@lumidingo.bsky.social
290 followers 1.1K following 3.2K posts
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
lumidingo.bsky.social
Doggies can have the little end-piece of a strip of biltong, as a treat
lumidingo.bsky.social
No it isn't. It's the same usage as dunk on.
lumidingo.bsky.social
There's a perfectly good argument for why not to. Because men like yourself keep beating women.
Seattle Area Trans
Women Are Being
Attacked by Groups of
Men

In the Last Year, the County Prosecutor's
Office Has Filed Charges in Four Such
Cases
lumidingo.bsky.social
Trans women are frequently physically assaulted after disclosure. Isn't it ethical and in the best interests of the trans community to disclose your predilections for abusing trans women before having a sexual encounter?
lumidingo.bsky.social
"Are you seventy years old" is a question, not an expression of hatred. Finger off the trigger there, old timer.
lumidingo.bsky.social
Are you seventy years old? That's some fossilised attack line you're throwing around there.
lumidingo.bsky.social
By making light of a genocide?
lumidingo.bsky.social
By making light of a genocide?
lumidingo.bsky.social
There was an ongoing genocide at the time, and the subject matter of the proposal directly involved both the resistance movement resisting said genocide and the population currently being genocided. The proposal is abhorrent, period.
lumidingo.bsky.social
"It wasn't filmed, so no harm no foul" may be your vile position, but that just demonstrates you share the same moral absence as whoever made the suggestion.
lumidingo.bsky.social
Something DID happen - they made an abhorrent proposal. That's something that did happen and is literally the subject of discussion. Don't be daft.
lumidingo.bsky.social
Also, it's not 'bumbling' to reduce the reality of a genocide-in-progress to a game. It's morally reprehensible. That's not a silly whoopsy-doo. They should rightly be ashamed of themselves.
lumidingo.bsky.social
He obviously can handle it, since he was perfectly capable of telling them in the moment that it was in poor taste.

The fact that they didn't do something that a guest was obviously not going to play along with is not exculpatory.
lumidingo.bsky.social
Because there's no such thing as a brainstorming/proposals session that occurs in the green room a short time before filming.

The suggestion is in shockingly poor taste, and nominees have every right to communicate how distasteful such a proposal was to others. There's no vow of silence here.
lumidingo.bsky.social
The unions are regular working people. You're arguing that regular working people were 'destroying the country'.

Mate, we didn't have rivers filled with shit, 20% of the country skipping meals, and schools and hospitals literally crumbling. We fucking do now!
lumidingo.bsky.social
Her effect was so huge because she took all the achievements of the welfare state, all the benefits of nationalised assets, all the benefits of a unionised workforce and the standard of living it afforded people. 40 years of work just smashed to bits and sold off for pennies. Just devastating.
lumidingo.bsky.social
And I asked you why you thought he was reaching for anything since it's clear you didn't know he was reaching for anything and you were just inferring that, something you've confirmed to be the case
lumidingo.bsky.social
How do you know what he's doing is reaching for something, since you've conceded that it was only an inference you came up with?
lumidingo.bsky.social
Why would you ask what he reached for if you don't know that he reached for anything?

I mean, you've already said it was an inference on your part, so you've already conceded that you don't know that he was reaching for anything.

Which is what I called you on in the first place.
lumidingo.bsky.social
You would have actually been good at it and not developed a huge ego, though.