.bsky.social
I know a lot is happening right now, so I want to pass along some happier news: I just purchased 10 million beneficial nematodes.
asacarny.bsky.social
Currently in an ASHEcon session where my collaborator will be presenting our paper so I’m covering my name tag and whispering to people in the audience that I heard the last paper is really good with a very solid identification strategy
asacarny.bsky.social
I know a lot is happening right now, so I want to pass along some happier news: I just purchased 10 million beneficial nematodes.
asacarny.bsky.social
In a symptomatic coincidence, I literally just pulled up the wikipedia page on the Niemoller poem because it seemed relevant to ANOTHER issue
asacarny.bsky.social
Extremely bad news is right. And I worry the same forces are coming for federal health care data.
aaronsojourner.org
EXTREMELY BAD NEWS for economic research, per former BLS Commissioner @ericagroshen.bsky.social on LinkedIn.

BLS is suspending access to its restricted data "for the forseeable future." Applies to projects through the Federal Statistical Research Data Centers & onsite projects with BLS.
#EconSky
asacarny.bsky.social
The other thing that comes to mind: I seem to recall the IRB being one of many smoking guns in the LaCour scandal too
asacarny.bsky.social
Still, the proper channel is going to involve seeking a no human subjects research determination from the IRB which would typically involve a faculty PI. I'm guessing this did not happen lol

And it took me years to understand that this is the *correct* way to do QI work... many wasted hours on IRB🤦
asacarny.bsky.social
I don't want to enable any criminal masterminds here, and I doubt the grift was this advanced, but there are ways to evade review that look like "I'm helping this organization do quality improvement and the data sits with the org"
asacarny.bsky.social
… my concern would have been “you didn’t do a great job assessing quality so you need to either improve the method or caveat your findings more” and not “your data is fake lol”
asacarny.bsky.social
Like for example I peeked at the paper and I was immediately surprised he could assess the “quality” of the materials. Turns out this suspicion may have been warranted, per the link you shared. So if I read the paper as an advisor I’d probably flag it. But …
asacarny.bsky.social
Ugh it’s tough because pretty much everything we do (advising, peer review, collaboration [!!]) rests on the assumption that people are not making things up from whole cloth. idk how these systems can work if they are supposed to detect that too
asacarny.bsky.social
… rather than catapulting the results to international attention.”

I see this whenever I run an RCT and I’ve watched it play out in countless other RCTs too. The data never looks THAT nice and priors are almost never TOTALLY validated
asacarny.bsky.social
“Learning new things about the world is hard, and generally randomized trials on such a complex topic should show much more ambiguous results. The fact that the data was so beautiful and fit such a perfect narrative should have raised alarm bells …
asacarny.bsky.social
This is TOMORROW!
asacarny.bsky.social
NYC Health Econ Day is coming May 9 @ NYU Wagner! We'll have 6 great papers + lots of time to chat. Folks in the greater NYC area are invited!

RSVP: docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F...
More info: www.stern.nyu.edu/experience-s...

Organizers: @ambond.bsky.social, Mike Dickstein, Jessica Van Parys + me
Screenshot of NYC Health Econ day conference program, text available here https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~mjd19/conf_org/health_econ_day_program_2025.pdf
asacarny.bsky.social
Arguing with the IRB about publishing research out of quality improvement work
Screenshot of Nathan Fielder in "The Rehearsal" speaking into a phone. The closed caption says "So there's dual goals, I guess"

References

Fields & subjects

Updated 1m